The physics community doesn’t talk about quantum immortality loudly because the logical conclusion of taking it seriously is almost unbearable to sit with.
Max Tegmark, one of the most respected cosmologists alive, once ran the numbers on the quantum suicide thought experiment and walked away shaken.
When you follow the Many Worlds Interpretation to its honest end, the math doesn’t just suggest survival.
It *demands* it.
You will always find yourself on the surviving branch. Only because the dead version of you produces no observer to experience being dead.
The real horror is what surviving everything actually looks like over a long enough timeline.
You don’t get to choose the branch you land in. You just land in the one where you’re still breathing, walking away from crashes that killed everyone else, outliving everyone you loved, the last man standing across infinite timelines.
And that’s only because the math left you no other option.
Now layer on what the CIA research actually points to and most people misread it.
The EEG spikes weren’t random noise.
They correlated with the emotional category of images that hadn’t appeared yet. Disturbing images triggered stress responses before they were shown.
Calm images produced nothing. The brain was accurately pre-responding to a future it hadn’t seen. Nobel Prize winner Anton Zeilinger’s entanglement experiments have since demonstrated that causation doesn’t have to flow one direction — the future can retroactively determine the state of the past.
Your nervous system evolved over 3.8 billion years purely to keep you alive. If retrocausality is real, natural selection would have ruthlessly favored organisms that could detect the shape of catastrophic futures.
The ones who couldn’t, died. The ones whose gut could faintly receive those signals, reproduced.
Your intuition might be evolutionary hardware built to pick up transmissions from timelines you never lived.
The question worth sitting with is:
what would change if you treated it like information instead of noise?
🚨 BREAKING: The Chief of Chicago Police is being praised nationwide for the moment he STOOD WITH ICE instead of the Left
"Let me make this CLEAR! Federal agents, ICE, HSI, are officers. They are agents of law enforcement."
"If you box them in...plow a VEHICLE, you're using DEADLY FORCE. And THEY can use deadly force in response to stop YOU!"
"We need to be clear about these laws. We cannot become a society where we just decide to take everything in our own hands and start to commit crimes against law enforcement!"
"It is a crime. You may not like what they're doing. I can understand that there's a lot of emotions out there, but that does NOT mean that you get to commit a crime, especially one that could lead to deadly force."
"We need to keep everyone safe. Our responsibilities when it comes to federal agents, and I've been asked these questions, we do not interfere with the duties and responsibilities of federal agents."
This is literally just common sense.
Every single police chief should be saying this. This is DEEP BLUE CHICAGO!
@UbisoftSupport@lahova24xx I have been getting this error for the last number of hours. This is complimentary with a loss and a full abandon penalty…Can we have a look here @UbisoftSupport
All actions of the Department of Government Efficiency will be posted online for maximum transparency.
Anytime the public thinks we are cutting something important or not cutting something wasteful, just let us know!
We will also have a leaderboard for most insanely dumb spending of your tax dollars. This will be both extremely tragic and extremely entertaining 🤣🤣
Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election. Far from being a threat to democracy, he is the only way to save it!
Let me explain: if even 1 in 20 illegals become citizens per year, something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible, that would be about 2 million new legal voters in 4 years.
The voting margin in the swing states is often less than 20 thousand votes. That means if the “Democratic” Party succeeds, there will be no more swing states!!
Moreover, the Biden/Harris administration has been flying “asylum seekers”, who are fast-tracked to citizenship, directly into swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Arizona. It is a surefire way to win every election.
America then becomes a one-party state and Democracy is over. The only “elections” will be the Democratic Party primaries. This already happened in California many years ago, following the 1986 amnesty.
The only thing holding California back from extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can leave California and still remain in America. Once the whole country is controlled by one party, there will be no escape.
Everywhere in America will be like the nightmare that is downtown San Francisco.
Iranian hackers sent STOLEN Trump campaign information to people associated with the Biden/Harris campaign.
This is exactly what Democrats said happened during the Russian “collusion” scandal.
But this time it’s real.
Where’s their outrage?
IN THE GLOBAL STRUGGLE AGAINST AUTHORITARIANISM, THE WEST’S REAL ENEMY IS ITSELF
American politicians speak constantly about the indispensable role of the United States in leading the free world against authoritarianism. If that is true, why is the White House so silent in the face of new global threats to free speech?
In January, American citizen Gonzalo Lira died in a Ukrainian prison for posting YouTube videos; the State Department didn’t lift a finger to help. Last week, Telegram founder Pavel Durov was arrested in France for the crime of insufficient content moderation.
Now Brazil has banned X for resisting the diktats of a tyrannical judge, who salivates over the possibility of jailing @elonmusk. The EU is one step behind, with Eurocrat Thierry Breton pursuing a criminal investigation against Elon for “platforming disinformation,” which Breton defines to include a conversation with Donald Trump.
In the UK, the government of Keir Starmer imprisons critics of open borders with more zeal than it prosecutes violent crime. In Canada, Justin Trudeau crushed a trucker protest against vaccine mandates by asserting sweeping new powers to freeze bank accounts.
At no point has the White House expressed concern about this new iron curtain that seems to be descending across the West. Quite the contrary, Mark Zuckerberg confirmed that the Biden-Harris administration repeatedly pressured Meta to censor during Covid. Worse, the FBI primed Facebook to censor true stories about Biden Family corruption by suggesting that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation (even though the FBI knew it was authentic).
Barring court intervention, TikTok will shut down in the U.S. on January 19, 2025 thanks to a new power authorized by Congress to ban websites and applications that the President determines are subject to the influence of a foreign adversary. X may not be far behind if liberal elites and deep state apparatchiks like Robert Reich and Alexander Vindman get their wish. They have called for the U.S. to adopt Brazil’s and the EU’s approach and “rein in” Elon Musk.
Hypocritically, the same voices demanding this crackdown are also the loudest in proclaiming the West to be engaged in a “war on authoritarianism” against countries like Russia and China. But whatever their other sins, Russia and China are in no position to deprive American citizens of their free speech rights; only our own government can do that.
Similarly, if Western leaders truly wanted to prevent authoritarianism, the easiest place to start would be at home, protecting the civil liberties of their own citizens. Instead they seem obsessed with deflecting the public’s attention onto foreign enemies, as Orwell depicted in the Two Minutes Hate in 1984.
As this battle over free speech heats up in an election year, where do the candidates stand? Donald Trump has declared his support for free speech whereas Kamala Harris has said nothing and can be expected to continue her administration’s policy of tacit approval of creeping censorship. In just two months, Americans will decide. Do we actually lead the free world in standing up for free speech, or do we accept the authoritarianism we claim to detest so much?
We NEED To Elect Donald Trump So RFK Jr. Can Stop This
Chick-fil-A, Just 2 Food Items, Contain Over 265 Ingredients 🤯
“No two foods should contain that many ingredients”
Food Contains “Anti-foaming agent from silicone”
“This is why I never eat a Chick-fil-A. I ordered a spicy chicken deluxe and a small mac and cheese. There's really not much to this. Combined with both of these food items, they contain over 265 ingredients. No two foods should contain that many ingredients.”
What are the ingredients in here I've never even heard of? It's called dimethypolysiloxane. This is a food additive that is used as an anti-foaming agent from silicone. It's also found in industrial lubrication and cosmetics.
There's also dough conditioners here, obviously in the bun, like datum and mono-diglycerides, which come through oil processing using soy oil, hydrogenated oil, which are trans fats. These, of course, are all pro-inflammatory agents. This is not gonna sit well on your digestive system.”
Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things:
1. Biden-Harris Admin "pressured" Facebook to censor Americans.
2. Facebook censored Americans.
3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Big win for free speech.