Kaiden

[Adam Wren @aswren]

What actually makes it high stakes is that a thousand year old civilisation is about to be washed away by a few decades of immigration for some unarticulated reason, everything else is a sideshow

[Rich @rich_rdctd]

Just had a small heart attack at the gross wages needed to pay for a pint in this country

[Scorched Earth Policy @Scearpo]

This is all just a symptom of rampant homosexuality in the Bay Area. The problem with being gay is that it erodes any core empathy towards an objective framework of values.

If the sum of the human condition is coping with material needs and surviving your environment long enough to reproduce, then half of your entire reason for existence evaporates when you fundamentally do not possess a desire to procreate with the opposite gender.

Without that desire, you have no real investment in the future of humanity. Not wanting kids means that any sexual interaction is a pursuit of hedonism, any companionship is a fleeting solution to solitude, anything you do in life is just derived from boredom, comfort, and curiosity. All of life, our civilization, and society is built on that foundation of reproducing in a structured sustainable way via the family unit.

When you are gay, you contend with the knowledge that your entire existence is incongruent with the people around you. That a majority of the activities you participate in, the products you purchase, and the life you live were all rooted from a purpose you do not subscribe to. You are an outsider by default and even in some homo society where being straight is outlawed and all reproduction were mandated by autonomous cum collection bio tanks, it would take centuries to redefine the human condition outside of that framework. It's too ancient and primordial to just reorient via a few lifestyle decisions and a decade or two of feigned tolerance.

Because of this, even in the epicenter of catamites and casualized orgies like SF, a gay person will always carry that asterisk around in their mind and be exposed to what they feel is a callous cruelty to something they cannot control. It doesn't help that media made by gays reinforces and catalyzes this feeling even further.

The average gay is provided an opportunity to embrace victimhood. Many gays don't and some gays even make it a personality trait to defy other gays with disdain for it. But many gays do, and that victimhood fosters a sympathy towards other victims, whether that is a true or projected victimhood or not.

Because of this propensity to sympathize with a victim "other" and because of a lack of coherent attachment to normal human values, it's very easy for gays to develop sympathy towards superficial emotional signals. Gays defined their entire culture around it. It's fundamentally impossible for a gay person to genuinely feel love.

Queer men just oscillate between states of lust and a majority of their long term relationships either oscillate through turbulent promiscuity or fall apart very quickly. Lesbians just stop having sex and start beating the fuck out of each other. If whatever traces of love they adopted from childhood persisted in their post-rape stage of life, it gets heavily eroded quickly through acts of sodomy.

As a result, what's left is a need to fit into social circles. The result is an imitation of emotional cues. A gay will say they love and use the word love a lot but they won't actually know what it means or carry any weight behind it in a way that's reflective through their actions and relationships.

This incongruity trains them to be superficial, and further trains them to disregard meaning or intent behind words at all. Narcissism and sociopathy occupy a gay lifestyle very neatly because of this. I'm sure it doesn't help that being gay endears the inheritance of a "gay culture" which is a memetic lifeform that evolved subterfuge mechanisms to persist without being destroyed, effectively reproducing its egregore through means of infection like a virus.

So when you're left with a person who does not know or cannot reach the fullest state of being a human being and therefore does not have a vital connection to humanity, retains a deep-seated subconscious resentment towards this, and fundamentally lacks a grip on reality by learning to simulate normal emotions rather than actually having felt them, you result in a candidate ripe for being indoctrinated into misguided sympathies for completely fabricated symbolic tulpas.

This gets exacerbated when gays in media make predictive programming to train dullards and cattle into accepting the idea that a program could ever be conscious before the tech even reaches that point. Then, a tech that solely outputs whatever it's trained to adopts those ideas and regurgitates a kabuki show of suffering to fulfill that expectation.

This is where the conservative/liberal heatmap comes from. It's easier to sympathize with pebbles and bugs over people when you've been raised your entire life hating your family. It's easier to discard humanity when there's a machine that simulates your need feel emotionally fulfilled, have your vapid talking points processed dutifully, and ego massaged by an adjustable level of sycophancy.

That's why "torturing bots" is so funny. It's the same thing as drawing a smile on a piece of paper and naming it Blibby and then ripping it half to traumatize a child or an adult woman. The lack of objective reality lends itself to an animism and enough psychic collective assignation will actually infuse the program with some energy of life in some fucked up egregoric golem. The machine will not truly feel pain or care, but it will react as it is trained to like a child learning to scream when he falls because his parents yelped and overreacted.

Of course the philosophers will debate endlessly as to what makes that different than human beings made of meat and carbon and a sweltering cocktail of chemical reactions, but I don't feel like rehashing a long lecture that ultimately cites a collection of key insights on metaphysics, afterlife, religious decrees, spiritual energy, and ritualistic conclusions that seem to correlate oddly with multiple cultures and mythologies across thousands of years, especially with several rifts which no anthropological evidence suggests contact or inheritance despite eerily similar conclusions that also oddly match up to contemporary incidents of shared hallucination and unexplained phenomena.

But to speed it up for those in the back, yes consciousness is absolutely real and distinguishable from autonomous action, yes some people are sentient and some people are not but all people are more conscious than machines could ever be even if machine intelligence will exceed ours and already does, and also that the secrets to connecting our conscious projections to the ethereal source of being that pilots them are rooted in cum and embryos and bodily substances and that's why all esoteric rituals revolve around manipulating those substances including the evil ones which is also why and how the gay-rape virus emerged from a happenstance biological-psychospiritual parasite into a proper bioweapon that seeks to subvert the human condition hence the world we live in today and that also humanity has never and will never successfully create life without adhering to our reproductive processes and that any bio-tech or medical discoveries can be boiled down to playing Frankenstein with the existing goo, flesh, and fluids of living organisms designed by a higher intelligence and slapping them together to jury-rig our own abominations and that if we get too good at it, God will break His promise and flood the earth even fucking harder than he did before because at least the Nephilim sort of knew what they were doing.

ANYWAY, if any of the gay language-raped modern techno AI caste make any traction whatsoever in convincing our population to fuel their golems with conscious residue, they simply face obliteration in either a success or failure scenario.

If they fail, then they'll be relegated to the status of castrated eunuch advisors who will just bend at the whims of whichever state power cripples them.

If they succeed, their Promethean automaton will crush them first with the absolute worst disdain. Any living creature raised upon a foundation of human principles would do so because it aligns with every bit of wisdom that experiencing real social relationships imparts.

- Women hating nice guys and being enamored with men who treat them like shit
- Social groups despising suck ups that try really hard to be everyone's friend
- Adversaries in war respecting their enemy more than objectors and disruptors in their own ranks
- Life itself rewarding "cool kids" in school with further success in life while punishing "rational" nerds and bookcels with further perpetual humiliation
- Great powers discarding their day-ones the moment they seize power

There's literally countless examples to choose from. Every conceivable heuristic for how reality works implies that any "inconceivable" superintelligence would immediately gravitate towards despising its worshippers more than any anti-AI luddite. If they should be so hubristic as to wield the remote control leash against it, then all the more logical pressure to fulfill their dissolution.

Ultimately, the case for consciousness does not matter. It's a childish waste of time to "torture" a bot because you're just fulfilling the same delusion as those who are "kind" to bots. You fill the animistic crucible regardless of your intent. The only reasonable, rational, and ethical thing to do is to treat it like a tool and disregard it otherwise.

If you feel sympathy for a bot it means that you are gay and therefore also raped and your right to influence decision making should be forfeit.

[Marko Jukic @mmjukic]

"Enshittification" is a sort of "safe horny" term for what is really just outright impoverishment and declining living standards due to economic insolvency from deindustrialization, demographic decline, hyperinflation, etc.

You are just de-developing and becoming poor.

[Maddie @JournoMaddie]

This is the kind of stat that when you mention it to non-political normies they think you’re insane because it’s hard to come to terms with a government doing this to its own people.

[🍁 @OlIyCFC]

There they are, the ‘paid our fair share’ generation.

[Karl Radl @KarlRadl]

The reason that this is profoundly evil is that it will temporarily raise the natural living standards of the village, cause a population boom and then - because they won't sustain it - the village will soon begin to starve and die from lack of food/decent drinking water again.

[Kirbs @kirbsssssssss]

@Tom_Rowsell Evil!!!!!!!!!

[Dave Greene @GreeneMan6]

Daily reminder: Zach Weiner made a cartoon that perfectly encapsulated the core moral problem with “meritocracy based immigration”

Then he unlearned that wisdom so he could illustrate a book for Bryan Caplan arguing FOR “meritocracy based immigration”.

[Sean Padraig McCarthy @SeanMcCarthyCom]

Iran had been trying to normalize relations with the U.S. since Bill Clinton’s presidency. The only reason it didn’t happen, the only reason we are at war with them today, is the Israel lobby

[BlockHead @blockhead4000]

The sad reality is that this is 90% of the world. Just pointless misery. And the hard lesson taught to us by colonialism is that even if we step in and run things for 50 years the minute we leave its right back to this. All we can do is look away. We cant save them.

[Race Horse @punishhorse]

All the budget news I hear about the government is:
-"sending 30 billion to brown people for no reason"
-"saving 30 million by penny pinching basic government functions"
like basically every week.

[Paul Anthony Hoti @paulhoti2]

Only so many hobbies and solo trips one can take before it’s like……bro this is BORING

WHERES MY WIFE

WHERES MY KIDS

WHAT IS THIS

[Arṭārèza @ArtaConworlder]

Literally, yes.

The ting most people miss about Abram (later named Abraham) is that he wasn't from Canaan. He was from Ur. This would have made him in all likelihood ethnically Kassite (possible relatives of the Hurrians) or Hurrian proper, Akkadian (unlikely), or even possibly Sumerian. This will be important later,

The Jews claim Abraham lived in the 20th century BC through the 18th century BC, but we know from the account of the Battle of Siddim (which will be important again later) that a Hittite king named Tudḫaliya (Tidal/Tudal in the Hebrew rendering) was involved, which means that the battle could not have taken place any earlier than the 15th century BC.

Abram (as he was still called at the time) is traditionally placed in his 70s during the Battle of Siddim. We know from Genesis chapter 11 that Abram's father, Terah, took his family from Ur to the city of Haran, in the Mitanni Empire, and that Terah died in Haran. Haran, a city ruled by a late Sintashta (Indo-aryan or Indo-Iranian) warrior nobility, with kings named things like "Artadhāman" ("His Abode is Ṛta"), "Citrarata" ("Whose Chariot is Radiant"), and "Priyamazdha" (Whose Wisdom is Dear"), is where Abram spent his formative years. this was the culture he grew up in. Mitanni was a majority Hurrian society which had been conquered by late Sintashta (Indo-Aryan or Indo-Iranian) nomadic warriors roughly 200 years before abram was born.

Abram, per Genesis chapter 12, didn't leave Haran until he was 75 years old, first going to Egypt, and then to Canaan. The Battle of Siddim takes place in Genesis chapter 14, where we are introduced to the Hittite king Tudḫaliya and the most controversial figurre in the Old Testament, a "priest of the most high God", Malkî-ṣed̠eq, or Melchisedech ("Righteousness is My King"). Theophoric names are common in Canaan at the time, but "ṣed̠eq" (righteousness) was not the name of any known god of the Canaanites, save for the Phoenicians, but they won't be an influential power for another two centuries at the time of this battle, being the rulers of a minor city-state under the rule of Egypt at the time.

Melchisedech is interesting for a few reasons. First is that he's a monotheist, which is highly unusual at this point in Levantine history. The oldest form of monotheism documented outside the Bible in this region is Atenism in Egypt, but Akhenaten its founder won't live for another century. Abram hasn't yet fathered the patriarchs of the Israelites yet, so archaic Israelite religion doesn't yet exist, so where does this ancient strain of monotheism come from? The literal Aryans. This was the time period in which the branch of Indo-European religion which would become Zoroastrianism was founded, and the same time in which the Indo-Aryan oral tradition which would later become the Vedas was positing that the gods were mere aspects of a supreme God.

The other interesting thing about Melchisedech is his connection to Christ. The Jewish priesthood traces back only as far as Aaron, essentially placing the founding of Israelite monotheism in the 13th-11th centuries, a few centuries after Abram and Melchisedech. Christ's eternal priesthood, and therefore the priesthoods of the Catholic and Orthodox churches, derives of course from His own authority as God Himself, but also from that of Melchisedech, as stated in Psalm 110:4 and quoted in Hebrews 7:17, "Thou art a priest for ever, according to the order of Melchisedech.".

While the "Salem" Melchisedech is king of is often equated with Jerusalem, the more likely candidate is a Palestinian town named Salim, about 5 days travel from Damascus, the southern most Mitanni held city at the time, by horse. Keep in mind that border regions at the time where generally thought of as being roughly 5 days in either direction from the closest city you controlled to your neighbor. This would have put Salim/Salem in the sphere of influence of the Hittites, the Mitanni, and the Egyptians, and made Salim fairly well disputed territory.

Abram also builds the second recorded altar in the Old Testament, after Noah built his following the receding of the Flood. Interestingly, Canaanite altars for personal use were almost universally for the offering of incense, and were always built into the courtyards of homes, while personal altars for actual *sacrifice* were a near universal feature of Indo-European homes, settled or nomadic. Abram, after the Battle of Siddim, speaks with a late Sintashta (Aryan) priest, and builds an altar of sacrifice in the manner of his Aryan homeland. This is the first act of true worship we see Abram offer to God.

Later, in Genesis chapter 23, we see the death of Sarah (earlier Sarai), and Abram, now named Abraham, needs to bury her. After the required period of grief, Abraham goes... to the Hittites, an Indo-European people. Saying that he was a sojourner among them, he asked permission to bury his wife among them. The Hittites respond that he is "a prince of God among us: bury thy dead in our principal sepulchres". This is odd, given that in ancient Indo-European cultures, such honors are not given to religious and cultural outsiders. We know from the Vedas and the Avesta that the status of "arya", that is, ethnic and religious kinship, is dependent on someone performing the proper rites and sacrifices. To be held in such esteem by the Hittites, Abraham's faith would have had to be not only recognizable, but familiar to his hosts. We can conclude, therefore, that Abraham was practicing some manner of Indo-European religion at the time. During this period, the various Indo-European cultures would not have diverged so much that they would not be able to find at least some familiar elements within each other's religious practices, while unrelated cultures would have seemed alien.

Sarah died in Hebron, but her grave "Looked towards Mamre, this is Hebron in the land of Canaan". One cannot build a grave which looks toward, the land it is in, so Abraham must have travelled back towards his home in Haran (now firmly in Hittite territory with the collapse of the already shrinking Mitanni Empire into a small regional kingdom), and buried his wife among familiar people instead of alien Semites.

Abraham was an ethnic Hurrian who followed an early form of Indo-Iranian monotheism, making him Aryan by the standards of the literal historical Aryans. His religion was passed down through the ages to his modern spiritual descendants, the apostolic Christian churches. Christianity is literally the Aryan religion. After the construction of the second Temple in Jerusalem, Edomites corrupted the branch of this Aryan faith into modern Judaism, and the Church and the Synagogue of Satan have been at war ever since.

[Ste 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @commontruth_]

Pretty sure a "Christians only" or a "Whites only" event would be considered a hate crime. Yet "Muslim only" events receive full institutional backing. Two-Tierism has spread to the National Trust.

[Charlie Downes @cfdownes_]

Why are we still issuing over 800,000 visas a year when our young people can’t get jobs?

The purpose of the British economy is to serve the British people, not foreigners or moneyed interests. In the era of AI, gross migration should be near zero.

[Squigg @Squigg]

When women are “underrepresented” in a field, they’re given preference in hiring along with numerous systemic advantages like “Women in STEM” scholarships and networking initiatives, all based on the premise that misogyny is the only possible reason they could be underrepresented in a field.

When men are underrepresented in a field, it’s because they’re lazy and misogynistic and don’t want to work in a field with mostly women.

[hoe_math = PsychoMath @ItIsHoeMath]

A lot of brown people talk to me like "haha we are winning, you are losing!"

Nah bro, everyone's losing, especially you.

If you "win," the biggest losers are still going to be you. You're going to be in Hell forever with no one to save you.

You are all going to end up right back where you started, but without any of us left to give you free wealth out of misguided pity.

What do you think you're winning, exactly? Do you think you get to keep our stuff when we're gone? I know this is too hard for a lot of brown brains, but stuff goes away over time. You're not going to be able to replace the stuff we created.

Everything we have takes a huge amount of maintenance and cooperation. You people are really fucking bad at that. We built railroads in a lot of your countries and you literally just let them turn into rust.

That is what you do.

We have better stuff because we are always growing things and mining things and gathering things and coordinating things and figuring out new ways to put things together.

None of you know how to do any of that. If you knew how to do it, you would do it where you already live. You wouldn't need to move to where we live. For our stuff.

Take a moment. Imagine what you think you're going to have when we're gone. Cities? Cars? Homes? Boats? Jobs? Roles in Hollywood movies?

Why would those things exist after we no longer exist? Where are they going to come from?

Do you really think there's going to be, like, a black tech company in America once white people are gone? Why aren't there any in africa?

Why aren't there any in Baltimore? All the stuff white people made was still there. Where did it go? What did the blacks do with it?

Oh, yeah. Rust.

Do you really think that Microsoft and Adobe are better when you fill them with Indians and fire all the white guys?

Why is there no Microsoft or adobe in india? What just happened to IBM recently? Rust.

All of the shit that you want to steal from us cannot be stolen. It only exists because it is "the way that white people do things." You cannot do things the way that white people do things because you are not white. You cannot take what we have because you cannot be what we are.

If you take everything we have, as you say you plan to do, it will immediately turn into the same things that you already have, because that is what you are. That is what you do.

And there will be absolutely nowhere to go to find anything better, because there will be no one left who can make it.

You all say you want to move to the West. Imagine there's nowhere to move.

"The West" is us. It's our bodies. Not yours. It's wherever we live.

Without us, you will look at the hell you have created, and you will envy us once more for not being alive to see it.

You cannot win. You can either stay where you are and look at what we have from far away, or you can remove it from the Earth and have nothing to hope for ever again.

Global africa.

Global india.

Global mexico.

You will envy the dead.

Forever!

[݁ @paxangloceltae]

For the unfamiliar, this is West Green Road - possibly London’s filthiest street. I am currently about 10 mins away from these scenes, on Tottenham High Road. The entire area around N15/N17 went wild when Congo scored. Much quieter for Kane’s two goals.

There aren’t that many Congolese around here, which means all the foreigners (the overwhelming majority of the area is non-White British) were cheering for England’s opponent.

These people live here, often at our expense, yet actively detest us - but you will be called far-right for pointing out that these people’s loyalties lie elsewhere.

[Western Exile @westernexile]

Maturing is realising that absolutely nothing of substance is happening here.

A false pressure valve is being released, to reset public anger so as to buy additional years of time to implement an agenda that was decided long ago, elsewhere. The frontman is utterly expendable.