In my closing remarks, I returned to this theme of education: “I have found that the looming presence of AI makes the old mental disciplines of the liberal arts vastly more necessary, not less. It makes their value more apparent to students as well.”
Of interest perhaps to @JamesWHankins1, @RalstonCollege, @stephenblackwd, @alexpriou, @uaustinorg
https://t.co/l70ciJDOhm
Fantastic essay by @AbigailShrier
Maintaining constant optionality — with relationships, jobs, cities — is its own choice, and it isn’t a satisfying one.
How I came to see the “Great Feminization” as the most significant event of our century—and a potential threat to civilization. https://t.co/6R9wwGvUVh
@uaustinorg “To the class of 2029: you have chosen to rebel. Not against hierarchy, but against its abandonment. Not against standards, but against their erosion. Not against excellence, but against those who would fake it.”
@UATX
"I have given up newspapers in exchange for Tacitus and Thucidydes, for Newton and Euclid, and I find myself much the happier." -Jefferson writing to Adams
Plato's Republic is largely, though not exclusively, a conversation between Socrates, Glaucon, and Adeimantus. Glaucon and Adeimantus were brothers (of Plato). I always found it remarkable and instructive that this foundational cornerstone of Western philosophy is basically a couple of brothers talking to a philosopher. Why? Because it reminds you that you can run through almost the whole breadth of the human situation in an intelligent conversation with a handful of people, provided they embody a type or paradigmatic way of looking at things, which many do.
Winning is not enough. People can get lucky and win. People can be assholes and win. Anyone can win. But not everyone is the best possible version of themselves.