@Mrslhteach Yes to “big ‘if’”
Including RS in the “breadth” component alongside other hums is today’s untold other story of how RE in schools is being strengthened
⭐️ RE recommended to be included in the national curriculum
🪜 Francis and co recommend a 2-step process led by Dr Vanessa Ogden
👏 An incredible, landmark moment to reverse the fortunes of an important, but beleaguered, subject
@dakhalsa Lots of (problematic) assumptions here. Don’t assume that a Nat Curric subject ignores the local (eg History). Claims this means elimination of dharmic traditions unfounded.
Evidence in report says, sadly, “complex and fraying” local arrangements led to “tokenistic practice”.
Pre-reading for our curriculum Inset Day @astreaacademies tomorrow & love this quote - "Every teacher thinks that their subject is special. We know ours is". Also noting that 15 years into teaching, I'm still learning from @knowledgerich! Looking forward to a day of thinking RE.
Today, when these beauties arrived, I realised that this is the 70th booklet that #OpeningWorlds has written. Just 2 more to go & KS2 will be complete.
Nearly 300 primary schools around England now get children reading at least 800 words a lesson of this gorgeous stuff.
"In this book, you will learn both British & world stories, but ones which start in different places and often change lanes."
Weaving a history curriculum is hard. But with great history teachers & historians, it can be done.
Welcome to #ChangingHistoriesKS3 Year 8. Out in June.
@CPsPepTalk Very interesting article. But at the same time in-keeping with the kind of theological gymnastics that Charles has presented since his 1994 comments about being “the defender of faith”.
@sebastiandelfs Sorry to hear these things make you despair. They’re mere metaphors, or analogies. Elsewhere, I spoke about injecting wisdom, sensitivity & reflection into the world. & that wisdom, if Aquinas is right, may be analogous to the wisdom of God that is Christ crucified. Happy Easter!
📣New post!
👡Time for Cinde-RE-lla to go to ball?
🧩Religion today is complex. Intelligent RE prepares pupils to engage
🌍Curriculum diversity? RE is inherently diverse
💭RE injects wisdom, sensitivity & reflection into world asking BigQs: eg AI💻 & living well together🖖
🛐 Religious education has such an important role to play in helping young people to understand the world – but it will only fulfil its potential with clear national standards, says @knowledgerich
https://t.co/M3fw463tvl
@sebastiandelfs I advocate for RE grounded in disciplines: this gives pupils a warranted basis for the claims that they make, as well as helps them see traditions of knowledge construction about religion.
If this is what you’d characterise as “secular modern RBV”, so be it. ii/
@sebastiandelfs From what I’ve seen, RE is, on average, better in schools of a religious character, supported by curriculum time & valued by senior leadership.
However, in both school types I’ve seen poor RE in classrooms, with T&L unwarranted by scholarship, whatever one’s faith background i/
@sebastiandelfs Have given a more lengthy reply elsewhere, but, in short, “no!”
No reason why we can’t have both. It’s just that the current arrangements generate an unfortunate (and possibly unnecessary) trade-off.
The real point is that due to current legal arrangements, there’s a very unfortunate trade off.
Also, to my mind, it’s counter to the history and tradition of some schools of a religious character that were founded to improve education for all in the nation. 5/
Thanks for engaging, though there’s no need to speculate what I ‘really’ mean. As I’ve said elsewhere: whether or not RE should be included in the national curriculum is just part of the issue. 1/
I wish the educators pushing this would have the courage to say what they really mean. For schools such as mine, a non-Catholic, government-appointed ‘expert’ would be dictating the content of Catholic RE and inspecting it via Ofsted.
And, in such a two-sub-sector scenario, the Section 48 inspectorate (or equivalent appointed inspectorate in the case of academies) continues to inspect, not Ofsted 4/