@antidicatorship@bensmithrugby I get the sense there's a cosy inner circle between NZ Rugby and the media. Rugby in NZ is struggling and this feels like a scramble to stay relevant. People are starting to see through it. The internet has made the world smaller, and there's nowhere left to hide.
@bensmithrugby I get the sense there's a cosy inner circle between NZ Rugby and the media. Rugby in NZ is struggling and this feels like a scramble to stay relevant. People are starting to see through it. The internet has made the world smaller, and there's nowhere left to hide.
@Rugby_Scoop@WorldRugby I get the sense there's a cosy inner circle between NZ Rugby and the media. Rugby in NZ is struggling and this feels like a scramble to stay relevant. People are starting to see through it. The internet has made the world smaller, and there's nowhere left to hide.
Marvel Rivals Optimization
go to:
%USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\Marvel\Saved\Config\Windows
Make file Engine.ini and paste in:
https://t.co/xPiY3iwd3i
Make three different files named:
- DefaultInput.ini
- Input.ini
- EnhancedInput.ini
https://t.co/gM3bgyRvQl
paste in all 3
💯📚 Damage Stacking Infographic has been updated for Episode 2: Revenant!
Imgur: https://t.co/51IEspvJrn
High-quality version found in next tweet.
#Destiny2#Destiny2art#Destiny2AOTW
🧵
Afraid of an SGE release impact on your traffic? I’ve created an SGE traffic risk assessment checklist sheet to help you identify the potential risk for your own top customer journey queries 👀 Check it out 👇 https://t.co/Lc6FIZyNau
Prompt Engineering is all you need to get the best of GPT-4 and Llama-2
A new study introduces 26 prompting principles that can boost the LLM's response by staggering 50% 😱
This study cover aspects like Prompt Structure and Clarity, Specificity and Information, and Complex Tasks and Coding Prompts.
My Favorite AI prompt to help you improve your SEO rankings.
First off, this prompt works on Bard, it doesn’t work on ChatGPT.
Whenever you are trying to rank on Google you’ll notice that in many cases a website may rank higher than yours even if you believe your content is better.
What you need to keep in mind is Google doesn’t actually understand content quality. They fake it.
As Google admitted to the DOJ, “We do not understand documents, we fake it.”
So I like asking Bard to help determine what I can improve in my content to rank better.
First, ask Bard this question:
Can you tell me the main differences between the content on this page [insert URL of a competitor page that ranks above you] and this page [insert URL of another competitor page that ranks above you] ?
This prompt will tell you the differences in the content for those 2 different web pages.
Make sure the URLs you select rank for the same keyword on Google. Don’t use those sites' homepage URLs, you have to use the exact URL that is ranking on Google for that particular keyword.
Bard will then tell you the difference in the content and give you ideas.
Then I want you to use the following prompt on Bard to get even more insights:
Can you tell me the main differences between the content on this page [insert URL of a competitor page that ranks above you] and this page [insert URL of another competitor page that ranks above you] ? And then after analyzing both of those pages, can you tell me how to make the content on my page better on my web page? Here is the URL for my web page [insert URL of the page on your site that is targeting the same keyword]
This will give you more insights on what you need to change to rank higher.
The reason I break it down into 2 prompts versus 1 is because if you just used the 2nd prompt, Bard won’t give you enough feedback on the content quality for the URLs ranking above you on Google.
This SGE study by @Authoritas_com shows there is likely to be significant disruption when it goes fully live.
▪️ 87% of keywords triggered SGE
▪️ 94% of the time, the links in SGE were from domains that don't currently rank in the top organic results
I keep re-reading that last bit. Wondering if I misinterpreted it?
Here's the article:
https://t.co/sNshCtOlID
Here's my summary and brief notes:
https://t.co/2JZX5pkjZQ
oh wow. I think this GPT works.
Export data from GSC comparing keyword rankings before and after an update and upload it to ChatGPT and it will spit out this scatter plot for you.
It's an easy way to see if most of your keyword declined or improved.
This site was impacted by the October core update.
Give it a try! If you click the "how do I use this" button you'll get instructions.
https://t.co/NdRN40sICG
I've talked to many of you who are miserable in your jobs.
You need to build leverage. It doesn't happen overnight but start as soon as you can.
Some people build a project on the side. I built an audience.
Here is my advice in 3 parts. This is what I did and what worked for me. My advice differs from what many others will tell you:
First, be willing to do what nobody else is doing.
I started writing about machine learning in 2020. Every person I found talked about research papers using words I couldn't pronounce. I did something different. I started writing about mundane topics using simple words. No math, no fancy language. I spoke to people like me who didn't work for a research lab.
It worked.
One day, AI became cool. The crypto influencers changed their focus and flooded the internet with content. They did the bare minimum to attract attention: they wrote about tools, links, and courses. They focused on the "what" but never told you the "why."
Good creators went one step further and made their content 10x better by telling you the "why" of things. This is much harder to do.
But you have to be willing to do what nobody else is doing.
I started talking about the "what" and the "why," but I didn't stop there. I started talking about the "how" as well. This is the secret that kept people coming back to my content.
Second, you have to put in the work. You have to be consistent, but I don't agree with one of the most popular recommendations I've seen online.
People tell you that quantity is better than quality. This is some attempt to please the algorithm, but I only care about pleasing people.
If your writing is bad, you'll end up with the wrong audience.
Of course, you need repetitions but don't write because you have to check an imaginary box. Write with intention and purpose. Write to become better.
Instead of writing more, start editing more. I use @typefully to write everything I post on X and LinkedIn. They are the gold standard, and I've been using their app for years:
https://t.co/GszPRWYHzr
Don't post the same day you write. Instead, schedule your content for a week later and review it the day before.
This is a big deal. By waiting a week before you post and looking at it again, the quality of your content will improve. A lot!
My third piece of advice is to watch your analytics and use them to guide you.
Peter Drucker said, "You can't manage what you can't measure." @typefully gives me a lot of numbers. I focus on Top Posts, Engagement During the Day, Impressions, and Profile Clicks. You'll see some of them in the attached screenshot.
It's simple: I look for what works to do more of it and move away from what doesn't.
I made this sound simple, but I know it isn't. If building an audience was a piece of cake, everyone would do it.
I believe, however, that everyone should try.
It will give you leverage.