lllskskjj

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@jnpjng159337 @detiyzhang @asdf15644222 独裁者会不让自己的儿子继任？会把自己的儿子派去战场？儿子几乎死光？傻逼台独汉奸滚nmlgbd的吧

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@asdf15644222 姆巴佩压根儿没提到过毛泽东，很明显是傻逼台独和小日子挑拨离间带节奏呢，姆巴佩说的独裁者可能是最近抖音tiktok上把姆巴佩做成独裁者的ai视频罢了，类似下图这种

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@asdf15644222 视频中姆巴佩的发言大致翻译：
采访者：你觉得最好笑的（关于你脸的）梗图是哪个？
姆巴佩：有很多。最搞笑的那个是大家把我的脸放在一个中国独裁者身上。我经常在网上和朋友们用这个。
他只说了“中国独裁者”（dictateur chinois），没有提到毛泽东的名字。视频后期配了毛泽东形象的换脸图。台独带节奏

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@asdf15644222 @grok 请把视频中姆巴佩的发言翻译成中文，视频中姆巴佩到底有没有提到过毛泽东？还是只提到独裁者？

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@like54900 一样

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@atletic_lleida now，you have 1.3billion chinese fans, cheers

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@nhk_sports 很不错的张本，不容小觑

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@tvtokyosports 张本很不错，未来是他的

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@nhk_sports 张本智和很不错，不要骂他

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@ESPNFC Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid, it is bullshit when it comes to deligt profit from offside

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@boraslanturk Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid, it is bullshit when it comes to deligt profit from offside

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@FactsNas4857 Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid, it is bullshit when it comes to deligt profit from offside

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@thefutballboy_1 Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid, it is bullshit when it comes to deligt profit from offside

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@X30101 Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid, it is bullshit when it comes to deligt profit from offside

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@kimtaaaii Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid, it is bullshit when it comes to deligt profit from offside

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@idextratime @beINSPORTS_EN Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@MunichFanpage Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@MunichFanpage Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@yankowsky @MunichFanpage Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid

[lllskskjj @lbyblmd]

@X30101 Rudiger had his feet behind him, Mazravi who was involved in the header was not offside, De Ligt, who was not involved in the header, was offside, but he did not touch the ball all time, so the goal was valid