@ConnorHrabchak1 Gotta think Chevy has been behind the Nyquist push and keeping Toews higher in the lineup than he should be. Doesn't want to admit all the moves he made last year were garbage.
@c21markp@BobIrvingCJOB Gotta think Chevy has been behind the Nyquist push and keeping Toews higher in the lineup than he should be. Doesn't want to admit all the moves he made last year were garbage.
@spittinchiclets@Discover And for Biz to end it all with I am sorry if you don’t want to buck up 150 per year to watch something you supposedly love…….. talk about being tone deaf to people’s reality.
@spittinchiclets@Discover Been a listener since the beginning and usually only listen to audio and have netflix so didn’t care. but having to sit through 30 min of hearing you trash fans for being upset that they will go from free to pay and insult them was too much.
@CFLonTSN@TSNDaveNaylor@FarhanLaljiTSN it is too bad but you two have progressed beyond shills to absolute rage bait commenters. Need to have Bauming start to process your credential removal.
@jeffkhamilton@WinnipegNews He didn’t guarantee it at all. He simply said that the CFL is a 3 down league and that « they » had not thought about going to 4downs. Those may be correct and a fact, but that does not guarantee anything for the future. Politico/CEO speak is always well thought out.
@SmartMusclesMD@therealballsy how does moving the goalposts open up offence so much? Here are the stats that show no issue completing in the middle. please explain.
https://t.co/F2fHkBJTwo
CFL End Zone targets 2015-present (incomplete after 2021), adjusted to control boundary-field:
Each target was eyeballed for depth (0-20 yards) and width (-32.5 to +32.5 yards):
The middle of the field looks pretty solid.
@LeachCityNewsTO @therealballsy so exactly how does moving the goalposts make sense? the stats say different than the propaganda.
https://t.co/F2fHkBJTwo
CFL End Zone targets 2015-present (incomplete after 2021), adjusted to control boundary-field:
Each target was eyeballed for depth (0-20 yards) and width (-32.5 to +32.5 yards):
The middle of the field looks pretty solid.
@Schnitzy48 @PFF_Bryson @NelsonHackewich Maybe you should go by actual data mined by our own @DTonOB instead of the vague propaganda being sent out. Looks like those nasty posts are not swatting all of the balls out of the air in the end.
https://t.co/MjeQcdTnrc
CFL End Zone targets 2015-present (incomplete after 2021), adjusted to control boundary-field:
Each target was eyeballed for depth (0-20 yards) and width (-32.5 to +32.5 yards):
The middle of the field looks pretty solid.
@TheJCAbbott@3DownNation Looks like Rourke was right when you look at the numbers of passes/completions and the uprights being in the way. @dtonob doing the real stats crunching.
https://t.co/MjeQcdTnrc
CFL End Zone targets 2015-present (incomplete after 2021), adjusted to control boundary-field:
Each target was eyeballed for depth (0-20 yards) and width (-32.5 to +32.5 yards):
The middle of the field looks pretty solid.
CFL End Zone targets 2015-present (incomplete after 2021), adjusted to control boundary-field:
Each target was eyeballed for depth (0-20 yards) and width (-32.5 to +32.5 yards):
The middle of the field looks pretty solid.
CFL End Zone targets 2015-present (incomplete after 2021), adjusted to control boundary-field:
Each target was eyeballed for depth (0-20 yards) and width (-32.5 to +32.5 yards):
The middle of the field looks pretty solid.
@MiltStegallTSN@CFL@PaperPlatesShow Just because people are not OK with these changes does not mean that they think the game does not have to evolve or change. You are creating a false dichotomy here Milt.
@MiltStegallTSN@CFL@PaperPlatesShow Changing major pieces of the game for change sake without knowing it will help the game, is assinine. And it is not a coincidence that the changes mirror the NFL game.