@timbhealey@mlbtraderumors My daughter’s softball team arrived an hour before the first game and played 5 games in 100 degree weather…poor Red Sox, can’t believe that happened to them.
@imelizabethlane@bennyjohnson@brandisiciliani I knew this guy was a sellout when he did a video of the hotel room they put him in during the campaign, just seemed odd to me…he isn’t about truth he is about that dough.
Have you watched videos of the event. Strange how unusually high number of maroon shirts were scattered throughout. @RealCandaceO mentioned this first and if you think she is crazy review for yourself.
What the Charlie Kirk assassination has made clear to me is that America’s new political divide isn’t left vs. right—it’s propagandists vs. the people.
Ask yourself: Which side would Charlie have stood with? The bullies or the bullied?
Whether it was COVID or any other issue, no one should be bullied into what to think or what to say. When people try to silence, shame, or intimidate others into agreement, it should be obvious which side they’re on—and which side you should stand with.
What the Charlie Kirk assassination has made clear to me is that America’s new political divide isn’t left vs. right—it’s propagandists vs. the people.
Ask yourself: Which side would Charlie have stood with? The bullies or the bullied?
Whether it was COVID or any other issue, no one should be bullied into what to think or what to say. When people try to silence, shame, or intimidate others into agreement, it should be obvious which side they’re on—and which side you should stand with.
What the Charlie Kirk assassination has made clear to me is that America’s new political divide isn’t left vs. right—it’s propagandists vs. the people.
Ask yourself: Which side would Charlie have stood with? The bullies or the bullied?
Whether it was COVID or any other issue, no one should be bullied into what to think or what to say. When people try to silence, shame, or intimidate others into agreement, it should be obvious which side they’re on—and which side you should stand with.
You phrase it that way, however, governance questions are fair. If the widow of an assassinated founder becomes CEO almost immediately, questions about succession, relationships, donor influence, board process, institutional continuity, and conflicts of interest are not personal attacks. They are basic governance questions.
That is especially true when the organization's founder was killed in public and the public narrative around his death was immediately politically valuable.
@tylerbowyer Can we start by seeing the unedited footage from behind Charlie? That could have been released a long time ago. How about getting some alibis for Brian Harpole? That would be a start
@benshapiro This is bonkers. CK stated to never stop asking questions and trust your gut, those defending the official narrative have a completely different view. “Listen to us, if not you’re retarded”. Come on people wake up
With the following, how TPUSA can be so certain should be concerning to anyone with a brain. How they can be so certain is beyond comprehension. Can people be this naive?
George Zinn decoy issue
Rear-camera footage withheld
SUV not impounded
Soil removal / paver emergency
“Heart/chest” shifting to “neck”
Hospital footage unavailable
30-06 / “Superman neck” problem
Bomb dogs / rifle recovery problem
Missing or mishandled physical evidence
Weak public Tyler Robinson proof
No ambulance despite alleged warning
Drone contradiction
Mikey McCoy instant phone call
Terrell/camera-guy death announcement
Rob McCoy succession-plan timing
No security plan for next-day Colorado event
Aspen CEO audio/video / AI concern
Fort Huachuca alibi inconsistencies
FOIA/alibi stonewalling
Tyler Robinson’s calm post-shooting movements
@BlakeSNeff I would have never thought Charlie’s own organization would be pushing a narrative rather than objectively reviewing all the evidence…but keep it up guys, nothing to see