@NUndeserved@truth__ful@KAlbosta@Siya_22100 That was a very patronising post for someone who's failed to understand that the question was written to be deliberately vague in order to generate more responses ๐คฃ
@KAlbosta@Siya_22100 Or it could possibly mean divided by half of 100 (aka 50)... it's intentionally written this was to generate more responses though so you could argue it's very well written ๐คฃ
@jan_sobieski83@PeterWaite14@MatthewStadlen Spot on - Brexit delivered a rampant surge in unchecked small boat crossings and one of the biggest hits to our economy ever... what a legacy
@SusanCowell@Nic_Corr@FarRightThugs Your rationale makes no sense at all - even if you genuinely believe that drinking bleach or rubbing stinging nettles in your eyes or whatever the hell you're on about is more effective than surgery and chemo you'd still have to know whether or not you had cancer first ๐คฃ๐คฃ
@BhattiLaib9960 I'm curious to know if you post things like this because you know they'll drive engagement or if you're genuinely surprised when you get hundreds of comments back from people taking the piss out of you?