@iambolar@bayosings Shifting the goalpost ~ that's what y'all do. But it's okay for the Netherlands to score in min 102' right? We can all start cherry picking moments to fit our scandalous narrative. lol
Some of you are late to the party.
I decided who my GOAT is after this was allowed and his fans celebrated eitherway.
I knew i could not be part of any form of injustice.
Maybe it's time to activate the clause?
According to reports, Atlético Madrid’s former sporting director Andrea Berta was unable to fully convince Julián Álvarez about the club’s long-term project. Miguel Ángel Gil Marín reportedly had to step in personally, alongside an intermediary party that played a major role in facilitating the deal and persuading the player to join, but only under specific conditions.
Alvarez agreed to the Atlético project, but he also wanted guarantees to protect his future. In simple terms, he did not want to be locked into a contract until 2030 without a realistic pathway out, especially if the sporting project failed to meet expectations or if a major club he wished to join came forward in the future.
While the official release clause in his contract is publicly known to be €500M, reports claim there is also a private internal clause that could allow him to leave for a significantly lower fee, believed to be between €80M and €90M.
The clause reportedly depends on several conditions being met, including:
- Julián formally requesting to leave.
- Atlético Madrid failing to win a European title within a certain timeframe.
- A condition linked to the club’s sporting ambition and investment, where the player could potentially activate the clause if Atlético’s net transfer spending falls below an agreed threshold, suggesting the board failed to support the project as promised.
If those conditions are fulfilled, the situation would no longer be fully under Atlético’s control.
The agreement reportedly gives the player’s representatives, particularly Juanma López, the ability to bring offers within the €80M–€90M range. Should a formal proposal arrive at that valuation, Atlético would allegedly be forced into negotiations rather than hiding behind the €500M release clause.
This could explain Atlético Madrid’s frustration earlier today following leaks surrounding the file, and why they put out unofficial statements, mentioned by Reshad, as Barcelona are now showing serious interest in the operation. Atlético have no desire to strengthen a direct La Liga rival.
So far, Julián Álvarez has not attempted to activate any clause out of respect for Atlético and its supporters, something the club reportedly values highly.
However, if Atlético refuse to genuinely negotiate, the situation could become very complicated because the player may possess a strong contractual mechanism capable of changing the entire dynamic of the deal.
Gil Marín reportedly accepted these conditions from the beginning because, even in the worst-case scenario, Atlético would still avoid suffering a financial loss, considering the possible exit fee is close to the €75M they originally paid Manchester City to sign him.
This is clearly why Barcelona, and Laporta have maintained that Barcelona can afford the deal, and only needs Alvarez to make a "Gesture". It looks like the €100m first bid will be enough to do it.
https://t.co/K7XPO4JtDi
I'm also gonna go ahead and guess that this first version of Siri AI will not let me change default apps. Like adding things to Google calendar instead of Apple calendar. Or sending Whatsapp messages instead of iMessages. Or Navigating with Google Maps instead of Apple Maps. I'd like to be wrong though.
@EmzyGadgets You sell gadgets but spew a lot of bullshit. After how many failed attempts?. You think they are gonna beat Samsung and Google in one iteration? They even patterned with Google this time to make it look decent. And y'all are gonna make it look superior just like that ? Smh
@SkylarksPlace Unlike others (i.e GeekBench, 3Dmark), Power and efficiency metrics like PPW, PPC, TFlops e.t.c. are impossible to evaluate. And the results are not cross-platform . For Example you can't compare Android scores to Apples' or Windows PCs with Antutu like the rest.
@SkylarksPlace No disrespect it's just an aggregate benchmark that doesn't truly evaluate a phones performance. For Example the Exynos 2600 on the S26/s26+ has by far the best GPU on mobile currently, upto 7Tflops FP32. But ANTUTU is the only Graphics benchmark that thinks not...
@arojinle1 It is updating in the background I think. Does that on every Android I've used. Give it time and it'll be stable. You can also clear the cache if it persists
@mustakeemsanusi@SkylarksPlace 888 is notorious for being a toaster, but still the overall superior gaming chip (CPU is worse tho). The GPU drivers are top tier, the 7 Gen series are below tier. The GPU suffers from low bandwidth too
@luancastro_lc@SPYGO19726@techkeyz333@4k_isn Yes a wrapper- an interlacer that improves the original system driver by adding missing features/ extensions, It's still a driver,
I mean the code from the decompiled Xclipse system driver was used in enabling Native BCn in many wrappers(leegao, vortex).
@luancastro_lc@SPYGO19726@techkeyz333@4k_isn Exynos Tools only works on the 2400 according to some testers and even in seletcted emus (,Gamenative, Ludashi). I'm more interested in the driver decompiling than anything. Let's see what good is gonna come out off it
@luancastro_lc@SPYGO19726@techkeyz333@4k_isn And also using AI doesn't necessarily make one a bad developer. I write code myself jsyk. If he were a total novice then the AI complains would be justified but here I don't totally think it makes the code low quality.