Iranian here!
I want to thank American leftists for educating me these past few days & correcting my understanding of Iran & radical Islam
I almost trusted my own experience, my parents’ trauma, and what my family in Iran endures daily instead of your wisdom. What would I have done without your tweets & tiktoks ❤️
So, in our free world, they're imprisoning prosecuting lawyers so that criminals can remain free. If they did this, prosecution must have a hell of a slam-dunk case. Can we conclude that Gates, Bourla, von der Leyen and Schwab are all guilty?
@JonathanTurley Congressional immunity needs to be reconsidered.
Look at the waste/fraud that goes on, with no accountability.
No money manager can act without fiduciary responsibility, yet we have Congress in charge of the biggest budget in the world, with no such accountability.
FUN FACT: Zuckerberg's wife, Priscilla Chan, donated $750,000 to oppose the recall efforts against Newsom in 2021
Obviously they have the money to flee the consequences of their bad decisions, unlike most Californians
"Livestock is inefficient use of land" is the most successful propaganda of the 21st century.
Here's what they're not telling you: 70% of global agricultural land is unsuitable for crop production. Too steep, too rocky, too dry, too cold, wrong soil composition.
You cannot grow wheat on a Scottish hillside. You cannot grow soy on Argentine pampas grassland. You cannot farm vegetables in Mongolian steppes.
But you know what thrives on Scottish hillsides? Sheep. On Argentine grasslands? Cattle. On Mongolian steppes? Yaks and sheep.
Ruminants convert grass that humans cannot digest into meat, milk, and cheese that humans can digest. They're not competing with crops. They're utilizing land that would otherwise produce zero human food.
The "inefficient" argument only works if you pretend all land is equally suitable for all purposes. It's not. Most agricultural land is marginal for crops but perfect for grazing.
When you remove livestock from this land, you get: nothing. Not crops. Not forests. Just unused grassland producing zero human nutrition.
But admitting this would require acknowledging that cattle aren't stealing food from humans. They're creating food where crops cannot exist.
Can't have that conversation. Better to show graphics comparing "land used for livestock" vs "land used for crops" while pretending it's the same land.
It's not the same land. It never was. And they know it.
"Here's one to think about..."
"Instead of organic carrots having to be called organic carrots, maybe they could just be called carrots, and carrots grown with chemicals could be called chemical carrots?"
"And maybe those that grow with chemicals have to demonstrate and show the chemicals that were used in the production?"
"If that was on the supermarket packs, I wonder how our behaviour would change."
Credit: @greenearthorgan
Researchers have developed a sustainable fiber production system that could revolutionize the textile industry.
The technology:
- Grows annually without petroleum inputs
- Biodegrades completely in natural conditions
-Requires no microplastic-producing synthetic processes
- Provides superior insulation compared to petroleum alternatives
- Naturally flame-resistant without chemical treatment
- Can be produced on marginal land unsuitable for other agriculture
- Has sustained human populations through ice ages
The fiber is renewable, carbon-neutral, and lasts decades with proper care.
Environmental groups are campaigning against it in favour of polyester made from fossil fuels.
It's called wool.
From sheep.
Who apparently destroy the planet while plastic jackets save it.
Make it make sense.
A sheep eats grass on a Welsh hillside where nothing else will grow.
In return it provides:
- Wool (renewable clothing that biodegrades)
- Meat (complete nutrition)
- Lanolin (waterproofing, cosmetics, leather conditioning)
- Sheepskin (insulation, clothing, rugs)
- Bones (tools, broth, fertilizer)
- Manure (soil building)
All from grass on terrain too steep for tractors.
The environmental alternative is petroleum-based fleece that sheds microplastics, synthetic insulation made from fossil fuels, and importing food from industrial agriculture that destroys prime farmland.
But the sheep grazing on a cliff is the problem.
Make it make sense.
Yes, it was incredible. I have mixed feelings. I loved, of course, watching Trump, Lutnick, and Bessent blow it up unapologetically. But the duplicity from the Larry Finks of the world was nauseating.
Like it or not, the WEF has been revived-sold as a platform to bring both sides to the table. That’s simply not true. The WEF’s collectivist agenda is enshrined and will continue to be pushed across the public, private, and academic sectors. They won’t stop-they’re just learning to wear better camouflage.
Good job @MarkJCarney! Thank you for saying out loud (while licking CCP's boots) what we've know was the goal all along.
Good job Canadian electorate for putting this a$$-hat puppet in control of your beautiful country.
'Monosyllabic' is not.
‘Abbreviation’ is 12 letters.
‘Thesaurus’ doesn’t have a synonym.
'Non-hyphenated' is hyphenated.
Say what you will about English, but it has a sense of humor.
FLASHBACK
Serena Williams tells Letterman:
“Men’s & women’s tennis are completely different sports. If I played Andy Murray, I’d lose 6-0, 6-0 in 5 minutes…. It’s true.
He would kill me. Men are a lot faster, serve harder, and hit harder. I only want to play girls.”
.@JenniferSey NAILS IT: even if your daughter doesn't have a boy on her sports team or a man in her locker room, she's getting the message today from American culture that her rights matter less than a man's feelings.
"We are protecting the feelings and reputations of men and selling young girls down the river.
It's got a new face, cuz the guy's wearing a dress and says he's a woman, but it's the same thing.
Boys count more than girls. Men's feelings that they are girls counts more than a little girl who has been training her butt off to make the team.
It's the misogyny as old as time."
@ThomasSowell When I saw this I thought "is she selling a new book?" Well, how about that? She sure is. Has anyone else profited as much as this woman on being fat, losing weight, gaing and losing weight, and on others' weight loss dramas??