Keith

An advocate for rationality and clear thinking.

#endbsl

[Keith @krozu]

@EnjoyerMoirai @woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @cremieuxrecueil because a tiny minority seriously attack.

[Keith @krozu]

@EnjoyerMoirai @woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @cremieuxrecueil completely eliminate dog fighting rings. Once fighting aggression is no longer selected for the trait will rapidly disappear. If you're for banning dog fighting then I'll back you 100%, but I'll never ever, ever EVER support banning all pit type dogs...

[Keith @krozu]

@EnjoyerMoirai @woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @cremieuxrecueil environmental experiences behave identically, so why would you think that dogs with different genes AND radically different environmental experiences would act the same?

[Keith @krozu]

@EnjoyerMoirai @woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @cremieuxrecueil each individual's behavior. Each individual has different genes and environmental experiences which work together to create large differences in behavioral outcomes.

Not even cloned dogs 👇 with the same DNA and similar...
https://t.co/HM7AeR6a5D

[Keith @krozu]

@woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @EnjoyerMoirai @cremieuxrecueil In summery: stereotyping individuals whether they are men or pit bulls is irrational. Judge individuals by their actions, not by the group they happen to belong to.

I agree with you about pit bulls.

[Keith @krozu]

@woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @EnjoyerMoirai @cremieuxrecueil pleading fallacy 👇 The fact is that these criteria are irrational nonsense that ought to be thrown out by any clear thinking person.

[Keith @krozu]

@woscasfrench @Ban_Men_Now @EnjoyerMoirai @cremieuxrecueil commit violent acts. Saying that the stats and stories X, Y and Z "prove" that all/most pit bulls are dangerous, but that the same criteria doesn't "prove" that all/most men are dangerous hypocritically commits the logical error known as the special...

[Keith @krozu]

@RealPeterTeal @webdevMason Since men commit the overwhelming majority of violent crimes do you think that all men men are dangerous and pose a risk to children? Why or why not?

[Keith @krozu]

@LobsterTimes @Ban_Men_Now @AnimalLeague

[Keith @krozu]

@LobsterTimes @Ban_Men_Now @AnimalLeague Given those male stats and the fact that 91.4% of serial killers are men, do you think that there's any significant difference between Fred Rogers, who taught kids to love their neighbors, and Ted Bundy, who murdered 30+ women? Why or why not?

[Keith @krozu]

@EHDIII1 @Ban_Men_Now @ZombywoofZ @Rainmaker1973 @ZombywoofZ, got a taste of his own medicine today. Hopefully his eyes were opened and he learned something.

[Keith @krozu]

@TotalHorse1152 @NotMaryAnnObv @cremieuxrecueil Of course, those criteria fail to prove that either all men or all pit bulls are dangerous monsters, as they commit the fallacy of composition and the hasty generalization fallacy 👇, as only a tiny minority of each population is violent.

[Keith @krozu]

@TotalHorse1152 @NotMaryAnnObv @cremieuxrecueil If you're saying that those criteria don't prove that all men are dangerous monsters, but do prove it in the case of pit bulls you'd be irrationally committing the special pleading fallacy 👇

[Keith @krozu]

@TotalHorse1152 @NotMaryAnnObv @cremieuxrecueil Men actually do commit the vast majority of violent crimes. That's a fact. See Grok's response 👇