The Black Squirrel of Luton

Deputy Undersecretary of Memes and Witticisms of The Republic of South Africa
Rogue Bovine Software Engineer
Gemini Ascendant Virgo in a Capricorn Moon

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

@JordiGriff And you still look like a twat in that tank top.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

@JordiGriff Don't lecture the people who complied reluctantly with the bad laws demanding that everyone comply with the good ones.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

@EmmiieTLO Go for it. I tip very well too.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Are they attempting through litigation to obstruct the enforcement of the law? This is certainly a Democracy, however if what this fellow says is true and there are indeed attempts through means other than free expression to continue illegal immigration from your tribe as this man says, that issue is somewhat important to me also and I might think your tribe are trying to destabilize this society and exploit our values.

Be that the case and the effort obvious of being active and duplicitous, no; my tribe is not from the jungle and that is not what will fill the void of reconsidering Democracy, if you are attempting double-dealing underhanded sedition.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

No, I keep assuming bad intention from you because you rolled up into my feed and started grading it and my effort somewhat passive-aggressively, misused the world empirical in a context not empirical because I don't think you know what that word means, but also in the same sentence said that it had proven as fact a definition that contains no facts nor sets up any conditions for testing them empirically.

And now you're saying I'm projecting my emotions onto you when just two comments ago you tried to imply I was too proud and insecure to admit it when I make a mistake, and where exactly did you think it was going to land to say I asked you for your opinion on the substance of what I write that I didn't ask you to?

And I am also rather indifferent to the circumstances that have made you a "racist," but rather your tip-toeing and side-stepping at repeatedly laboring the point home of what you perceive at any moment are my feelings and emotions.

So you're the judge of my quality, the overseer of my emotional state, you said my writing has no substance and is emotional, but I'm imaging your having been patronizing, and you did just volunteer to me that you're a racist after which you said I was projecting my emotions?

My brother in Christ; I believe you are in quite rather dire need of some therapy because the voices in your head are many and they have had a great deal of things to say to me and none of them have been about me or for my benefit. Good luck with that.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

@Zeke_Yeagerist @AxolileNotywala Oh! Have you been attempting to patronize me repeatedly because you didn't notice my handle is German and you are a "racist." That's amazing. Top shelf, man. I might even be impressed. I think you're even good at it too.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

I may have been awake for a bit longer than I care to admit and am not seeing the contradiction because there is a fault in my logic, and also my amygdala is misfiring and has also shit that whining like a sensitive little bitch bed too.

But your attempts at patronizing me repeatedly aren't winning you over to me, so take the mea culpa of your contradiction bone on faith and enjoy chewing it; but cut the other stuff out.

I've never actually attempted to quantify what volume emotional my essays are as opposed to... whatever it be on the other side in opposition to emotional. I also don't think I asked you to either for report card and a value function.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

And I look forward to your remaining dissatisfied by reading them, and gleaning no subjective substance from them, and conjuring contradictions by having confused yourself, for not having read Wittgenstein or even merely the cautionary foreword of making oneself a manic obsessive playing word games of infinite resolution and abstraction, and steering into the contradictions as though they be oncoming traffic; and the honor of being such a formative influence on your existence as the object of your nihilist fangirl Stockholm Syndrome.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Owe, excuse me; you questioned my effort to point out a logical fallacy that was not available in the terms of your original question but that I had wasted effort before you have created it, but you weren't taking a dig, it was constructive criticism.

The definition that you gave me that is the "formal definition" of what I had understood by being an intentionally vague non-definition defining itself by being concise as vague.

You appear to have misunderstood me when I had said it is not a word because seeking to apply it as defined renders the definition useless without additional information not present in the definition.

There are no traits that are commonly shared upon which to anchor the thousands of groups on many metrics that form the "African diaspora" thus it achieves nothing by the "empirical definition" for either the existing or the invoking, or even what confers that status of member of the African Diaspora, or how long and what constituents descent.

A priori let us assume that at least one person of every ethnic may perhaps even have been by broadest stretch also covered by the definition for having been born while on an airplane flying over Africa; are they of the African diaspora and for how long be it required that one remain to qualify?

Allow me to reiterate - a word vaguely defined enough that when interrogated says nothing with defined the information as presented is thus - as intended by my statement - not a real word - and using a word that that achieve having said nothing but that may be refined later with new information is not a word, it is an ideological weapon.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Oh. No. I wrote all that to answer your question in good faith because I assumed you had asked it in good faith, but I did also have fun doing it.The answer you were looking for in the correct domain was the intended "is not a word with a formally recognized definition that shall remain so as being intentionally vague retains its use as an ideological weapon."

You seek a lesson not in words but in the origin of symbols in the philosophy of Wittgenstein, found there in the logical and not the phenomenology of applied symbols more abstract found in Ferdinand Saussure, not avoiding a reply to your logic statement, and I wrote what preceded this to leave little doubt on the table when I tell you that your gotcha has tickled me less than a tick I flicked off my testicles and for the bad faith attempt invite you to instead kindly go f*ck yourself.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

What does any of this have to do with anything and why are you being into drawn out arguments defending your integrity by "what ifs" and "stand in the naughty corner"?

Because the librarians at the equality library have many letters proclaim they are very good librarians. And even a bit framed one or several very expensive pieces of bumpy cardboard with wax on then written in Latin, made to look like the scrolls in a monastery in the big, shouting, serious German typeface chosen by Charlamagne.

Also then, custodians and librarians of a library when monks did that too and started Universities from them in Heidelberg and open the door to allow people to read their books. You are under no obligation to receive a lecture on morality or your rights if you don't want to or recognizing the authority of the librarians at the very big, fancy library so big that these people only look after one wing of it where the equalness books are.

Cool story; I don't really know a whole lot about equalness so I am in no position to speak on the quandaries on how it is measured or determined because it is boring to me and frankly if we are being completely honest and crude these people have chosen to dedicate their entire lives to being the people who standardize the rulers that shall be used in the many techniques for measuring dicks in a dick measuring contest, but also account for girth, shape, pleasantness to look at, angle of azimuth of the flop, and overall contribution when viewed holistically with the rest of the form that having been measured adds or subtracts from the whole. They cannot in fact say they are specialists in assessing equalness between people if they do not when assessing it conduct a dick measuring contest.

To the matter at hand though: The law is the law, the law has not changed, there's another document with 14 other laws in it that say they are the laws that are for the benefit of you being subject to and beneficiary of that peace of mind, you have every right to demand that the law be enforced as you see it when it is not, because it is actually written down that you can demand it even putting a time limit on it which it says you can do too as another right, and the lovely thing about laws is that if something bad happens enforcing them you can say, "Gosh, how terrible; why didn't the people who wrote them think harder about if this might happen when it was their job to do that creating the law?" and what happens is not your fault.

You do not need to justify your rights even to the bestest most, awesomest most, incredible librarians at the one at the Vatican that still has monks in it doing the librarian things in what I am quite sure is a very-vast and impress equalness wing and before the white smoke blows over the square on San Pietro it is the gold-plated mirror-shiny on a silk pillow reduction compass from the hand of Leonardo Di Vinci used for the dick-measuring that be done when selecting a Pope also for maximal equalness, you don't have to justify your rights to them either.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Excuse me; I'm a "white" and I dislike those people too and I'm standing next to you pissing into their tent with you cause I don't like how they're doing you dirty and making a liar of me for saying I meant those promises in that document of laws we said were yours and intended to keep. You are speaking out for your rights as they are written and that I think are real, and I haven't heard them give me a reason why not, so I'm going to keep standing here next to you looking over at them until they do.

I have not heard any convincing reason or attempt at making one that would not make of me a liar either by joining the naughty word sermon or saying nothing and would then have to stand before my God when called to account and say that when it came down to it that my word meant nothing, the promises weren't real, and when I saw them being broken bearing my name because it may cause an international incident, shortage of Sixty60 drivers or because nobody wants to hold the back of being near the consequences, or the wish no part of having the violence if it potentially occur splash up on them if a dead illegal be splashed up on the cover of the NYT for that being the sum value of a price too high to risk having to pay and their integrity or convictions.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Etymology, being the individual pieces of a word comprise of a root, and prefix and suffix modifiers that act upon the proper originating proto-languages have been primitive and simple for their culture that were also that.

This new made of word that some want to make stick is comprised of the the proper prefix and root Afro, which was the Roman word for their mortal enemies the Carthaginians in Tunisia, who got the name of being the Afri tribe because as used by them was narrowly to mean "The Tribe who live in Caves" because they were and they did living in a desert with cool caves lying around, but that is itself also derived from the Egyptian word Afrat and meant to the Egyptians two things - a wide cavern or opening that something passes through, like a grotto, or a cave, or a cavern, or some kind of opening; or, as is meant in the case, a vagina or pussy which is all of those things and the Egyptians meant to say that it was the motherland and soil of the world, but when literally translated exactly as written as a verb, concisely defined as "to turn ones head and look up into the vagina of the world so far you can see the womb of it, and that is what you are looking at."

This new word combines that with the suffix -phobia that means fear, but in this context describes and sick and hateful person overcome by fear that a driven mad an murderous.

Thus this new word when all told combined in its rawest and most direct meaning from the beginning if taken literally mean: "To turn ones head and look up into the vagina of the world so far you can see the womb of it, and that is what you are looking at, and become overcome by fear that a drives you mad and murderous and turn into a sick and hateful person."

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Yeah, but then also though when the Afrikaners do act against the interests of the country and you can see they and you call them out for, the do also do that other thing too where from time to time the go all sad and retreat into their fortresses like a girl who's been stood up for a date to the school dance.

And when they do that too also they f*ck over and stab in the back their friends who they forget about and don't think about going full feeling sorry for themselves wounded animal moody turtle that makes it feel less personal cause sometimes their PMS is particularly bad and comes with cramps and their only friend is klipdrift and the veld.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

What could this be in a sea of drab copy-paste people? An impossible and large glistening nugget of wisdom at the bottom of the riverbed? I commend that you do see and are at the level of awareness to the games being played and the trapes that are baited.

Well done, you are wise to the Kings and the Shadows and their reindeers games to play you for fools. Keep going though since you are already thinking and looking.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Bro you aren't exactly helping yourselves. And you do also aggravate the same conclusion everywhere it be done whether it be with beards, thobes and with scarves on, by Ashura in black with headbands on - fly the flag of the country that you are in at a noticeable 1:1 ratio with those of Palestine and the banners and standard of Jannah Shahada or the Black Calls to arms, you make your allegiance suspect and brand yourselves as threatening and disrespectful flying alone only the standard of foreign soil.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

They aren't standing in opposition to you and aren't abandoning you or seeking to undermine you. There book says that they have to first and always maintain allegiance and brotherhood with the diaspora global nation of fellow Muslims called the Ummah. Their faith in strict writing forbids them closing the door you want closed because they are commanded to not be allowed it be closed to keep it open for other Muslims.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

No. The Muslim Brother are stoking up flames of indignation in the the gut-feel emotions of persecution in the Ummah, and using quite effectively little Swedish girls with crippled control to parse their emotions greater even than that of ordinary teenaged girls.

Them and many other girls like them who resonated with the estrangement and hostility aimed at them, who feel used and betrayed by their culture and political opportunism because they were and should feel that way and should be told that and given a hug and a pat on the back, but are instead making ratty fables about martyr scarves announcing their readiness for a violent death sexy fashion attire for the Cover of Vogue.

I mean, you're not completely wrong, and people are not stupid, and while they don't trust Israel because nobody trusts Israel because Israel does shady sh!t and regularly double crosses their friends without finding the brakes or saying sorry; but they're also not stupid either and they don't see the things you are saying that don't match the word that are written.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Which PR firm outsourced to which Academic Department at which University and a Faculty of people who don't know anything camp up with "Afrophobia" as the thing they were going to anchor a damage control campaign and disseminate into one big Whatsapp Group of media personality agreed to be a part of it and looks as suspect and fabricated and unconvincing as a Tyler Perry movie and wonders if it worked.

It does not and I will tell you why - because reading and saying in my head evokes no negative emotions when hurtling to think that they want it to mean is so very much dumber than my brain preferring instead to think of the Jackson 5. And then my brain continues that train of though decided instead that it "Afrophobia" that cause Michael Jackson to break off on his own and start a solo career and because his heart yearned to be set free and launch also into being able to dance also rather than only sing and he was being held back in doing both by shackled like a caged bird by bell bottom pants and type cast into soul music by Afrophobia.

You're welcome; the word is stupid and fails completely and being public relations management vehicle that embeds itself into a subconscious unfocused fear because it is dumb and was going to fail the emotive rebrand of making people wonder if they harbor secret malicious intent for a whole continent of people who even live on it already feel and do not wish to stop feeling the first emotion of pity that is more powerful and cannot be swapped with shame because they are not ashamed of it.

But you only have yourselves to blame for being the last to discover that higher education even without the nonsense disciplines is rife in those others with serious enough names to make a passable field of study that is Science and Evidence-Adjacent a great many people who still do not actually know anything trained to make sh!t up but to do it convincingly enough to be a passable Cargo Cult of Science peer-reviewed by peers who did the same thing as they did.

And that I know they do regularly because following their dissertation through the references and into the data is a hobby of mine like following the rainbow to reach the Leprechuan's data pot wondering what breed of dogsh!t from an underfunded public department collecting data on something nobody really cares too much about.

I am a fearless pioneer and archeologist but the cool Indian Jones kind who explores the untamed badlands of dead, dying or sickly terminal data sources cited by people who launder only the smallest sample of them to force the already foregone conclusion of their whole field reaffirming over and over the existence of bigfoot with another paper that someone graduate having defended that always and forever reasserts new data pointing to bigfoot still existing.

And that is when they get to work on the real work of evangelizing by lobbying for public policy to develop a bigfoot mitigation and management strategy for some they do he choose to reveal himself and has only wandered toward us to risk it when seeking out a new Sudoku puzzle from an abandoned newspaper because he loves those more than anything else.

Okay. Keep paying people with a track record of failure so vast it rivals in scope and sludge and wasted opportunity the opportunity cost of both World Wars put together plus 9/11 and either one of the Iran and Afghanistan wars but not yet both.

[The Black Squirrel of Luton @kylebrockmann]

Allow me to repeat, Sir; drugs are awesome. I've taken lots of them over a lot of years and they make you feel good or brave enough to talk to a pretty girl like pressing a button. I was one of those consumers with a great life who went to church and gave to charity. If I think drugs are awesome when my life is great and can stop taking them because I'm not in poverty struggling, what makes you think you're going to smear "drug consumers" for wanting to feel good when they usually do not like there's something morally reprehensible about that?