@Martinez_2314@big78659@WadePlem do you know how delusional you have to be to think YOUR opinion is more valid then a UFC CHAMPION on the topic of combat sports
@WadePlem@_Giannis_S MMA is definitely not the hardest to fight in people have started MMA during their late teen years and became champions. Even Arman has said boxing is the hardest sport and hes a MMA fighter personally his opinion would be more valued then yours no?
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ If someones a piece of shit i will say they are a piece of shit HE KILLED the grandson of the Prophet(S) end of discussion
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Someone criticizing Yazid does not automatically mean they will insult Ahl al-Bayt, just like someone defending respect for the Sahaba does not mean they must defend every political action by every ruler
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Even major Muslim scholars throughout history have discussed the actions of rulers, including caliphs, because leadership comes with responsibility.
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Being a caliph does not make someone above historical discussion or criticism. Respecting historical figures does not mean treating every decision they made as automatically correct.
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Yazid wasnt a companion of the Prophet(S) secondly your getting mad at me for insulting yazid and telling me be like the Prophet(S) while you were insulting me a few replies ago lol
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Yazid KILLED the Grandson's of the Prophet(S) what dont u understand. And condemning him is not what a small minority of Muslims do MAJORITY including Sunnis agree that he was morally and politically UNJUST
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Respecting Islamic figures does not mean pretending every historical decision was automatically correct. There is a difference between insulting someone out of hatred and critically analyzing the actions of historical figures
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Scholars have always discussed whether rulers, companions, and historical figures made correct or incorrect decisions while still acknowledging that ultimate judgment belongs to Allah. The two ideas are not mutually exclusive.
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Saying “leave it to God” does not mean Muslims are forbidden from studying history or making moral judgments about actions
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Islamic scholarship itself has always involved evaluating the actions of past rulers, scholars, and communities while still believing ultimate judgment belongs to Allah
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ The key flaw is the assumption that “God will judge them” = “humans cannot discuss their actions.” Those are not contradictory.
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ Remembering Karbala or analyzing the actions of historical figures does not mean Muslims today are responsible for events 1400 years ago it means understanding our history
@Sincerely_farah@izeezahraa_ If we truly want unity, we should be able to discuss difficult events honestly and fairly instead of avoiding them. The Quran itself discusses past nations and their mistakes so people can learn from them