TIME TO ACT FOLKS!
Tell Your House Rep to VOTE ✅YES to @RepThomasMassie Amendment to REMOVE $3.3 Billion to Israel from the FY2027 National Security, State Department, and Related Programs (NSRP) Appropriations Act.
Vote is on Thursday, June 25!
Does Trump care to know who tried to kill him at Butler?
Does Trump care to know who killed Seth Rich?
Does Trump care to know which feds ran Jan 6th insurrection against him?
Does Trump care to know which feds raided his home?
Apparently not.
No corporate media outlets in America covered Tulsi Gabbard's release of documents on COVID and Fauci.
That's because America's corporate media outlets are controlled by America's intelligence agencies.
The Trump Admin should cancel their broadcast licenses.
@BrendanCarrFCC
Tucker is not the only one who is done supporting the Republican Party.
There is A LOT of us that are absolutely fed up and will not support a party that betrays its voters and country.
That does not mean we are turning into Democrats either.
But we are DONE with the America LAST Republican Party.
TPUSA, you may want to pay attention to this one.
April 26, 2026 the US Treasury said they were cracking down on tax exempt non profits, specifically those that "hide fraud, abuse, and extremist activity behind complicated nonprofit arrangements,” and said every tax-exempt organization should be able to show “who controls the money and where it goes.”
Let's talk fraud. Wire fraud is lying to get money, using a wire. Mail fraud is lying to get money, using mail services (USPS, FedEx, UPS, etc). That’s it. The legal name is 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Each email, each letter can be an instance of fraud, so ten misleading fundraising emails can be ten counts of wire fraud.
How a charity commits it:
A charity commits fraud when it raises or moves money on a false premise. The two classic versions:
(1) Telling donors one thing and doing another, ie you solicit money “to educate students,” then route it somewhere else.
(2) Self-dealing dressed up as charity, ie you move the money to companies and people connected to the insiders, and label it a “program expense” or a “vendor payment.”
Intent is what separates aggressive bookkeeping from fraud. But both are exactly what investigators like myself look for. Typically, red flags are identified, then Investigators would go in and pull the bank records, transfers, etc. and that's how it's proven.
Now let's look at some red flags I identified in TPUSA's filings that could flag an investigator to seek further documentation. This is not proof of a crime, this is a roadmap of where I'd recommend investigating if Treasury ever decided to.
- Red Flag #1: TPUSA raises over $85 million a year in tax-deductible donations to “educate students.” But based on my forensic examination of their 990s, only 63 cents out of every $100 reaches an actual student as a grant (and that's being generous). What they did is tag roughly $57 million as "grants" for their mission, but that $57M actually got parked in the organization’s own endowment, a savings account that’s grown to ~$70 million. (I have done a deep dive on this endowment and it's shady behavior if you want to go look a few posts back)
~$62.6 million, 95% of all their grants, went to entities the same people control. That’s the gap between their pitch to get donations and the actual use.
- Red Flag #2: A related Turning Point charity paid a Las Vegas shell company $999,000 for a “research project” with no product, at an amount $1,000 under the million-dollar line that triggers review. Vague service, no deliverable, dissolved vendor. This is the hallmark indicator of a fake invoice.
- Red Flag #3: Over $20M funneled back to insiders. $128,101 to a company owned by the treasurer, for t-shirts. More than $2.7 million to one staffer’s rotating LLCs. Fundraisers who kept more than they raised. And three private companies, Resolute Media, Superfeed, and TPUSA Merch, owned by the people who run the charity. TPUSA Merch and Resolute Media profit off the TPUSA name while not appearing on none of its books.
- Red Flag #4: No independent audit on an $85 million organization in 2024, and for years before that, the "independent auditor" was in a reciprocal business relationship with the co-founder, not very independent if you ask me. The control that’s supposed to catch all of this wasn’t there.
Those are just a few. So, now let's look at the charges an investigation would actually test.
These are the specific federal and tax exposures a prosecutor or the IRS would line this conduct up against:
(1) Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343). If donations were solicited over email/online on a false premise, or money was moved by wire as part of a scheme to deceive, each communication is a potential count.
(2) Mail fraud (§ 1341). The same idea for direct-mail fundraising.
(3) Conspiracy (§ 1349). If more than one person agreed to run the scheme.
- Filing false tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7206). A Form 990 signed under penalty of perjury that misstates how money was spent, or hides who controls it, is its own offense.
- Money laundering (§§ 1956–1957). Routing the proceeds through related entities to obscure the source and destination, the “conduit” pattern, is the textbook fact pattern.
- Private inurement / excess-benefit (IRC § 4958).Civil, not criminal, but powerful: the IRS can impose penalty taxes on insiders who got an improper benefit and on the managers who approved it, and can revoke tax-exempt status.
That’s the menu. Which, if any, applies depends on the one thing a public-records review can’t see: intent, and the bank records that prove it. That evidence lives behind a subpoena that would be part of any discovery.
Next up we have Rob McCoy and TPUSA Faith coming tomorrow, stay tuned.
This needs explanation. Israel is planning to assassinate Candace Owens just as Charlie Kirk?
This woman posted and deleted the post immediately, obviously posted too early while scheduling?
In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.
Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.
The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.
When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.
How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?
An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.
And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.
Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.
If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?
Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵
Angie Craig says her Senate campaign has not accepted any AIPAC PAC money in an attempt to distance herself from the toxic pro-genocide lobby.
Peggy Flanagan sets the record straight, noting that AIPAC has held over a dozen fundraisers specifically for Craig's Senate campaign, including one at the home of the head of AIPAC.
"AIPAC's candidate is Angie Craig." - @peggyflanagan
#MNSEN
Miriam Adelson's paper in Israel wrote this about Trump, "You made a colossal mistake. You failed by signing a surrender agreement." I understand why she's upset, this is Miriam's War. She ordered this war and didn't give us permission to leave. She expected Trump to stay bought.
What will it take for our lawmakers to cut the Israel cancer?
- DIA: Israel is the highest threat to US
- US Intel: Israel is sabotaging peace deal
- Israel News: Israel working with Israel agents in US to sabotage peace deal
The COVID injection-injured, like Cody, are being ignored by the media and the federal health officials who callously lied to the public.
They need to be seen, heard, and believed so they can receive effective treatment.
It’s the least the media and federal health officials can do.
While you were sleeping Israel murdered this beautiful family…
Using American bombs, paid for by the American taxpayer, under the full military and diplomatic cover of the American government.
And supposedly the best our pathetic president could do is call Netanyahu and *ask* him to “please stop.”