There does not exist a single provision of the Constitution that implicitly uses the word "IMPEACHMENT in itself as grounds to bar anyone from vying for elective seats. Someni Article 99(2) with sub (3) and save yourself embarassment.
@NLagat45970@ahmednasirlaw Sufficiently in law? Is Article 145 of the Constitution that specifically deals with impeachment mere verbiage to you? Acquaint yourself with the multiple previous decisions of our courts on impeachment and the repeated holding that impeachment is a constitutional process.
@Hoeys_Consult@ahmednasirlaw@Asamoh_ Learn what quasi judicial means. Learn the bounds of Article 50 on fair hearing (even in civil matters) and the tie in to fair trial (even in civil matters).
@ahmednasirlaw If a non-derogable constitutional right can be violated without nullifying the resulting process, what exactly is non-derogable about it?
@AdamsGriffins@ahmednasirlaw It is not a hard question at all, because it is not one for consideration. The process was tainted and in the event, voided.
Under Article 25(c) of the constitution, the right to fair trial is a non-derogable right. So how can the court make quasi constitutional excuses on amorphous grounds in its refusal to set aside the impeachment of Hon Rigathi Gachagua? The Gachagua judgment in my humble opinion is on a shaky, shallow, soggy and sandy soil.