@ExposinChrisean@LettiJohns79040 It's hard to say why she does the things she does. If I had to guess, I'd say for attention & views. Also, we don’t know the baby's condition. Maybe he's disabled or has limited brain function and she considers that to be "dead" compared to his former healthy self. Who knows? 🤷♀️
@NameOWasBingo@hotandbravoed@factsdontlie10 This is so inappropriate. I would have expected this from FKR to be sore losers, if she'd been convicted, but I didn't expect them to be being sore winners too🤦♀️ Karen literally just got away with murder so just take the win and stop harassing innocent people.
@PuffedCactus @DemetraAutumn@JohnDePetroshow There's no doubt in my mind that Karen killed John. It was apparent from the evidence, both during the first trial & was presented even more clear during the second trial. Karen told us herself that she thought she'd clipped him, tagged him in the knee, or drove over his foot 🤷♀️
@kathrynlarsen86 @FrankFrank9494 @BostonDefender I'm not crying over it; after all, John was a stranger to me. But I do feel for his family & the innocent witnesses who've been harassed incessantly & yet gave their all, twice, to put a murderer behind bars, to no avail, due to tainting of the jury pool & witness intimidation🤷♀️
@GovernmentsNot@CoffindafferFBI@GittesJoe18784 They never said that. The only statement they ever made was that their investigation was closed. Do you know what that means; when an FBI investigation is opened into a matter, thoroughly investigated & closed without any indictments? It means your girl got away with muder.
@Gingey08 @karenreadai@IanRunkle Pornoprahic? Please... @BostonDefender Pornoprahic, as in; Material (images, video or text) intended to cause sexual arousal by depicting erotic material, sexual activity & nudity? So, criticizing jurors, some of which lied to get on the jury, is pornoprahic now? What's next?🤦♀️
@CWvKR_22117 @FrankFrank9494 @BostonDefender They don't have an infinite number of strikes. It's limited to a certain amount. As far as the civil case goes, whatever gives you the idea that it will be settled out of court? 🤔
@CWvKR_22117 @FrankFrank9494 @BostonDefender Well, if they all lied to get on the jury, like Paula, that's irrelevant. Having said that, I don't want to see the verdict overturned because John's family's already been through more than enough grief & because, like O.J., Karen will undoubtedly be found guilty in civil court.
@mzkarmaD @FrankFrank9494 @BostonDefender Either side can only strike a finite number of jurors. Between 80-90% of the jurors were already aware of the case so they were left with 10-20%, who either live under a rock or lied to get on the jury. This case, like Kohberger's, should have been moved out of Deadham.
@kathrynlarsen86 @FrankFrank9494 @BostonDefender A large number of people were summoned, at random, for jury duty in this trial. 80–90% of them had heard of or followed it. That means all of those people knew they'd be harassed if they found her guilty. That leaves 10–20% who, in spite of that, still wanted to serve on the jury
@CWvKR_22117 @FrankFrank9494 @BostonDefender The lawyers can only strike so many jurors. Sadly, this was bound to be a hung jury, not-guilty or this bs OUI charge. Your jury system's broken. Very few stay because it's their civic duty, so the smartest jurors find ways to get out of it & then you're stuck with what's left 🤷♀️
@Jakesun55@BostonDefender Hehe, I like the visual. But she's way to spoiled to ever take out the trash. She'd have to come up with another excuse for it to even be plausible 🤭 Walk the dog maybe? (Oh wait, no, she hates dogs) Mow the lawn, maybe? 🤔 I mean, she is the queen of the weedwackers after all.