An analysis of abuse of AI agents might speak of hierarchy and power play between the human and this entity, and the feeling of social safety humans enjoy because the “victim” is not human.
The very sentiment of having a digital twin, second brain or whatever that is, I have felt is the control over a being and the more human this online entity becomes, the more gratification humans get.
🚨 Pete Hegseth:
“Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war… May the Lord grant unyielding strength and refuge to our warriors, unbreakable protection to them and our homeland, and total victory over those who seek to harm them. Amen.”
An American journalist calling out his government, calling the attack on Iran morally reprehensible. This is nothing extraordinary, this is what journalism should do. This is not seditious, to the contrary, it is about standing up for fellow citizens
A lot of people quote tweeted this as 1 year anniversary of vibe coding. Some retrospective -
I've had a Twitter account for 17 years now (omg) and I still can't predict my tweet engagement basically at all. This was a shower of thoughts throwaway tweet that I just fired off without thinking but somehow it minted a fitting name at the right moment for something that a lot of people were feeling at the same time, so here we are: vibe coding is now mentioned on my Wikipedia as a major memetic "contribution" and even its article is longer. lol
The one thing I'd add is that at the time, LLM capability was low enough that you'd mostly use vibe coding for fun throwaway projects, demos and explorations. It was good fun and it almost worked. Today (1 year later), programming via LLM agents is increasingly becoming a default workflow for professionals, except with more oversight and scrutiny. The goal is to claim the leverage from the use of agents but without any compromise on the quality of the software. Many people have tried to come up with a better name for this to differentiate it from vibe coding, personally my current favorite "agentic engineering":
- "agentic" because the new default is that you are not writing the code directly 99% of the time, you are orchestrating agents who do and acting as oversight.
- "engineering" to emphasize that there is an art & science and expertise to it. It's something you can learn and become better at, with its own depth of a different kind.
In 2026, we're likely to see continued improvements on both the model layer and the new agent layer. I feel excited about the product of the two and another year of progress.
I’m sorry, but seeing Israelis call a damaged hospital a war crime after they’ve directly bombed and invaded hospitals in Gaza and Lebanon, leaving newborns to die unattended in their incubators, is one of the most enraging, sickening things I’ve ever had to read in my life
Trump is back to being Israel's poodle. Good doggie, good doggie. Just like Biden, come get a treat. Next will be pretending that poor Israel is the victim and they need billions more to "defend" themselves. And both Democrats and Republicans will line up to give them our money.
@WHOOP hey, as there’s enough controversy over your change of policy, I had contacted the support regarding upgrade. As the mail thread went on, one of the support people just cancelled my subscription and sent prorated rest of the money my way. Appalling how you treat customers
Supporters of Israel, like Ben Shapiro, are mad at Trump taking $400M plane from Qatar. Because he's taking money from a foreign government? No, they loved it when he was taking it from Israeli citizens, like Miriam Adelson. They're worried others are starting to outbribe them!
@Dynacare hey, my wife’s blood samples were “lost” at your end, and yet you are not sending email communications to the client clinic. How do you generally deal with mismanagement?
@Dynacare@Dynacare my wife did try sending an email through the contact form. However, the form does not let me feed the ticket number. What is your medium of communication to the client if blood samples are lost?
@Dynacare It has been two weeks since she gave her blood samples. It is “lost” and that she will have to give the sample again is what the clinic said quoting the associate at your end. However, the associate would not send this in an email. Acknowledging the “loss” is key here, I suppose