@eugenius__ you dey bring in context but you no dey see how in the context of the match and everything that had happened, this thing had to reviewed ? was there not enough ??🌚🌚 French referees no mean sey they’re impartial. We saw what they gave as a foul in the build up
@eugenius__ Arg scoring is enough reason to review and clear it. You admit goal probably gets chalked off anywhere else on the pitch, so why was the ref afraid to review it? Arg stood to gain from that decision and everything to lose from the dual-decision.
@eugenius__ I’ve not seen any other angles yet, my opinion is based on the video up there. Thing is, even if the foul is soft ( would say if it’s against me), having two potential fouls not get reviewed in such a game is just poor officiating. You see how it can become a topic ?
@eugenius__ his foot collides? That’s what we’re calling it now ? Alvarez didn’t have control of the ball after winning it from salah. His next action was to kick him. Salah was between him and the ball after he intercepted it. It didn’t even warrant a review? 🤣
@leoforst10 Forster that’s the keeper. We all dey here, I go link you similar tackles one of these days. He intercepted the ball, didn’t have control, his next kick is the opponents leg but somehow e no be foul ? Is it a foul if his studs were up?
@leoforst10 did he kick him? it’s the same thing as when the defender gets contact with the ball but gets the man too. You winning the ball doesn’t mean you kick the man as well. It’s a foul when you catch your opponent, I lie ?