Why are we living? What is the purpose? What comes after this life? Why does anything exist at all? There are no universally accepted scientific answers to these questions.
The most common material explanation can feel emotionally unsettling: that life is simply a temporary biological process. One day it ends, consciousness disappears, and you cease to exist. Not only do you die, but your awareness itself vanishes. You won't even know that you no longer exist because the very thing that experiences, remembers, and feels would be gone.
For many people, that thought creates an existential vacuum. Belief in God fills that vacuum with meaning. Life becomes a journey rather than a random event. Suffering can have purpose. Death becomes a transition rather than absolute erasure. Instead of "I exist briefly and then disappear forever," it becomes "I am here for a reason and my existence has meaning beyond the physical."
Whether God exists or not is a separate debate, nor am I urging anyone to believe in God, but psychologically it is understandable why faith can make people happier. It offers answers where uncertainty can feel frightening, and certainty itself gives the mind rest.
Your advertisements are so effin irritating @SonyLIV. Never had such an experience while watching matches. Every 20 seconds you are playing 3 stupid ads! What is wrong with you? #indvspak2025
We sat down with @ishmohit1 (@soicfinance) to decode the $45B GLP-1 revolution, why people on these drugs hate food, how Novo bought a bottleneck, and what India should watch.
This thread unpacks everything, from the physiology to the supply chain to the investment plays 🧵
Sir Demis Hassabis is the most dangerous CEO alive:
• Chess prodigy at age 4
• Knighted in 2023 for services to AI
• Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2024
He now leads Google's DeepMind AI
His vision of the next 10 years will terrify you 🧵
Also he looked at this pitch and played two spinners. Just for batting depth. Despite Bumrah and Siraj already being cooked with the workload. Braindead stuff. Rookie coaches in club cricket would do better.
Almost feel bad for Rohit Sharma. Sad to see it end this way. But he just called it upon himself by taking the decision to drop GIll, remove KL from where he was thriving and take that position for himself. Even the ardent Rohit fan can't debate that was not for the team in any way, and just a selfish move. Something that tbh seemed illogical too, if your form is off how'd you do better against a new ball fresh attack than coming on later to used ball and tired bowlers. The risk to reward ration didn't even make sense.
Still sad to see it end like this for him.