I wholeheartedly agree with @SpencerGuard:
“Analysts, journalists, policymakers, and the public must demand a higher standard of rigor and context before allowing questionable data to shape international perceptions and policy.”
Far too many just run with Hamas figures forgetting (or ignoring) that they are an internationally-recognized terrorist group who kidnap, torture, and kill without hesitation, including babies. Don’t they realize Hamas would lie to advance their propaganda objectives?
CISA’s mission is to defend against all cyber threats to U.S. Critical Infrastructure, including from Russia. There has been no change in our posture. Any reporting to the contrary is fake and undermines our national security.
Will makes a good point, but I would also say it's an obvious point.
If CTI analysts don't have geopolitical events at the fore when working, then they aren't doing the intelligence part of CTI.
Looking into the grey, providing assessments, and having consideration for all aspects of the environment are key components of an intelligent analysts role.
Today, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (@ODNIgov), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (@CISAgov) released the following statement: https://t.co/3Pg9GsTzEH
Hello.
It is now Cybersecurity Awareness Month. Some organizations less privy to Cybersecurity often label this month "CSAM" month.
Please do not call it CSAM month. Call it CSA month. CSAM is something entirely different.
Thanks,
I honestly do NOT believe politicians are this misinformed on basic principles of the laws of armed conflict like military necessity, distinction, proportionality. Attacking a terrorist pager, given by terrorists to terrorists for terrorist operations. Very discriminate. So what is behind these statements?
I have never seen a battle or war where casualty numbers can be known immediately after a strike. Not in hours, not in minutes. Also never seen a war where main stream media will immediately run numbers from local sources (aka Hamas) while saying they can’t verify the military statements. Despite the repeated examples of local sources (Hamas) providing wild numbers (Al-Ahi) or claiming no combatants were killed (hostage rescue). In an age where main stream media is struggling for credibility and survival you would think they would not repeatedly keep doing this in pursuit of sensationalism.
Based on my 3 research trips into Gaza since October 7th, I 100% agree with the commission and stand by my findings that the @IDF have implemented more measure to prevent civilian harm than any military in history.
https://t.co/Ro9hz1pzT5