retvrn

Northman and Certified Island Man who can’t help but notice.

[retvrn @kingcat1996]

@Heathen_Geek @HistoryBro1 @lotuseaters_com We aren’t just a set of values any African can become.

We are an ethnicity that happens to be white and we demand we rule ourselves and our homeland.

[Anglo-Saxon @AngloSaxon85]

In England, if you’re Sudanese you can get arrested for assaulting two people whilst already on bail and still not be remanded but if you’re English and throw a cone towards the police you instantly get remanded for crown court sentencing…

[Commie Gibberish of the Day @CommieGibberish]

I could write up some big long argument but honestly this picture of some moon-faced Paki midget in cop’s garb is the strongest argument to halt and begin reversing everything. 🤚🏻🛑🫵🏻

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

@spectator Jawad Iqbal wants to know what business outsiders have in England.

That's a very good question.

What business do outsiders have in England?

[retvrn @kingcat1996]

Reminder they know how it works they just don’t want white people to do it to them.

[La esquina de Char @CharmandAznable]

Que curioso que ISIS amenace al papa justo cuando presenta una postura tajantemente anti-Israel

[Brett @noimnotabot9]

@Babygravy9 Every man who grew up in the UK knows this face. Schools, workplaces, everywhere.

[Dominic Cummings @Dominic2306]

Davey supported all the mad bullshit over BLM, convicted criminal George Floyd, ‘structural racism’ and all the maddest bullshit from the maddest parts of California’s communist loony bin.
He supported all the changes to police and every other institution which have made us an international joke.
He supported the Boriswave and the importing of thousands of sex criminals.
He supported the continued coverup of the grooming Gangs which is why he wants to ban X and impose censorship.
Davey Starmer etc need censorship so they can continue importing millions from Africa and the worst parts of South Asia.
Until we retire them they will continue wrecking the country

[𝕭𝖗𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖎𝖆 @emanonedits]

> grooming gang ringleader was Sikh

[Andy @PositivFuturist]

When your entire worldview is based not on knowledge, but on what others think - the only possible rebuttal is a performance.

[6igantuar @6igantuar]

"Not all Sikhs are responsible for the behaviour of the bad Sikhs"

"You owe us reparations for slavery because some white people owned slaves"

[retvrn @kingcat1996]

@Tom_Rowsell @lancsdefender @Element_M1ller Shouldn’t be dealing with invaders to start with never mind selling them the tools to work

[Reeloy @Leroided]

how could this happen

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

Sure, here's some sources:

Sikhs vote overwhelmingly for left wing parties in Britain. The same is true in the US and Canada.

Even as support has fallen for Labour since 2023, it has increased among Greens and Lib Dems.

Sikh support has been conditional on a Sikh Manifesto pledge. In 2024, it included pledges to criminalise “anti-Sikh hate in a similar fashion to Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia”.

It was supported by the Sikh Federation UK — the same one that has released the statements condemning the Nowak family, that people have been praising.

The simultaneous Hindu manifesto, signed by Conservative politicians in 2024, contained commitments to criminalise "microaggressions" as “anti-Hindu hate (Hinduphobia)”, to make it easier for "Religious Workers" and the dependents and elderly parents of Hindus already in the UK to immigrate here, and more funding for Indian language and Hindu schools.

So, the parties have to cater to foreign religions, minority lobbies, and promise liberal immigration policies to win Sikh and Hindu support.

While it may not be the case for your friends, or Hardeep Singh, it is the case that many Sikhs and Hindus in Britain they prioritise whatever advantages their ethnic group over what benefits the British people.

I don't support that. Those who behave that way should leave. And I am happy to ban all immigration from India going forward.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

If I might explain why people aren't receptive to this message:

You're appealing for moral consideration to be extended to Sikhs because of your personal good relationships with Sikhs. Likewise, I've met some nice Sikhs. Nothing against those individuals.

However, many people will have seen the clannish behaviour of the Digwa family — common on the Indian Subcontinent, regardless of religion — and conclude there are irreconcilable cultural and ethnic differences there, which led to a young man's murder.

Others will have seen Indians celebrating Henry's death, just as they celebrated the Sikh trucker killing a family with an illegal U-turn on a Florida highway, when they thought that family was white.

They will have seen the special pleading and ethnic lobbying accompanying that celebration: people saying the trucker didn't mean it, it was a mistake, to preserve a system (H-1b visas) which privileges Indians.

The same with Digwa and Henry Nowak. People see the pleading not to blame Sikhs, but notice some Sikh representatives sticking by their own.

The Sikh Press Association that put out a statement from Digwa's family, to garner sympathy for them.

The Sikh representatives who said Digwa "didn't intend" to kill Nowak, which is something they couldn't possibly know, but are just saying to deflect blame from their "community" and preserve their status of legal privileges over natives in our country.

The Sikh politicians making everything about "the far right".

They will see a system which permits and encourages their clannishness, their ethnic chauvanism, but tells us don't look back in anger when our children are killed.

And yes, Sikhs may be a small population relative to Muslims and Hindus. But the majority of Sikhs would side against the British people if they decided to ban all immigration from India to halt and reverse demographic change. Because they would see it is a disadvantage to their ethnic and religious group.

Therefore, they are counted by many among the undifferentiated mass of migrants that are robbing us of a claim to our country.

This makes the question, "Who is Britain for?", a zero sum competition for possession of the country: between the natives, and minorities with a shared interest in preserving a system of laws which privileges them over us.

The individual good character of given Sikhs is beside the point. What people want is for that system of laws to be abolished; for ownership of Britain to be restored to us; for our fate as demographic minorities to be prevented.

And most people think, with good reason, based on the pattern above, that most Sikhs will side against the measures that restore that balance of power, to the British people away from the liberal minorities-first system.

And so any defence of a "community" codes as a commitment to preserving that system, even if that isn't your intention, Tommy.

[Vauban Books @VaubanBooks]

"Africans come to Europe in search of what their presence abolishes. They bring what they flee." - Renaud Camus

[Caitlin Johnstone @caitoz]

People like me take great pains to avoid coming across as antisemitic in our criticisms of Israel, and then Jewish Zionists go to these events all “Yes we Jews need to be actively manipulating western institutions in order to deceive everyone and control society.”

[Pat @KhunPat27]

Strange. I’ve spent years living in Thailand and somehow managed to avoid accusing Thais of racism for recognising that I’m not ethnically Thai. Why is Britain expected to abandon distinctions that the rest of the world understands perfectly well?

Where are the White Japanese?

[Auguste Prompt @augusteprompt]

All these people do is lie. They understand perfectly clearly about ancestral homelands when it applies to their kind but act baffled when it comes to our homeland.

These people must be removed from this country whether they like it or not.

[Alonso 🇪🇸 @alonso_dm]

Todos los hombres son violadores en potencia. Salvo los violadores de verdad, que son buenas personas en potencia.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

There is no original position where we are united with migrant communities imported against our wishes, who kill our children, conspire to cover it up, and cry "racism" to claim special privileges from the state to evade consequences.

We are divided whether we discuss it or not.