I have worked on #NLProc for ~30 years; until recently most people did not understand or appreciate the nature of my work. Then came #ChatGPT.
I have been sharing some thoughts on this technology, and I am pleased to share them with you too!
https://t.co/RqRC1O3w3R
A new video for my YouTube channel, this one is about image manipulation in a Nature Neuroscience Paper by researchers at the University of Michigan.
https://t.co/h7y7ZlU7Rk
@fake_journals My approach: look at who cited papers. Start with a recently published paper with a high citation count. Take this 2025 paper with 13 citations. Look at "Cited by". Almost entirely author self-citations or highly nonspecific citations. A self-reinforcing citation network?
@JulioGonzalo1@sansalido@guillermomarco_ Here also we created a targeted test suite for negation. Controlled variation of examples gives insight into capabilities that a large benchmark cannot.
https://t.co/mtWxNvAEpj
@RMITComputing undergraduate student Milindi Kodikara presenting a paper based on her Honours project with me. She also graduated with First Class Honours for her Honours year.
Well done, Milindi!
Milindi Kodikara from @RMIT is presenting the long paper today at #ALTA2024 titled "Lesser the Shots, Higher the #Hallucinations: Exploration of Genetic Information Extraction using Generative Large Language Models", evaluating #LLMs on extraction of genetic information.
#NLP
@lpachter Do you have a sense of whether this was a true “innovation” or just a better information retrieval strategy? ie was it known just not to you?
@innovator_lc @ipfconline1@ConversationEDU@jblefevre60@Khulood_Almani@ahier I completely agree! That is the sweet spot, and where my own research has focused.
We made the same argument for clinical AI/NLP a few years ago. Support information needs, don’t replace critical thinking.
https://t.co/cZMuTSjk8S
As I said at #WCRI2024@WCRIFoundation and last week at @ANU_CPAS, #GenAI will enable bad actors in science to accelerate their contamination of scientific literature.
This has broad repercussions for trust in science, and there is a significant human toll, as reflected here.
Science is built on trust. What happens when someone destroys it?
My first feature for @_TheTransmitter investigates the emotional and existential fallout for one lab in the aftermath of a misconduct case.
https://t.co/xawx3J7mCC
@ARC_Tracker This is particularly troubling as AFAIK the sector has grown substantially in that time! This does not bode well for academic career progression.