What would you rather receive from an AI coding agent?
"Done."
or
"Done. I changed these 7 files, rejected these 2 approaches, and here's what could still break."
Your AI agent asks for permission to run a command.
You approve it.
Then it asks permission for the next 47 commands.
At what point did "human in the loop" become "human clicking Allow"?
The โDoneโ is becoming the easiest part of prompt engineering.
The real engineering starts when you ask what happens under failure, how state is protected, how payments are reconciled, and whether the system can be trusted six months later.
Generating software is getting cheap. Verifying it isn't.
The โDoneโ is becoming the easiest part.
The real engineering starts when you ask what happens under failure, how state is protected, how payments are reconciled, and whether the system can be trusted six months later.
Generating software is getting cheap. Verifying it isn't.
Lets connect.
Independent testing is becoming a critical layer of AI security.
A lab can test its own safeguards, but an external team can challenge the assumptions the lab didn't know it was making. AISI's recent evaluations show why that separation matters.
@business@parmy@opinion Independent testing is becoming a critical layer of AI security.
A lab can test its own safeguards, but an external team can challenge the assumptions the lab didn't know it was making. AISI's recent evaluations show why that separation matters.
Lets connect.
A zero-day is discovered in a dependency used by your production system.
The patch is available.
Would you:
โ Deploy immediately
โ Test first
โ Isolate the vulnerable component
โ Wait for vendor guidance
The strangest thing about AI coding:
The more capable the model becomes, the less impressive the generated code looks.
The interesting part becomes what you ask it to build.
What's a better developer investment in 2026?
โ Learn another framework
โ Learn systems programming
โ Learn AI agents
โ Learn security
โ Learn all of the above