Kellie G vs Babylon

I was a lost sheep and Jesus brought me home!

[🌺 𝓚𝓮𝓵𝓵𝓲𝓮 🌺 @KObregonWriter]

The devil will lure you with everything in his arsenal right now because he knows his time is rapidly running out‼️ Jesus Christ will throw him in the lake of 🔥 forever! Nothing he can do to stop it!

[Kellie G vs Babylon @kgetzi]

@_prettyrestless Yes ❤️

[Lloyd Legalist @LloydLegalist]

I can imagine this being sung as I’m saying goodbye to my loved ones and God is tuning my ears to the music of home.

[Kellie G vs Babylon @kgetzi]

@IAmLilRico Muncie Indiana

[Kellie G vs Babylon @kgetzi]

@RealEmirHan This is my favorite movie of all time. Just ra watched it last week

[Kellie G vs Babylon @kgetzi]

@TheCinesthetic

[Steve Deace @SteveDeaceShow]

Indeed, nothing says "narcissistic" quite like washing the grimy feet of others, taking a beating you didn't deserve for others, and dying a gruesome death to be the atoning sacrifice for your enemies as I once was and Joy Behar sadly still is.

[🌷 LIZZIE🌷 @farmingandJesus]

Elijah asked the idolaters if their god was on the toilet.

[𝔇𝔞𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔩 𝚟𝚜 𝔅𝔞𝔟𝔶𝔩𝔬𝔫 @DanielvsBabylon]

Every day you brush your teeth, shower, comb your hair, etc for your physical self. But every day you must also pray, read the Bible, and carry your cross for your spiritual self.

[🌺 𝓚𝓮𝓵𝓵𝓲𝓮 🌺 @KObregonWriter]

the original true search engine

[Five Times August @FiveTimesAugust]

On the plus side this mass free fall into chaos and insanity has made reading and understanding the Bible easier than it’s ever been.

[The Middle-earth Mixer @MiddleearthMixr]

they’ll throw anything at the wall before saying we’re Image bearers

[SpurgeonBooks @SpurgeonBooks]

“We are free from punishment and we never need quake on account of it.”

— Charles Spurgeon

[Talk Church @churchtalkative]

This is *impossible* for anyone but Jesus | Josh Howerton

[Kellie G vs Babylon @kgetzi]

@DanielvsBabylon Amen

[Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86]

JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone.

Workers in Kenya are watching the footage.

Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents.

The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything.

Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now.

The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not.

Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated.

Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter.

This is not a bug. This is the business model.

The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design.

Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed.

Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it.

Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process.

The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces.

Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock.

The glasses are selling faster than ever.

The contractors keep watching.

And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.