Kapoek Sid

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@pastorcoin Sadly not available on Google Play in Indonesia

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@markkaplan20 @threadreaderapp unroll

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@markkaplan20 @threadreaderapp unroll

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@markkaplan20 @threadreaderapp unroll this insightful thread

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@markkaplan20 @threadreaderapp unroll

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@markkaplan20 @threadreaderapp unroll

[Chris Boettcher @chrisboettcher9]

This is the chart the medical and drug community doesn’t want you to understand.

It shows hazard ratios (your risk of death) compared to total cholesterol levels for men and women.

👉 A hazard ratio of 1.0 = baseline risk.
👉 Above 1.0 = higher risk.
👉 Below 1.0 = lower risk.

Look closely and you'll see people with low cholesterol (100–150 mg/dL) have the highest risk of death.

Risk bottoms out (lowest mortality) around 200–240 mg/dL which is considered high cholesterol by today's "standards."

Risk rises again above ~280 mg/dL.

This is a hockey stick curve, not a straight line.

Yet the mainstream narrative is simple: “Lower cholesterol = better. Take your statins.”

But this chart destroys that myth. If low cholesterol really was the gold standard, why does risk of death nearly double at those levels?

Cholesterol isn’t the villain. It’s an essential molecule your body uses for:

• Hormone production (testosterone, estrogen, cortisol)
• Vitamin D synthesis
• Cell membrane integrity
• Brain and nervous system health

Statins suppress cholesterol across the board without addressing the real root causes of metabolic disease: processed food, inactivity, insulin resistance, obesity, stress, and poor sleep.

Healthy cholesterol isn’t about pushing numbers lower and lower. It’s about understanding how your body is metabolically functioning as a whole.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Pfizer board member, @ScottGottliebMD, you look foolish attacking @RobertKennedyJr on CNBC (links to clips below) because it’s clear you lack basic knowledge regarding vaccines. For example:

--Your claim that in “early 2000s … FDA reformulate[d] the existing MMR vaccine to take some of the preservatives out,” is false. Never happened. You are likely thinking about the removal of thimerosal in the early 2000s from various vaccines but as even CDC explains, “Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.” https://t.co/iTY7OH4hqW

--Your claim that a child “can’t get vaccinated [for MMR] until age 2” is simply false. MMR is routinely given at one year of age and sometimes even earlier. https://t.co/MW3i33Djbo

--Your claims regarding pertussis vaccines nonsensically ignore the fact that these products do not prevent transmission of the pertussis bacteria – they only provide, at best, personal protection. As a recent consensus paper of industry pertussis vaccine “experts” explained, “aPVs [pertussis vaccine] … cannot avoid infection and transmission. … aPV pertussis vaccines do not prevent colonization. Consequently, they do not reduce the circulation of B. pertussis and do not exert any herd immunity effect.” https://t.co/nlLg6dqvaJ

--Your claims regarding polio nonsensically ignore the fact that the last wild case of polio in the U.S. was in 1979 and that the only polio vaccine used in the U.S. for the last 24 years only provides, at best, personal protection and does not prevent transmission of the polio virus. As CDC explains: “IPV [inactivated polio vaccine] … does not stop transmission of the virus.” https://t.co/PmgbMEUZnn

--You claimed that “we [Pfizer] don’t make the pediatric vaccines, Pfizer is not in that market” to deflect the claim that, as a board member of Pfizer, you have a serious conflict of interest in attacking RFK Jr. regarding pediatric vaccines. But, as you no doubt know, Pfizer does sell pediatric vaccines, including the Prevnar vaccine given to babies at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age, which was one of Pfizer’s top three selling products in 2023. https://t.co/55luhUOK3O claim is either a lie or reveals deep ignorance.

--Your claim regarding measles mortality is based on dubious and unreliable data and ignores the facts that (1) approximately 400 people total died annually in the U.S. in the years before the first measles vaccine in 1963 (amounting to around 1 death for every 500,000 Americans), and (2) mortality from measles declined by over 98% from 1900 to 1960 before the vaccine and was continuing to decline. https://t.co/vNmbpUfigF. In any event, you dutifully ignore the fact that RFK Jr. has made clear he has no intention of taking away vaccines from anyone who wants them.

--You claim RFK Jr. will cost lives, but I would argue that ignorance regarding vaccine products does and has cost lives. I welcome a public debate in which we can discuss the number of lives ignorance about vaccines has cost versus your speculations about those RFK Jr. will supposedly cause (a man who has actually devoted his life to saving the lives of children).

Your knowledge regarding these products is only matched by your track record as a public “health” official. The plummeting decline in childhood health from the early 1980s (from less than 13% with chronic disease to now well over 50%) continued unabated while you were FDA commissioner. Respectfully, you lack authority or a track record, let alone basic knowledge, to speak on the subjects you address in this interview (let alone to discuss this topic with Senators to dissuade them from confirming RFK Jr.)

If you were being honest, you would reveal that your real concern, as a board member of Pfizer, is that Pfizer's golden gooses – Covid-19 vaccines, Prevnar vaccines, RSV vaccines, etc. – will have to face the reality of the devastating harms they have caused to families across America. Your interview stinks of self-interest. The time for selling out America's children so pharma and its leaders, like you, can line their pockets has come to an end.

The above responds to a recent CNBC segment on which you recently appeared and which you tweeted out in two parts:
https://t.co/plgnR9TpWk
https://t.co/plgnR9TpWk

[Tom Woods @ThomasEWoods]

https://t.co/VpssRHPSLQ

[Pierre Kory, MD MPA @PierreKory]

To sell statins, we're told cholesterol damages arteries—in reality, it repairs arterial injury. Statins hence don't prevent death and give 20% of users muscle, liver, or nerve damage.
If you know someone on a statin, please read @MidwesternDoc's article. https://t.co/TRqy20oZTK

[William Makis @MakisMedicine]

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN & FENBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 50s year old Stage 4 Cervical Cancer patient - CA125 drops 46% in 2 months on high dose protocol!

50s year old Stage 4 Cervical Cancer metastatic to liver patient (USA)

We started a Protocol early Sep.2024:

Ivermectin 2mg/kg/day (split over 2 doses)

Fenbendazole 2000mg/day (split over 2 doses)

Continue ongoing Tivdak (Tisotumab vedotin) (there was no improvement in CA125 on it so far)

(we switched Fenbendazole brands after a few weeks, when CA125 hit 99.1)

Results: 46% drop in CA125 in 1.5 months !

The picture of the CA125 trend is worth a thousand words!

I love what I do. 😃

Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@Investments_CEO Great. We're in.

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@eveforamerica @ezdubs_bot English Indonesia

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@paulsaladinomd @threadreaderapp unroll

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@paulsaladinomd @ezdubs_bot English indonesia

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@holmanm @threadreaderapp unroll

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@charliekirk11 @ezdubs_bot English indonesian

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@JackStr42679640 @ezdubs_bot English indonesian

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@mindmusclepro @BeBlack_coffee @shashiiyengar @arunkumar3112 @FITholic_Health @NishTWL @PramilaMundra @tiras_corner @MarkBski @threadreaderapp unroll

[Kapoek Sid @kapoek23]

@pln_123 lapor min. Saya coba isi token listrik berulang kali. Selalu muncul pesan gagal