I am deeply sadden by the passing of Dr. Bommer. Dr. Paul Bommer was one of my favorite professors at UT Austin. Pragmatic, witty, snarky, kind, and he challenged us in such an engaging way.
The way he answered questions just made sense to me, a young kid that didn't know anything but thought he knew everything. He once taught me an excellent lesson on how to keep your boss (him in that case) informed with progress updates on projects, and how you get your butt chewed out when you don't!
I frequently use his words of wisdom and his stories with young engineers. He will always have a deep influence on my career and life, and I know many other UT petroleum engineering grads feel the same.
Dr Bommer, you will be missed.
If you're using Claude for Excel, handy tip... Claude doesn't really keep context between spreadsheets, but have Claude add a tab that details exactly what it did and how. If you have similar spreadsheets in the future, this provides a context memory for future sessions.
Update on my soccer automated camera system. Orig system had two cameras on a stand that allowed the angle between them to change, so every match the angle between cameras was different. This was a software headache to solve for the angle before combining the footage together. I decided to 3-D print a holder that fixes the cameras at exactly 90 degrees from each other- math and programming is much simpler. Solved through hardware instead of software in this case
This is the Cherokee generating station, which has a nameplate ~1,000 MW capacity and burns natural gas. Used to be coal, and was switched to reduce carbon emissions. Link to video: https://t.co/kbEApj6RKd
Xcel has been running this commercial with two guys talking about how solar is great- while walking through a nat gas CCG station. Maybe a subtle hint that the real answer is a mix of renewables and natural gas generation? Blink twice if that’s what you’re actually saying, Xcel!
So I'll take a serious stab at why Claude and other LLMs will consistently give the answer of "shut in middle east wells = permanent damage" which is not correct. And a general thought on LLM answers...
OPEC has a vested interest in not shutting in their production because that's how they make money. It's a helpful narrative to say "we can't shut in, or the wells will die". This gets repeated by news articles, politicians, etc because it sounds plausible. But there's a high chance it's not technically sound. LLM's train off of this data and create an inference response, predicting a most likely reply. It does not think critically about the nuance of a biased answer from OPEC, or whether the answer is technically competent. In this case, it magnifies what is likely misunderstood narratives of reservoir engineering.
Dan is a smart guy. We are all going to be more susceptible to this LLM heuristic trap going forward.
Over the past month, some of you reported Claude Code's quality had slipped. We investigated, and published a post-mortem on the three issues we found.
All are fixed in v2.1.116+ and we’ve reset usage limits for all subscribers.