Kunal Swami

Generative AI, Computer Vision at Samsung Research India Bangalore @samsungresearch, Past @iiscbangalore
#generativeAI, #computervision, #imageprocessing

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

Thrilled to share that our paper, "Insert In Style (IIS)", has been accepted to ACM Multimedia (ACMMM) 2026! IIS is a novel framework and training paradigm designed for localized, style-aware object composition. Read our paper here: https://t.co/kZkrle6J4k

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@4n5hh_ @HaiyuWu1 @lucyjcai Can you please elaborate why no?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@sjtuytc @CSProfKGD Curious how it turned out that way. Were there some Borderline Accept reviewers who had genuine concerns?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@aluyui @CVPR Definitely good in the sense that reviewers updated their final rating post rebuttal 😉

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@CVPR Does not pariticipating in discussion and/or not updating final review (rating and justification) within deadline come under irresponsible reviewing?
1. I have this case for 1 paper in my review stack of 4.
2. For my own paper, only 1/3 reviewer has udpate the review.

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@csgaobb But I wish he had done it earlier and before the deadline, there are points worth discussing and scope to build some consensus.

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@csgaobb Same scenario in 1/4 paper I am reviewing. Fortunately, couple of hours back, 1 reviewer referred to my posted discussion and has submitted a properly justified final rating.

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@CSProfKGD In 1/4 paper I am reviewing, 1 reviewer has not submitted the final rating & justification yet (neither participated in discussion).
Also, for my own paper, only 1/3 reviewer has updated the review post rebuttal.
What happens in such cases? Everything on AC?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@aluyui @CVPR You can see the "modified date & time" for each review. For my paper, only one review was modified two days back, other two reviews have same timestamp as before the rebuttal (or official review release timestamp).

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@petersamahaa @iamwaynechi Sorry, what is an industrial PhD?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@SattlerTorsten @PaulGavrikov @eccvconf Sorry if it's well known, but why ECCV unlike CVPR, ICCV does not publish in IEEE?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@SattlerTorsten @CVPR I also faced this problem 😕 and I just uploaded my paper PDF here in a hurry.

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

Glad to know that I am recognized as @CVPR 2025 Outstanding Reviewer! Reviewing papers not only helps develop critical thinking but it is extremely satisfying to know that my service to the community is recognized as outstanding :)!

[#CVPR2026 @CVPR]

Behind every great conference is a team of dedicated reviewers. Congratulations to this year’s #CVPR2025 Outstanding Reviewers!

https://t.co/z8w4YJKTep

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@CVPR Glad to see my name! Will there be an email? Last time when I got this in CVPR 2023, it was announced via email, that was really encouraging :)!

[Denny Zhou @denny_zhou]

The bitter lesson Yann learned from Llama 4

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@CSProfKGD My R2 made this comment in the justification, "the paper is not reaching the standard of innovation at @CVPR. It's better to re-submit it to other venues". 🤔

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@jon_barron @thiemoall Revealing names during the discussion can lead to authority bias?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@CSProfKGD R1, R2, R3, all in my case 🥲

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@rohan99pandey @danish037 @NirantK @unironictechbro 2. "Best-selling author": Has 3 reviews on Amazon, & a simple Google search does not back this claim. Is this click-bait or clear scam?

[Kunal Swami @kunalswami189]

@rohan99pandey @danish037 @NirantK 1/n I think it is important to call out such misinformation & BS as it is done by @unironictechbro, instead of calling it as "click-bait"!
Fine, the guy has made contributions, totally respect that, but the claims are BS and scammy:
1. "Endorsed by Dr. Andrew Ng"