Which agreement is Ursula von der Leyen so eager to welcome?
She appears to have conveniently forgotten that this very agreement was born out of an aggressive war waged by the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran.
It was a war that violated the most fundamental principles of international law. And yet, von der Leyen has never once condemned it.
Her words carry less the weight of a European Commission president than the echoes of a representative from Germany. It seems that von der Leyen is simply repackaging the same failed policies toward Iran that her fellow German Chancellor has long championed, now rebranded as EU strategy. These are the very policies that culminated in Germany’s unsurpried defeat in the recent UN Security Council elections.
Can the members of the European Union truly be so disconnected from reality as to endorse @vonderLeyen’s irrelevant rhetoric? We seriously doubt it.
Israel continues to destroy civilian infrastructure as shown in this video, which captures the Israeli army destroying solar panels in southern Lebanon.
Amnesty International has previously documented extensive destruction by the Israeli military along Lebanon’s border before and after the November 2024 ceasefire. We called for reparations and the investigation into this for war crimes. So far, neither has appeared.
Since the more recent 2026 “ceasefire”, civilians in southern Lebanon’s border villages, many of whom are displaced, are continuing to witness their homes, land and infrastructure destroyed.
Israel must stop the unlawful destruction of civilian property across southern Lebanon.
🚨BREAKING: Anthropic just published a study mapping exactly which jobs its own AI is replacing right now.
The workers most at risk are not who anyone expected. They are older. They are more educated. They earn 47% more than average. And they are nearly four times more likely to hold a graduate degree than the workers AI is not touching.
The argument is straightforward. Anthropic built a new metric called "observed exposure." Not what AI could theoretically do. What it is actually doing right now in professional settings, measured against millions of real Claude conversations from enterprise users.
For computer and math workers, AI is theoretically capable of handling 94% of their tasks. It is currently handling 33% of them. For office and administrative roles, theoretical capability is 90%. Current observed usage is 40%. The gap between what AI can do and what it is already doing is enormous. The researchers are explicit about what comes next. As capabilities improve and adoption deepens, the red area grows to fill the blue.
The demographic finding is what makes the paper uncomfortable. The most AI-exposed workers earn 47% more on average than the least exposed group. They are more likely to be female. They are more likely to be college educated. This is not a story about warehouse workers or truck drivers. It is a story about lawyers, financial analysts, market researchers, and software developers. The exact group whose education was supposed to insulate them.
Computer programmers showed the highest observed AI exposure at 74.5%. Customer service representatives at 70.1%. Data entry keyers at 67.1%. Medical record specialists at 66.7%. Market research analysts and marketing specialists at 64.8%. These are not predictions. These are measurements of work that is already happening on AI platforms right now.
Then there is the pipeline finding nobody is talking about loudly enough.
Anthropic's researchers found a 14% decline in the job-finding rate for workers aged 22 to 25 in highly exposed occupations since ChatGPT launched. No comparable effect for workers over 25. Entry-level roles were never just jobs. They were the training ground where junior analysts became senior analysts, where junior lawyers learned how arguments hold together. If that layer disappears, nobody has answered the question of where the next generation of senior professionals comes from.
The detail buried in the paper that most coverage missed: 30% of American workers have zero AI exposure at all. Cooks. Mechanics. Bartenders. Dishwashers. The technology reshaping professional careers is completely irrelevant to roughly a third of the workforce. The divide is no longer between high skill and low skill. It is between presence and absence.
The company publishing this study is the same company selling the AI doing the replacing. Anthropic had every commercial incentive to soften these findings. They published them anyway.
If you spent four years and $200,000 on a degree to land a white collar career, the company that builds Claude just confirmed your job is more exposed than the bartender pouring drinks at your graduation party.
Source: Anthropic, "Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence"
PDF: https://t.co/taYgsIfiTj
You've probably heard the story of the Three Wise Men who traveled to Bethlehem to honor the newborn Jesus (PBUH), but did you know that they established a church in Iran upon their return?
This is it: St. Mary Church in Urmia, Iran, built in the 1st century AD.
Slovenija nema Rafale, nema čak nikakvu ratnu avijaciju ali eto usudi se priznati palestinsku državu. Hrvatska ima sve ali se ne usudi ništa.
Izgleda da se snaga države ipak ne mjeri snagom njezinog oružja.
#palominapamet
The best way to start a #FIFAWorldCup matchday? 🌅
The biggest fan banner - over 2⃣0⃣0⃣ metres long! - and a song! 🎶 #Family ❤️🔥 #Vatreni
🟥⬜️🟥⬜️🟥⬜️🟥⬜️🟥⬜️
⬜️🟥⬜️🟥⬜️🟥⬜️🟥⬜️🟥
#Qatar2022