If Christians infight carnally we can't show the world who Jesus is.
But, if we fail to call out the frauds and deceivers that seek stages and power in the name of Christ we lose our moral voice and will end up showing the world who Jesus isn't, in the form of Benny Hinns.
Muslim TRIES TO SCHOOL Christian Using CHATGPT... And GETS COOKED
Right now, somewhere in the world, someone is hearing about Jesus for the very first time.
Not millions. One person. With a name. With a story.
With a life that will never be the same.
You're watching this for a reason.
─────────────────────────────────────
Help Support Digital Social Hour:
https://t.co/N0raEvYxcU
Relevant Articles / Sources:
Are Jews and Christians Mushriks according to the Quran?
https://t.co/uVy5SZJoXL
Jesus as the Son of God: A Biblical Exegesis
https://t.co/g7c2KLXYGW
Full Clip:
https://t.co/ErN8yPguCJ
(This channel is not run by those associated with the clips).
─────────────────────────────────────
HELP REACH THE UNREACHED
Partner Monthly:
https://t.co/FMow0ZwsdO
Join the Channel: https://t.co/E7fBRXjyRH
God Bless you for standing with this mission 🙏
OTHER RESOURCES
Get Yourself A Bible 🕊️ — https://t.co/N0bLMbEIa9
Cross Necklace ✝️ — https://t.co/JnDsZz99p5
Rosary ✝️📿 — https://t.co/UyWYIA7ejI
Best Supplements ❤️ — https://t.co/czWwp3zguf
My Fav Supplement Pack ❤️ — https://t.co/DwP0ezFfgb
#Islam #Quran #Muslim
No Muslim has never attempt to refute the ISLAMIC DILEMMA! This Muslim Apologist made it worst! Christian destroyed him completely.
This debate made MUSLIMS call him to retire 🙈
Defend ISLAM at your own risk.
Lies don’t last forever.
Come to JESUS now.
@InspiringPhilos
@SzymusiakJohn Jesus said that there would be people who healed in his name who he ends up casting into outer darkness and of whom he will say, "I never knew you, depart from me you workers of iniquity."
Muslim explaining why you’re supposed to kill anyone who leaves Islam and talks about it.
The primary victims of Islam’s terrorism are Muslims who realize it’s false and want to leave.
This isn’t fringe. This isn’t “radicals.” This is Islam in its true form.
Christians shouldn't ignore tough passages. However, saying that Mike deliberately left out parts of Scripture is a much stronger accusation than what you've shown so far.
First, Exodus 21:16 says that stealing and selling a person is punishable by death. Unlike Deuteronomy 24:7, Exodus 21:16 doesn't limit the victim to just Israelites. You can't just assume that the more specific wording in one law cancels out the broader wording in another.
Second, you mention Exodus 21:20–21 but stop before verses 26–27, which say that slaves who suffer certain permanent injuries from their masters must be set free. Does this make the system morally perfect? No, but it does challenge the idea that the law allowed unlimited violence.
Third, Exodus 21:4 and Leviticus 25:44–46 are tough passages. They make distinctions that many people today find hard to accept. But just because the Mosaic law set certain rules doesn't mean those rules show God's ultimate moral standard. Jesus himself pointed out that some things in the law were allowed because people were stubborn, not because that was God's original plan (Matthew 19:8).
Finally, look at Deuteronomy 23:15–16. It says not to return an escaped slave to his master and not to mistreat him. That passage is important to consider as well.
The Old Testament set rules for an ancient institution in a broken society. Christians don't claim that every rule in those laws shows the ideal way to live. Instead, we need to read those laws in their historical context and see them as part of the Bible's bigger moral story, which leads to Christ.
You ended by saying, "I don't know Hebrew, but I can read." Reading the text and interpreting it fairly are not the same. Also, accusing someone of quoting selectively while leaving out important passages yourself doesn't help your argument.
@MikeWingerii Exodus 21:16 matters in any honest discussion of slavery: kidnapping a person and selling him was a capital crime. That doesn’t make every Old Testament passage simple, but it does rule out treating man-stealing as something Scripture approved.
Did you know this was in the Old Testament?
“He who kidnaps a man and sells him, or if he is found in his hand, shall surely be put to death."
Exodus 21:16
Islamic cleric: In Islam, women are animals like cows and sheep.
God only made them look pretty so men wouldn’t be afraid of them.
Their only purpose is to service men. This is the Islamists mindset.
To be clear, it’s inescapable that the pope got the Bible wrong because multiple popes have said opposite things about the death penalty in regards to the Bible. Not just different things. Inescapably contradictory things. This has happened many times in history so the current example is not the only one. But there are a ton of times where you simply have to choose which pope is wrong, not whether the pope is wrong.
And it seems to me that even Catholics can’t agree if the current pope is right or if they just want to say he’s wrong but it’s OK because his statement wasn’t infallible.
“And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward.” - Matthew 6:5
Je partage :
Quand certains musulmans en Occident accusent nos sociétés de “manquer de tolérance”, il est parfois utile de rappeler l’histoire concrète — pas celle des slogans, mais celle des faits.
Ce tableau, daté de 1595 et conservé au Musée national de Serbie, représente une scène bien réelle de la domination ottomane dans les Balkans : l’évêque orthodoxe serbe Teodor de Vršac y est écorché vif, encore conscient, par des soldats ottomans, pour avoir refusé de renoncer à sa foi chrétienne.
Il ne s’agissait pas d’un acte isolé ni d’un excès ponctuel.
Les sources historiques montrent que, dans l’Empire ottoman, les chrétiens qui refusaient la conversion à l’islam pouvaient être soumis à des supplices
Extrêmes et exemplaires :
— écorchement à vif
— empalement
— décapitation
— bûcher
— démembrement lent
— sciage en deux
L’objectif était clair : terroriser, forcer des conversions, ou éliminer les récalcitrants.
Les musulmans de Bosnie et du Kosovo aujourd’hui sont, pour une large part, les descendants de Serbes, de Croates et d’autres chrétiens slaves convertis au fil des siècles.
Leurs ancêtres ont été confrontés à l’épée, au fouet, à l’esclavage, aux viols, aux mariages forcés, à l’enlèvement d’enfants par le système du devshirmé — qui arrachait des garçons chrétiens à leurs familles pour en faire des janissaires — ou précisément à ce type de torture, jusqu’à ce qu’ils se convertissent pour survivre ou qu’ils soient mis à mort.
Ce n’est pas une « diffusion pacifique de la religion ».
C’est une conquête par la violence, une conversion sous la terreur, un effacement culturel et religieux systématique.
Rappeler ces faits n’est pas de l’intolérance envers les musulmans d’aujourd’hui.
C’est refuser l’amnésie historique et la leçon de morale à sens unique.
Les sociétés occidentales actuelles permettent à l’islam d’être pratiqué librement.
Ce tableau rappelle que, dans l’histoire, la réciproque n’a pas toujours été vraie.
Le tableau ne ment pas.
La scène qu’il représente ne ment pas.
L’histoire ne ment pas.
“I’m not always morally depraved, but when I am, I’m smug about it.”
Why is it that they will murder children who have no uterus but those same kids, if they grow up, have no permission to speak up for those who are being slaughtered by their mothers?
Men, speak up!