no matter. changing direction. openclaw , hermes use the lightweight path of allowing the user to be accountable for their actions. #facebook, get a clue
meta/facebook's whatsapp business api is insane. why would any developer go through that? dropping whatsapp support from my library altogether. the code is there.. but I don't want users/developers using my code to go through zuckerburg's crazy money machin.
having users add a business entity, then add phone number verification and all that business entity crap.. doesn't work in the agentic world. simplify #meta#whatsapp .. whatsup.
finally understood what @mcuban is saying. the middle men in pharma are cruising. i wanted libre3 for sugar/diabetes monitoring. even when i'm willing to pay for it, i can't. and when i do get it, it's an arm and a leg. have to go through hoops. wtf . #diabetes#sugar
Could we not go after a conglomeration of models, transformation based, which is nanochat, and a few others .e.g a model that's just purely primed on the output of weights to have a bias on certain type of weight based on prior learning. should we not have a more general multi-model MoE architecture with memory, one of the experts being purely driven by negative weights - as in prodding and always going after something new. and all of these models being small like the model behind nanochat? curious. I'd love for a day when an AI researcher does not need to have access to gig-gpus
been updating the doc rules for my side-project https://t.co/SOnpBJtV4W to be more #LLMs friendly. @karpathy , maybe we should pause and think. we're in-advertently accelerating something that we will not be able to steer. will continue for now, because it helps my dev process.
@TurnerNovak what does that mean? to me it means, he and his advisors are attuned to where humanity is leaning, even if it's the bad choice, and he's willing to make mistakes to keep ploughing forward. today it happens to be ai. i don't personally condone #meta, i don't have accounts
@elder_plinius or better yet..
Wander, Ponder, Yonder . that's where we're at with prompts, llms, jail breaking. we're in ponder. yonder is way beyond llms.
@Dontbethisguy2 @elder_plinius for now. i use claude exclusively. coding only. they now have a #hugedata on coding practices that noone will have for years. however, that can be gamed with synthetic data. #microsoft should / will wake up on this with #github#copilot. #gemini is good but only with google's own
@Biznitch1177 all of them. or none of them. depends on what side of the collapse you happen to be on at that moment, the observing side or the observed side.
But, isn't that the messy nature of how we humans interact? the utopia of 1 uber system is a fallacy. I'd invite folks to give me differing views on this. I'll take us out for dinner. PM me if you are in the area.
bonus 3/2
#linkedout a post on linkedin -
paraphrasing - "if you're not using #slack, you must not be ok"
linkedout is like #faceout just a different facet.
1/2 my response in 2/2
Kinda viral, but that's because this hits a chord. I beg to differ on the "are you okay" front. We use at least 3 different systems, and they're good where they're at. Granted, having disparate systems gives you other problems to deal with. 2/2