Being flexible goes beyond the mere mechanics of making exceptions and allowances...it creates a culture of compassion and care https://t.co/I2B1iTZOXO
Let me protest against the common method of estimating intellectual work by numerical standards alone. If such a standard were allowable, the largest number of scholars taught by the cheapest teacher would be
the greatest success. . . this is wrong, absolutely wrong. Gilman, 1885
Check out my dissertation. It has something for everyone: history, science, politics, linguistics, big data, economics . . . #edtech https://t.co/BLiCd50Bmj
Higher education is often framed as serving the needs of "industry" or "the economy" with special attention to making the poor and people of color "employable." I wonder if this rhetoric is helping to solve inequality or if it is reinforcing it? e.g., @UIAinnovation@c3lresearch
The language of adaptive learning & analytics, as in this Educause video, advances a neo-Fordist ideology and instrumental rationalism (i.e., "efficiency") while distorting individuality and equity https://t.co/b1jsGlhwf2 #preparingformydissertationdefense
@blacktimelord Is there a risk that mastery and competency prioritizes individualistic over social aspects of education the latter of which courses and classes may support?
@14prinsp Presumably, higher education creates self-empowered, creative, free citizens. Every word of "our models predicting student success" should be problematized.