yourhuckleberry

Jesus first. Homeschool advocate. SAHM. Holistic and natural wellness enthusiast. Politically homeless.

[Royce White 🇺🇸 @Highway_30]

I haven't even been publicly trans for 72 hours and I'm already getting so much hate.

I just want to hoop with my girls in my feminine era! Why can't y'all be happy for me? 💅🏽

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@FeminaStudiosa Absolute truth. Young, engaged, and fresh out of college I heard so much “he’ll get sick of having sex with you and find someone else”, or “you’ll divorce at least once”. Precious few congratulatory remarks or encouragement. 16 years later i still think about those comments.

[Pro America Politics @proamericapol]

In 1998, Serena and Venus Williams said they could beat any man ranked outside the top 200 in the men's division.

So, little known and 203rd ranked men's player Karsten Braasch took them up on the challenge.

Braasch after a night of drinking and smoking with zero practice, destroyed Serena 6-1 and Venus 6-2 in straight sets.

The Williams sisters are the greatest female athletes of all time. And they barely made Braasch break a sweat.

It wasn't because Braasch was very good. He wasn't.

But, as a male, he possesses biological advantages even the best female athletes can't compete against.

That's the very reason we established women's sports to begin with.

To even the playing field.

That shouldn't be controversial. And you shouldn't need a biology degree to understand it.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Novak, Aaron, and Kyrie risked everything by refusing the advice of ‘Dr. Fauci’ and were ridiculed for doing so. They proved that the best role models for children are those brave enough to stand alone when the world demanded obedience…

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Interesting comments coming in regarding the medical examiner’s report on Charlie.

Things are certainly going to get interesting.

Just how magical was this bullet?

[Julian Assange @ImJulianAssange]

Well this didn't age well

[Bret Weinstein @BretWeinstein]

Sad Little Man was a song well ahead of its time. Now that the world is catching on to what kind of person Anthony Fauci actually is, it should spread like wildfire. Let’s make that happen.

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@gabseunagal Oof. So much to unpack here. Nope, I’m not touching it. Gonna save the siphoning of energy it would require for my gorgeous husband and 4 awesome kids. ✌️

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

While you wait for Fauci’s hearing to start, a reminder that when the U.S. government purchased Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, it contractually agreed to keep the PREP Act immunity in place for as long as their vaccines are administered in the United States.

What that means is that the U.S. government promised Pfizer and Moderna that it could not be sued for harms from its Covid-19 vaccines, irrespective of whether an emergency continued to exist.

But not only did our government contractually agree that Pfizer and Moderna can harm and kill Americans with impunity, it also guaranteed Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars for this privilege.

Even worse, the U.S. government guaranteed this immunity in July 2020, months before it first authorized Covid-19 vaccines in December 2020. Meaning, the U.S. government pre-guaranteed these companies immunity from any harm caused by their products, thus, knowingly undermining any incentive for them to create a safe product.

And how much were Pfizer and Moderna guaranteed to be paid by the U.S. government to develop a product that could harm its own citizens with impunity? A total of over $21 billion just in the initial rollout -- $8.63 billion for Moderna and $13.15 billion for Pfizer.

Sound unreal? See the actual contracts for yourself linked in my most recent restack.

The Fallout

The implications are incredible.

To start, Pfizer and Moderna could sue the U.S. government for breach of contract and potentially other relief if PREP Act immunity is terminated before the United States’ use of their COVID-19 vaccines ceases.

Only in an upside-down world would the U.S. government siphon over $21 billion of its citizen’s taxpayer dollars to Pfizer and Moderna and pre-guarantee a profit-motivated company sweeping immunity for harms its product causes to its own citizens.

Summing it up:

The U.S. government guaranteed Pfizer and Moderna immunity for injuries from their products before they were even developed, thereby eliminating the incentive for these companies to make their product safe. Worse, it gave these companies billions of dollars of its citizens’ money to develop these products, and even more incredible, it then spent billions more of its citizen’s money to promote Pfizer’s product as “safe and effective.” And in an ultimate slap to its citizens, then it required them to be injected with this product under the threat of grave consequences, including expulsion from school, losing their job, discharge from the military, etc.

Who is Being Protected?

Who exactly is the U.S. government working for? Whose interests is it protecting?

Government agencies have a well-documented history of being captured by industry. It is known in political science as regulatory capture. In this case, the capture is by pharma and the degree of capture is unprecedented.

You, the collective citizens of the United States, have paid Pfizer and Moderna billions of dollars. You have paid with your taxes. You have paid with your bodies when you were injured without recourse against Pfizer or Moderna. You have paid with your right to freedom when you were forced to be injected with their products under penalty of losing basic civil rights, employment, or more.

And what have Pfizer and Moderna paid? Nothing. They instead raked in billions of dollars of your money as long as they developed a Covid-19 vaccine and were shielded from liability irrespective of how unsafe of a product they developed or how much harm it would cause the public that paid them.

The Solution

The above again brings into focus why no medical product should ever be mandated. This assures you can say “no” if you don’t want a product developed with pre-guaranteed immunity for harms. “No” where its clinical trial had more deaths in the vaccinated group than the placebo group. “No” where it generates over $55 billion in revenue but its morally-bankrupt manufacturers won’t spend a dollar to compensate those injured.

Even if you support all current vaccines, masks, etc., there may come a day when you may not want to take a mandated medical product or procedure. When that day comes, it may be too late to recapture the rights you have surrendered. Rights lost are rarely retrieved. This is why, while everyone should be free to take any medical product, everyone should also be free to decline any medical product without penalty.

It should be that simple.

Take Action

To that end, I encourage you to send the following proposed legislation to your legislative representatives:

“No law may require or coerce a person to receive or use a medical product, or impose a penalty or deprive a benefit for refusing a medical product or refusing to disclose whether a person has received a medical product.”

Medical freedom is freedom. If you cannot get a job, go to school, play sports, sit in a restaurant, or otherwise participate in civil society because you refuse a medical product, then what good are your rights if you can exercise them only at home by yourself? That is why medical freedom is a fundamental right that must be permanently fixed into the law of every civilized nation.

Thank you to all the warriors, veteran and new, who join arms in the battle to secure this fundamental right. As aptly stated in the Declaration of Independence, we “are endowed by [our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights” and to safeguard those rights “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” We must never yield to the tyranny of permitting others to dictate what can or must be placed, administered, or injected onto or into our bodies. For once that right is ceded, none truly remains.

[Alex Jones @RealAlexJones]

The Official Charlie Kirk assassination story is now 100% dead!

Candace Owens just dropped powerful never before seen surveillance video of the Losee Center rooftop.

The video Owens released appears to be raw and unedited! This is the same footage that the court will not let the public see, that we are meant to believe is Tyler Robinson assassinating Charlie Kirk.

The individual does not look like Tyler Robinson.

The rifle is never pulled from his pants.

The person in the footage has no limp.

Nowhere do we see the shooter assembling the gun on the roof as we were told.

No recoil is seen.

He performs military maneuvers with precision as well as signaling before opening fire.

The official narrative just COLLAPSED…

[Andrew Zywiec, M.D. @AndrewZywiecMD]

There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism ...except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism:

▪️ https://t.co/9PBis1NeN0

▪️ https://t.co/BnGp3LHpNY

▪️ https://t.co/GZg2u91uyH

▪️ https://t.co/HxyJhJ9eTU

▪️ https://t.co/UxGxKAQhcJ

▪️ https://t.co/pMF2i9yH4L

▪️ https://t.co/0gN0fSNtKK

▪️ https://t.co/d3fELVQ3bO

▪️ https://t.co/nerRN2PiFm

▪️ https://t.co/z3Jr3j1L4T

▪️ https://t.co/dfXwUj6L37

▪️ https://t.co/rsAb6yiTp6

▪️ https://t.co/T7FGd5W39O

▪️ https://t.co/WB7eA9gfwb

▪️ https://t.co/CIApYvYcxV

▪️ https://t.co/gVt803ebzu

▪️ https://t.co/8aif6nRsWz

▪️ https://t.co/g8R2I7z9Rb

▪️ https://t.co/Ou4Op0TVgP

Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity and autism
▪️ https://t.co/cm2GtMLmYG

... and autism being listed in the inserts....

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@AndrewZywiecMD Total agree. It’s a very odd dynamic wherein you either accept the prescribed narrative or you are accused of being a Candace acolyte (which is supposed to be really shameful we are told) but never mind those of us who simply wish to question the myriad inconsistencies.

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@HodlFlorida Yay!!!!!!!! Similar journey for us. We now have 4! Praying this is the first of several happy announcements for you both. God is good!!

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@RickyTheGuido @dbongino @bennyjohnson @benshapiro @GrahamAllen @TheOfficerTatum Sadly, Allie Beth Stuckey and Eric Metaxas have been completely bamboozled by the whole TPUSA propaganda campaign too.

[Bret Weinstein @BretWeinstein]

People who are immediately certain of the official account of the death of any person with powerful enemies, can be safely ignored. It’s unsafe not to ignore them.

Conspiracies include coverups. There is no basis to be immediately certain of anything you did not personally see.

[Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111]

THERE IS ZERO FOOTAGE SHOWING TYLER ROBINSON SHOOTING CHARLIE KIRK — NONE

Watch this clip👇from the pretrial hearing—and please share it before this shameful LIE spreads any further.

#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @DonaldJTrumpJr @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JackPosobiec @joekent16jan19

[jay plemons @jayplemons]

Nick Shirley uncovers an adult day care in Flushing, Queens with 7,000 phantom members.

Nick: “This public document says you have 7,899 members.”

Employee: “No, we don’t have 7,000 members.”

Nick: “So you’re overbilling then? You’re getting paid $1,600 per patient — that’s how you got $12.9 million in 2024.”

Employee: “Please leave.”

American taxpayer dollars at work.

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@EmeraldRobinson @MrSausageGet Why was 10 in of soil removed from the crime scene immediately?

[yourhuckleberry @kellschuman]

@camhigby This is so weird. Cringy and weird. Candace isn’t the only reason people aren’t buying this narrative you all are selling. There are myriad inconsistencies that thinking people have identified with no help from Candace. Stop it.

[Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111]

Andrew

Let me offer advice.

Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.

When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.

Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.

That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.

Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.

Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.

You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.

That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.

So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.

Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.

You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith
@BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel