🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 Tulsi Gabbard allegedly received the Israel critical threat report 18 days ago, and resigned three days later.
Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar says the report was deliberately slow-rolled until Section 224 passed the House, giving Israel unprecedented access to U.S. intelligence and defense technology.
The U.S. just labeled Israel its most aggressive spy threat and handed them the keys to the vault the same week.
"You just robbed the bank. Want to be the bank manager?"
@AIPAC Who is this "White House official"?
Who is this "someone" that allegedly "doesn't have any knowledge of what's going on"?
When is (A)IPAC going register as an agent for a FOREIGN government? FARA!
Who is this "someone" that allegedly "doesn't have knowledge of what's going on"?
When is (A)IPAC going to register as an agent for a FOREIGN government?
It's not like Israeli agents haven't tried to spy on the Trump administration before.
Israel accused of planting mysterious spy devices near the White House.
https://t.co/q1rT1Y1Wm6
The red flags critics are pointing to: A few specific concerns are driving the criticism.
1- It trades visible oversight for an opaque process. Today, U.S. support for Israel runs largely through annual aid votes that Congress debates in public. Section 224 would shift much of the relationship into defense acquisition channels, where oversight is thin and public visibility is low. The result, critics say, is a relationship that is both deeper and harder to see.
2- It is very hard to reverse. Annelle Sheline of the Quincy Institute, a former State Department official, put it this way: once you build combined program offices and integrate networks, you cannot easily vote to end that the way you can vote to end an aid package. It becomes embedded in the bureaucracy. An aid package expires and gets renewed; institutional integration tends to be permanent.
3- Data fusion means sharing sensitive U.S. military data with a foreign government. Merging networks and fusing data raises real counterintelligence and technology-transfer questions, even with a close partner.
4- It deepens entanglement at a tense moment. The provision is advancing while the Trump administration weighs military action against Iran. Critics warn that tightly fusing U.S. and Israeli systems could pull Washington more directly into Israel’s conflicts, exactly as many Americans say they want less involvement in the region.
5- The process has been quiet. The provision was tucked into the chairman’s mark, the base text the committee chair writes to start markup, with little public debate for something this consequential.
6- The mismatch with alliance structure. Israel would receive integration deeper than treaty allies get, without the mutual obligations a treaty alliance carries.
Israeli PM Netanyahu Thanks US Congress For Passing HIS PLAN To Allow IDF To Takeover American Military & Intelligence Under Guise Of Weaning Off US Aid — Pentagon Raises Threat Of Israeli Spying
ʀᴇᴀᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴇᴘ ᴅɪᴠᴇ ʙᴇʟᴏᴡ
We have an "ally", Zionists, that accuses those that are critical of foreign policy with Israel as being "Israel haters" or "antisemites" or "Jew haters" as a way to manipulate to get what they want. They've been doing it for years. They view themselves as being above reproach.
Don't Invade Israel? Don't be a terrorist? Don't massacre Jews? The irony is overwhelming.
The original Middle East terrorists were Zionist Jews, i.e. Irgun, Stern Gang.
Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won.
https://t.co/50VcRebjYW
An excerpt:
"From the beginning of World War II through to the summer of 1947, there were virtually no Palestinian attacks, even though Zionist terror against Palestinians continued.
A British explanation for the Palestinians’ failure to respond in kind was that they understood that the attacks were a trap, intended to elicit a response that the Zionists would frame as an attack against which they would have to ‘defend’ themselves.
This was a Zionist tactic noted by the British as early as 1918, and it remains Israel’s default strategy today, most blatantly in Gaza, but also in East Jerusalem and the West Bank."
Israel targeting senior U.S. officials cannot be accepted by our government.
This is not standard practice, especially considering the fact that Israel survives on our defense funding & diplomatic top cover.
Until we actually take away the support we give Israel they will keep playing us as fools.
@EdwardTWinz "it took 30 years and a presidential pardon before Israel officially admitted Pollard was a state-run asset.. not a rogue.."
That is not correct. Israel admitted Pollard was it's agent in 1998.
https://t.co/FaGbMk4rOk
Jonathan Pollard was being ran, handled, by Rafi Eitan. Rafi Eitan posed as "Dr Joseph Ben Orr" to acquire the PROMIS software. Israel put backdoors into the software and Robert Maxwell went around trying to sell it to various governments. Robert Maxwell tried to sell it to Los Alamos Labs with the help of a former Senator from Texas John Tower, who was unaware of the backdoors in the software. Fortunately Robert Maxwell didn't succeed.
This is the type of crap the U.S. has been dealing with from the Israelis for a long time.
Documents Confirm DOJ Gave PROMIS Software to a Phantom Israeli Spy.
https://t.co/GaNQ2msDmJ
@DougAMacgregor Israel has been spying on the U.S. for years and getting away with it.
Fox News: Israeli Spy Ring Operating In America
https://t.co/mLq75hidxd
@infowakening@realdefender45 According to Pollard's handler Rafi Eitan, Ehud Barak - the director of IDF intelligence at the time - had a hand in Pollard's activities.
35 years later, new details on Pollard affair revealed.
https://t.co/bvuUJDPNVo
Jonathan Pollard was being ran, handled, by Rafi Eitan. Rafi Eitan posed as "Dr Joseph Ben Orr" to acquire the PROMIS software. Israel put backdoors into the software and Robert Maxwell went around trying to sell it to various governments. Robert Maxwell tried to sell it to Los Alamos Labs with the help of a former Senator from Texas John Tower, who was unaware of the backdoors in the software. Fortunately Robert Maxwell didn't succeed.
This is the type of crap the U.S. has been dealing with from the Israelis for a long time.
Documents Confirm DOJ Gave PROMIS Software to a Phantom Israeli Spy.
https://t.co/GaNQ2msDmJ
Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won.
https://t.co/50VcRebjYW
The original Middle East terrorists were Zionist Jews, i.e. Irgun, Stern Gang.
An except:
"From the beginning of World War II through to the summer of 1947, there were virtually no Palestinian attacks, even though Zionist terror against Palestinians continued.
A British explanation for the Palestinians’ failure to respond in kind was that they understood that the attacks were a trap, intended to elicit a response that the Zionists would frame as an attack against which they would have to ‘defend’ themselves.
This was a Zionist tactic noted by the British as early as 1918, and it remains Israel’s default strategy today, most blatantly in Gaza, but also in East Jerusalem and the West Bank."
Terrorism: How the Israeli state was won.
https://t.co/50VcRebjYW
The original Middle East terrorists were Zionist Jews, i.e. Irgun, Stern Gang.
An except:
"From the beginning of World War II through to the summer of 1947, there were virtually no Palestinian attacks, even though Zionist terror against Palestinians continued.
A British explanation for the Palestinians’ failure to respond in kind was that they understood that the attacks were a trap, intended to elicit a response that the Zionists would frame as an attack against which they would have to ‘defend’ themselves.
This was a Zionist tactic noted by the British as early as 1918, and it remains Israel’s default strategy today, most blatantly in Gaza, but also in East Jerusalem and the West Bank."