KnowYoo

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@AbrFroman @Big_Deal15 @kevinblue345 You keep repeating the same statistic because it’s easier than defending the “conclusion” you’re trying to smuggle in.

A disparity is an observation. An explanation is proving race is the cause. You’ve done the first part about 20 times and the second part zero.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@AbrFroman @Big_Deal15 @kevinblue345 I know that was too much for you to digest. So in actuality I was posting it for those with slightly higher comprehension skills!

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@AbrFroman @Big_Deal15 @kevinblue345 Being so desperate for race to be the answer that you ignore every other variable is akin to drawing a conclusion on an answer before the teacher has given the question. That’s called emotional reasoning that’s draw from limited life experiences!

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@AbrFroman @Big_Deal15 @kevinblue345 “Poor whites vs wealthy Blacks” is a cherry picking. Adults compare large populations and account for income, neighborhood conditions, education, family structure, age, and exposure to violence.

Your article doesn’t say race causes crime. It argues that social conditions matter.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@AbrFroman @Big_Deal15 @kevinblue345 You’re confusing correlation with causation. Crime is closely linked to poverty, opportunity, age demographics, neighborhood conditions, and policing than race.

And if that’s arrest data, arrests aren’t convictions. Statistics without context describe outcomes not causes.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@SkyGodIV @NickMcmullin2 @radalderman @BreitbartNews You have selective eyeballs!!! He was slowing down (just like the officer) and they BOTH decide to continue moving forward but towards their left. Neither stops completely and both made judgements based on movement. And only one knew the possibility of the other being there!

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@2incite_insight @Nomad9223 @JAYNAST23526385 @dech81139 @masculineman77 Not true! The prosecution’s position was not that there was an illegal weapon (that is a losing argument because the knife was under the legal definition at 5.5 inches) and arguing school policy would be silly because many students are breaking some sort of school policy!

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@extralaxx @HeismanDev @4Cobey “You want him to lie under oath?”
The dumb: “Absolutely!”

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@HeismanDev @4Cobey What kind of born yesterday logic is that? The point is that he lied and therefore his testimony cannot be trusted. There was no need to lie. All he had to say was we WERE friends.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@JAYNAST23526385 @dech81139 @masculineman77 For clarity at HS meets, tents are private property. The bleachers they post them up over is public space. Therefore no team has legal authority of any space in the bleachers. The best you can argue is a first come first serve point or a common courtesy stance.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@Nomad9223 @JAYNAST23526385 @dech81139 @masculineman77 This was not part of the prosecutor’s arguments so it is best to believe that it may not be substantiated!

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@TorySmithbd @itzRex That jurys’ minds were made up as soon as they were selected to be on it!

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@thewickedestdj @HeirBalenciaga @mattvanswol @t_sadiity Yet the OP did not ask that. She asked if a white person was ever on TRIAL and HAD an all black jury. What say you? Because his response (not answer) was intentionally designed to deflect from the question.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@SayNoToTerror7 Genocide is not determined by a percentage of people killed. It is determined by intent to destroy a protected group. The scale of deaths can be evidence of that intent, but there is no fixed numerical threshold.

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@RockyMorales15 @BrianDarne77764 @sahouraxo Then that would make you the few and not the many he speaks of 🤔

[KnowYoo @Know2Yoo]

@Bgd323 @RealShahir @elonmusk An argument could be made that the mouse in the stable understands nationality better than you! 🧐