Nitesh Kumar

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Saatvata Nope. Vayu can't be wesh. It doesn't even resonate. While Īsh is Wish. And Wēshparkar is Īshvara-kar(The lord Maker).

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@PurvBuddhaMaha Yes, Indeed.
Sarva-lokeshvarasya Meaning:- ...of Sarva The Ruler of worlds.
Mahishvara-sya would be Māhishvara-sya Meaning:- ...of the devotee of Mahishvara.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Ugrashravas "Thus was the old non-sectarian Vedic view." 🤣🤣

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@_Tamil_Nadodi @Telugurayaa Idiot. Nope. It is Early pallavas. That too isn't a temple, It was just an structure on which later a temple was made.

[Purv Buddha Mahasattav @PurvBuddhaMaha]

@CCanturu69558 Read the official report: the site dates to the 4th century CE, while the a Subrahmanya temple temple dates to the 6th–7th century CE. There is no mention of any structure from 300 BCE.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@KailashamD @CCanturu69558 Shut up lemurian. Your shit deity Murugan doesn't have a single piece of archaeological evidences.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@KailashamD @CCanturu69558 Why are you showing your illiteracy just stop child.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Senthilveluvc Are you a motherboard who can't even read?? Idiot. It is a temple but of pallava period which was made over pre-existing structure that's not a temple.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Senthilveluvc And idiot. Lord Skanda is mentioned in Maitrayani Samhita, Taitterya aranyaka, Kalpa-sutras, Parishishta and many ancient indic literatures which are older than your shit sangam literatures.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Senthilveluvc Idiot lemurian. There are no proof of any Inscriptional mention of Murugan or ceyon. While we have real Archaeological evidences of Lord Skanda

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Mohansachin @Kallar_vamsam00 This is 3rd CE Inscription of Andhra ikshavaku mention Kumara, Kartikeya. Also 3rd CE Kartikeya idol holding spear and rooster from Andhra.
What do you have?? Nothing you idiot.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@_Tamil_Nadodi @Telugurayaa The pre-existing structure(4th/5th CE) belongs to early pallava period(3rd/6th CE). Although that has no proof of being a temple but if we consider it a temple then it was made by early pallava kings like Shiv-Skand Varman and they were devotee of lord Skanda not Shit Murugan.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Vegeta16090 @Telugurayaa The pre-existing structure(4th/5th CE) belongs to early pallava period(3rd/6th CE). Although that has no proof of being a temple but if we consider it a temple then it was made by early pallava kings like Shiv-Skand Varman and they were devotee of lord Skanda not Shit Murugan.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Senthilveluvc That's just structure you lemurians not temple.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@vinodh1729 @4geeyar @Venkata32371490 @bseshadri Because all that temples are of Vedic lord Skanda. That's why he is worshipped with Vedas and Agamas.
But Your Ceyon(Murugan) was aniconic ritualistic deity. Later Lemurians adopted Skanda iconography and theology to make their shit deity famous and worshipful.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@KailashamD @CCanturu69558 🤣🤣 Idiot child motherboard. You are a fool no. One . Who doesn't even know difference between language and script and talking about linguistic.
Go first learn about Linguistic

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@KailashamD @vengayin36476 @CCanturu69558 Idiot. Here, Inscription and idol of Lord Skanda 👇👇

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Mohansachin @Kallar_vamsam00 This is 3rd CE Inscription of Andhra ikshavaku mention Kumara, Kartikeya. Also 3rd CE Kartikeya idol holding spear and rooster from Andhra.
What do you have?? Nothing you idiot.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@AssetAlphaa @TPranayReddy The real shit stories and madeup things was your shit sangam literatures whose oldest manuscript belongs to 13th-14th CE only.🤣🤣

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@AssetAlphaa @TPranayReddy 🤣🤣 Lemurians doesn't have their shit Deity archaeological evidence. So, Got triggered by seeing their Father real archaeological evidences. And motherfucker that's not 1000yrs old but 1800yrs old.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@AssetAlphaa @TPranayReddy Here Motherboard original archeological evidences which is real not like your shit Murugan who doesn't even have a single piece of archaeological evidences 🤣🤣.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Mohansachin @Kallar_vamsam00 This is 3rd CE Inscription of Andhra ikshavaku mention Kumara, Kartikeya. Also 3rd CE Kartikeya idol holding spear and rooster from Andhra.
What do you have?? Nothing you idiot.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@AssetAlphaa @TPranayReddy Idiot Your tamil land doesn't have any Inscriptional evidence of Murugan before 6th CE and also idols.
While there are many Inscriptions of Andhra ikshavaku(3rd-4th) mentioning about Lord Skanda. And also there are idols of that period.

[Nitesh Kumar @k55857761]

@Mohansachin @Kallar_vamsam00 This is 3rd CE Inscription of Andhra ikshavaku mention Kumara, Kartikeya. Also 3rd CE Kartikeya idol holding spear and rooster from Andhra.
What do you have?? Nothing you idiot.