@FShmacks@WehnerNick@paramounttactcl@baroncoleman The "answers" don't make any sense though. I have not seen enough to sentence a young man to death. If that was your son, would you be confident in the evidence so far?
@happyfeatz@JtShaggy@RealCandaceO Nobody! Don't speak reason to people in this case! ๐ They'd much rather sentence a young man to death then ever admit a widow may have had something to do with her husband's death.
@GenXND@KatyHuff_423@JtShaggy@RealCandaceO You mean degraded DNA and claims of a confession, but no real evidence of one? Ya, I dont tend to sentence a young man to death over evidence that isn't actually verified. But if you'd be willing to pull the trigger on TR over what you have seen then I pray youre never on a jury.
@BeyondSay69@ChrisKiss84@leahfiles Also, they state in the beginning her goal was to show that TR is a patsy and Andrew believes overwhelmingly that he did it. But Andrew had zero evidence to prove his case either.
@BeyondSay69@ChrisKiss84@leahfiles She came up with those alternatives when nothing about the official story makes sense. She doesn't claim to know exactly what happened. She has just blown enough grand canyon size holes in the narrative to believe something else happened.
@JeffRoseTV@LucyRiles@BlakeSNeff She states that based on the evidence presented. Which anyone with eyes and ears can blow massive holes in the evidence they have presented so far. Maybe she shouldn't have said 0%, but him saying 75-85% when he is there to debate his claim of OVERWHELMING evidence is laughable.
@CameronWealthh@BonkDaCarnivore Can you explain it from a Trump supporters position then? Because I can't for the life of me understand any other way of looking at it.
@Southside_bunny@receie23@Persway82 If the children are at THEIR FATHER'S HOUSE then the father gets to make the rules. Just cuz you blew the crotch gobbling out your cooler doesn't mean you get to control every single aspect of their life with their father also.
@jentothen19@IGraceAshford Sure! I bet it's a ton! But none of it promotes CK's murder or is related in any way to his name. She sales merch of her own name and brand.
@AhNah05063439@IGraceAshford Are you purposely ignoring the MILLIONS that TPUSA made in just a few short months after CK was murdered??? There are so many more moral ways they could have raised funds if they were so cash poor. Your comment just proves you don't care about truth.
@MattTheEskimo@JenX77X What "proof" did you see?? Because the whole world only saw a blurry video of a black mass running around a roof. That is the whole point of this debate. There is no "proof" of anything, only that there are a lot of things that dont make sense.
@JustJenRX No one has to prove Candace right or wrong. The state of UT has to prove TR actually committed the crime. It is crazy to me that so many are willing to sentence a young man to death over a couple blurry pics and a huge push from influences saying it was for sure him.
@RatturdT36582@LeftRight4029@LionelMedia It absolutely is the point. You can't sentence a young man to death because you think his car was on campus. This is a death penalty case. A young man's life is on the line. We already lost Charlie. Why kill another young man unless we know without a shadow of a doubt it was him.
@paleochristcon@tahini Those are a just a few reasons off the top of my head that make me think she is hiding something. Whether she was involved from the beginning I dont know. But if you can look at all of that and say she is just an innocent window, yoire willfully closing your eyes to the evidence.
@paleochristcon@tahini Refusing to look at any other suspect in a case that has very obvious holes and zero actual evidence tying TR to the shooting. Trying to state Charlie would believe and support things that he never stated publicly. Using her husband's death to promote the "event of the century".