@lawandnation@DelhiPolice and 'denial of a fair opportunity to defend' that the Darshan judgment sought to guard against, thereby rendering the procedural lapse fatal to the legality of the custody.
I would construe with harmonious construction N 2nd judgment is somewhat of a ‘subject to’ clause of the 1
@lawandnation@DelhiPolice In Mihir Shah the Court explicitly noted that providing the grounds within any later than 2 hours before accused's production renders the counsel's preparation 'illusory.' Consequently, a failure to meet this 2 hour lower limit inherently constitutes the very 'prejudice'
@chetaslua This actually should go viral… bruh! I’m so disenchanted with Gemini. There was a time when it was leading the race as well and now it is shambles
@thegenioo@OpenAI That’s amazing. Unlike you guys I’m not much of a coder thus I haven’t had any experience of 5.3. But in law since the moment they have halved the thinking juice I have observed some deterioration in exhaustiveness. Perhaps the pro lite plan they’re testing would be the way to go
@QueenofLAWmemes Use manupatra and trust me you won’t be disenchanted. Here for instance is BNS ( https://t.co/nlltDEvn6P ). They have provided new sections and right below are the corresponding sections from the now repealed act. Additionally, it also provides landmark judgements.
@anubhav2good@catale7a And in the end come international agreements and covenants such as ICCPR, 1966 and ICERD, 1965, consequently I significantly doubt that person with a sign who’s bespeaking save for Brahmins no one would get the property, would be able to make a robust case
@anubhav2good@catale7a And insofar as comparative law is concerned. therein we have more well settled statute ~ Fair Housing Act, 1968: Prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin. Well! Even here you could argue this is w.r.t tenancy