Finally completed MVCC part https://t.co/VZdWpTZa2p
took me lot of time , while volume of code is low, depth is insanely high. Too many things being inter related and complex concurrency logic
https://t.co/Y5ovrBD8gS
This is custom basic arena allocator, I wrote after going through ginger bill aricle in modern c++ and integrate directly with the STL via std::pmr::memory_resource.
article link:
https://t.co/oIaro42p9R
code link
https://t.co/Xuj7GXRu90
github link:
https://t.co/ajlhkKYelJ
This is custom basic arena allocator, I wrote after going through ginger bill aricle in modern c++ and integrate directly with the STL via std::pmr::memory_resource.
article link:
https://t.co/oIaro42p9R
code link
https://t.co/Xuj7GXRu90
github link:
https://t.co/ajlhkKYelJ
this is so retarded, in 1900 electrical lines,railway ,steel etc were the latest tech , even then they focused on research , read some history for god sake
India's billionaires "only" build FMCG, services and low-end junk. This is supposed to be the national embarrassment: no frontier science, no deep tech, just coconut oil and quick-commerce.
So look at the US at the exact income India has now. India's GDP per capita is $2,800; adjust for inflation and that is America around 1900. Here is what American capital was building at that income level:
US Steel (the first $1B company). Standard Oil. The Pennsylvania, New York Central and Union Pacific railroads. Amalgamated Copper. American Sugar Refining. American Tobacco. Western Union. Not one frontier-science company in the top 20; a sugar refiner and a cigarette maker sat inside it.
Railroads, oil, steel, copper, sugar, tobacco, telegraph. Commodities, infrastructure, FMCG and services. The "boring" stuff was the deep tech of its era; capital-intensive, monopoly-prone, nation-defining. GE and AT&T only scaled once America was 3-4x richer.
India is on schedule, not behind. Frontier tech is what you buy after you cross the income line, not before.
This one something i learn after a while,for some reason lot of tutorial straight up don't bother to say this.
Also at compiler level , it does consider temperory values are considered r value
So it's a mixed of library level implementation + what compiler consider what type of values is something.
@AdamRackis never understood the love for doing everything in cli, everytime i tried i feel like i am caged , certain things are definitely nice but i still use gui as my main