Population dynamics (eg murmuration of birds 🐦🐦🐦) is notoriously hard to learn; choosing the right model for the dynamics is even harder.
In our #ICML2026 spotlight, we introduce Wasserstein Lagrangian Mechanics (WLM) for learning population dynamics from observations, which
- Covers both first-order (gradient descent) and second-order dynamics (e.g. oscillations)
- Allows learning more expressive dynamics (including complex interactions) with fewer assumptions
- Generalizes in space (across different initial conditions) and time (beyond the training time snapshots)
[1/n] 🧵
My first blog post in over a year is a deep dive on flow maps🗺️, or how to learn the integral of a diffusion model to enable faster sampling and several other cool tricks.
It's the longest one yet👀 Let me know what you think!
https://t.co/O8bBGZ9qjC
Adopting Claude speak in my regular life, episode 1:
Partner: Did you do the dishes tonight?
Me: Yes they're done.
Partner: Why are they still dirty?
Me: You're right to push back. I didn't actually do them.
I've been talking a lot about the rehabilitation of continuous language diffusion recently, which seems to be in full swing. If you're curious to learn where things stand, read @FEijkelboom's blog post!
(If flow maps remain a mystery to you, I may be able to help, stay tuned👀)
Constraints are the catalyst of invention. An infinite search space leads to paralysis. The most creative inventions happen when you are forced to solve a problem within appropriately narrow constraints.
What if AI could invent enzymes that nature hasn’t seen? 👩🔬🧑🔬
Introducing 🪩 DISCO: Diffusion for Sequence-structure CO-design
14 rounds of directed evolution and over a year of wet lab work. That's what it took to engineer an enzyme for selective C(sp³)–H insertion, one of the most challenging transformations in organic chemistry.
DISCO surpasses this with a single plate. No pre-specified catalytic residues, no template, no theozyme, no inverse folding, just joint diffusion over protein sequence and structure.
📝 Blog: https://t.co/j9Za0JigfO
📄 Paper: https://t.co/ficrYNBBrM
💻 Code: https://t.co/p81sSwoaPH
@NandoDF It depends on the area of ML. For instance, diffusion/flow-based models turn out to be deeply linked to quantum computing (arXiv:2510.08462), which clearly wouldn't have been apparent in 2017. There have also been misc. other algorithmic advances, e.g., for MCMC.
Many of my colleagues and I attempted to apply diffusion- and flow-model reasoning to the Schrödinger equation, but we were all missing David in our equations!
It started as casual chats where we'd explain concepts from our domains to each other. Until one day David just brought a solution that clicks immediately when you see it – "clearly, this is how it should be done."
Absolutely beautiful in its simplicity and novelty! Don't get scared by all the rigorous analysis (and many months of David's work) that followed – take a peek at this connection between the continuity equation and the Schrödinger equation!
Flow and diffusion models are the Schrödinger equation in disguise.
That’s what we show in our recent paper: "Wavefunction Flows: Efficient Quantum Simulation of Continuous Flow Models" https://t.co/mczpounxnE
This has important consequences in both ML and quantum computing 🧵
This new bridge between disparate fields also serves as a kind of Rosetta stone, letting us cast ML questions as QC questions, and vice versa
E.g., certain quantum states are hard to prepare on complexity-theoretic grounds, which may imply new limits on (classical!) flow models