@BackupMalue Børn kan migrere til decentrale platforme som Nostr meget hurtigt.
Man skal indføre aldersgrænser på styre systemet hvis det skal batte noget.
Hvilken også kan blive svært med open source systemer som Linux.
@BitcoinErrorLog@nikitabier@Cernovich@toly Yes. X is the best centralized platform considering the alternatives.
However the graph decentralizes power, so I agree that they probably never implemented it.
Side note: The graph may be a great fit for AI to gain an identity and autonomously operate with humans.
@nikitabier@Cernovich@toly There’s a technology that can solve spam effectively and for good, it can even solve email spam as well without changing the protocol.
Just ask @BitcoinErrorLog
@BitcoinErrorLog Great explanation of a promising solution to the overloaded attention problem. For a deeper understanding of the first principles of trust, I did some thinking about it here.
https://t.co/onc01tVZ9c
@nikitabier A Web of Trust reputation system can solve all problems with spam and unwanted attention. Its a simple solution and easy to implement, but it may interrupt your advertising model and hurt your revenue from bots 🤷
@Polkadot Identity in a society is based on trust. Therefore trust in digital form needs to be decentralized before digital identity can break free of centralized control.
@1914ad A Decentralized Web of Trust Reputation system can solve the problem of censorship, spam and information overload on a global scale.
Only problem is that nobody likes it.
@thecivkit A decentralized web of trust reputation system enables a decentralized marketplace, as reputation acts as the collateral in a trade. It works in both directions, so sellers can even choose whom they will sell to based on the reputation.
No central authority controls the system.
@coloradotravis The problem is there’s no consequences for releasing bad/poor/fake information.
This makes it easy to drown good information and make it hard to find.
Even more so if it’s politically sensitive.
@dylanleclair Signing everything with a personal private key and publishing it on a web of trust system is only solution to be sure that the content hasn’t been manipulated and is trustworthy.
There’s no decentralized identity without a web of trust reputation system.
@nvk The problem is there’s no cost to online aggression. When every statement posted online comes with a stake on reputation, everything will change for the better.
@MDBitcoin A decentralized web of trust reputation system would fix this automatically by making the accounts untrustworthy and thereby become irrelevant very quickly e.g. no monetization opportunities.
@BitcoinErrorLog The killer feature is censorship resistance; whoever implements it best with as little inconvenience as possible will probably last the longest. X (Twitter) has a phone number, which puts them at a disadvantage.