A thought-provoking read. The decline of family formation is one of the defining social issues of our time, and yet it’s rarely discussed.
However, while the piece is right that for a generation of millennial and Gen Z women, having children has too often been treated as something that competes with freedom, ambition, and personal fulfillment rather than being a meaningful part of life — I’d put the roots of this problem a little differently. It’s less about Carrie Bradshaw or Hannah Horvath, and more about a generational pendulum swing.
Boomer women were the first generation to truly have the option of career and/or family after generations of women who did not. Many understandably raised their daughters with a strong message shaped by a new world of freedom and choice: be financially independent, build a career, don’t rely on a man, and don’t let motherhood limit your options. Pop culture reflected and encouraged that message, but didn’t create it.
The result was a generation of women handed a powerful vision of independence and career primacy — one that brought real opportunity and freedom, but also came at a cost: motherhood lost status.
For millennials and Gen Z, what many of us absorbed wasn’t just that we could have careers—it was that in our 20s, we should prioritize education, career, travel, fun, financial security and self-development first, with family prioritized later—if at all.
Then our 30s arrived, and many women discovered that the biological clock is real: fertility declines, energy is lower, relationships are more complicated, and trying to “have it all” is far harder than we were led to believe.
And of course culture isn’t the only factor. Layer on housing costs, affordability pressures and high taxes, an ultra-competitive job market, workplaces still largely built around a one-income/one-full-time-parent model, and a culture that has not prepared enough men for the realities of husbandhood and fatherhood (another equally important issue, rarely discussed), and it’s no surprise so many women feel torn, delayed, and burnt out.
The article makes an important point: a life ordered entirely around material success is not, for many people, a deeply fulfilling one.
Personally, no one —not school, university, pop culture, or even my own mother — ever taught me that motherhood might become the most meaningful part of my life. Like many women, I had to discover that myself. Historically, that is a remarkable shift: for most of human history, motherhood and childbearing were understood as central to family and societal continuity. In much of the modern West, by contrast, motherhood is often treated as secondary to other forms of achievement and self-development.
And it’s important to note that becoming a mother is not always as simple as just deciding to do so. Meeting the right partner, having financial stability, and being fertile are not givens. Combine that with a generation of women who weren’t necessarily taught that childbearing is both time-limited and a virtuous option worthy of intentional life planning, and it is no surprise that many women who wanted children have found themselves running out of time, or missing that window altogether.
For me, this isn’t about telling women they should stay home or give up careers. Nor is it about suggesting motherhood is every woman’s calling. It’s about restoring motherhood to a place of equal honour.
One day, when my daughter is asked what she wants to be when she grows up, if she says “a mom,” I hope she receives as much encouragement as if she said doctor, teacher, or business owner. She should have the freedom to choose children first, an ambitious career later, both, or neither.
Motherhood should once again be spoken of as something beautiful, aspirational, and worthy of admiration — not as something that gets in the way of a woman becoming who she is. Embracing motherhood as part of that becoming is what has been lost, and that’s what needs fixing.
केतन अग्रवाल के केस में दो प्रसिद्ध थ्योरी fail होती दिख रही हैं
१.एक कि अमीर लड़का हो तो लड़की ठीक रहती है
२.दूसरा जल्दी शादी करने से एडजस्ट करने में दिक्कत नहीं आती।
लड़कियों को चाहिए क्या, वही तय नहीं है,कितनी भी थ्योरी लगा लीजिए।
The Emperor Has No Clothes: Why the AI Infrastructure Buildout Math Doesn't Work
I have to give IBM CEO Arvind Krishna credit. He's saying what many of us in this industry have been thinking but haven't been willing to say out loud. The math just doesn't add up.
Here's what I'm seeing that's deeply troubling. We're in the middle of another mass hallucination. Just like the dot-com bubble, just like blockchain, just like the metaverse — everyone is convinced that building massive data centers will automatically create massive wealth.
But here's the thing about building infrastructure. You actually have to sell what's inside it.
Let's talk numbers. The planned data center buildout over the next 5-10 years is staggering. We're talking about commitments in the hundreds of gigawatts globally. The capital expenditure commitments are in the trillions. Yet when you look at the actual demand signals, not the projections, not the potential, but the actual consumption patterns, there's a massive gap. These AI companies are betting everything on demand that simply doesn't exist at the scale they're planning for.
Let me be direct. AI services are expensive. Enterprise adoption is slow. Consumer AI is still finding its footing. And the compute requirements being promised by the hyperscalers require a level of demand that would represent a fundamental shift in how businesses consume technology. That's a big ask.
I've seen this pattern before. The overbuilding. The belief that if you build it, they will come. The groupthink that turns critical analysis into heresy. The result is always the same. Companies are going to touch the stove. We're going to see massive write-downs. We're going to see pivots, shutdowns, and strategic reviews. We're going to see companies that spent years and billions trying to be the AI infrastructure leader become case studies in how not to read a market.
The IBM CEO is right. The math doesn't work. And unlike 1999, we don't have the excuse of we didn't know. We know exactly what's happening. We just don't want to believe it because the alternative, being a skeptic while everyone else is piling in, feels like career suicide. It's not. The ones who survive the next decade will be the ones who built for reality, not fantasy.
Wake up. The emperor has no clothes.
As reported by Futurism, Krishna laid out striking calculations: a 1 gigawatt data center costs roughly $80 billion today. If one company commits 20-30 gigawatts, that's $1.5 trillion in capital expenditure. The total commitments across the industry for chasing AGI are approximately 100 gigawatts, equaling $8 trillion. To break even, you'd need $800 billion in profit just to cover the interest. That's not investment. That's hoping.
https://t.co/4DAnF5OPfa
#IGR: External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has become an unexpected internet sensation after his candid smile during Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's latest "Melodi" exchange went viral.
Good points by Jeff Bezos. Think in terms of the future, work for the future, make a few big decisions. Don't waste time taking too many decisions and getting caught up in small things. This is how successful people and top level executives work.
I think Gen-Z having lower IQ than previous generation (as shown by studies) may have to do with lower consumption of Iodized salt. Iodine deficiency is the most preventable cause of intellectual disability. In previous generations, we generally ate iodized salt. But nowadays, that's decreasing thanks to a lot of different fancy salts flooding the market.
Pregnant women especially need iodine more than usual for brain development of fetus. But are they getting enough? Are public health agencies of countries still monitoring and ensuring their public are getting enough iodine? Do you still consciously buy and consume iodized salt?
AS-Modi doctrine. ( Btw totally opposite to CM Mayawati-Jayalalitha policy who had more of knee jerk n short sighted approach to deal with their political adversaries )