@starfreakclone@code_report In their head I might believe you are right. Assuming that, from my perspective their values on what should be considered on topic are wrong. The default should be to let ideas in if the intent is to improve cpp in some way. IMHO this often includes how other languages do thngs.
@StephanTLavavej@seanbax@lichray I strongly disagree with this decision. Circle is an excellent example of where cpp could go in the future. It's explicitly intended on improving cpp and should be considered as on topic as any proposal.
@jsbarretto @seanbax@mattiapenati@__phantomderp Minor syntax changes should not be a deal breaker. Seems a lot of people would benefit from having an open mind.
Never done trait style programming but it seems people like it and has some benefits.