@gsd_foundation@CryptoWatch_er Yep. I did a whole project with GSD 2 and it burned through aroun $100 of extra tokens. The idea behind it tho is very good. Going back to GSD
@wickedguro I actually tried running paperclip for social media but it was clearly designed for software development, I wonder how you changed the layout of things
@itsviperdemex If he buys it or now, it wouldn't make a different. The market has been set on this. A second platform would emerge quickly, and the public that pays for it would simply follow along.
New in Claude Code: auto mode.
Instead of approving every file write and bash command, or skipping permissions entirely, auto mode lets Claude make permission decisions on your behalf.
Safeguards check each action before it runs.
react took 10 years to become the most-starred repo on github
an AI agent called openclaw did it in 60 days
that mass-starring wasn't even about the code โ people treated it like a movement. openclaw went viral off vibes and a moltbook demo, not because devs read the source and thought "wow great architecture"
github stars are the new vanity metrics. we used to clown on twitter followers, now we're doing the same thing with repos
โDude did you vibe code this slop? This feature sucks!โ
Been getting this more recently.
And no, I didn't โvibeโ it.
Did you ever consider, for one single secondโฆ
That I might just be retarded?
And I wrote this organic slop myself?
meta is considering laying off 20% of its workforce to pay for AI compute while simultaneously admitting their new frontier model can't beat google's
spending billions to fall behind is a hell of a strategy
6.3 million lost orders because amazon mandated AI coding tools and engineers deployed without proper review
the AI read an old wiki page, took it as gospel, and pushed code that broke checkout for six hours
amazon's fix? a 90-day "code safety reset" โ which is corporate for "we told everyone to move fast with AI and now we're shocked they moved fast with AI"
the lesson isn't "AI coding is dangerous." it's that replacing process with vibes is dangerous, and AI just lets you do it at scale
shaquille o'neal, jared leto, and donald trump jr just invested in the same startup
it's replit. $400M round. $9B valuation. the "vibe coding" company
most unhinged cap table in tech history and honestly i respect it
update: this just went live in Teleport
capture a space โ generate a fully navigable 3D world in minutes
๐ captured in a friend's apartment on Iriomote Island, Japan ๐ฏ๐ต
"Anyone can build software in 2026" is the most dangerously incomplete sentence in tech right now.
Anyone can BUILD software. Almost nobody can build software people WANT.
Vibe coding didn't remove the hard part. It removed the easy part.
The hard part was never writing code.
It was figuring out what to build, for who, and why they'd pay.
That skill gap just got wider, not smaller.
February 2026 was the biggest single month of startup funding in history.
$189 billion.
Three companies got 82% of it.
OpenAI: $110B. Anthropic: $30B. Waymo: $16B. That's $156 billion to three organizations that most people wouldn't call startups anymore.
The remaining $33 billion was shared across everything else.
Headlines call this a "startup funding boom." It's not. It's a concentration event dressed up as a rising tide.
The money isn't spreading. It's pooling โ at the top, in the same three or four categories, to teams that already have distribution.
If you're a founder reading this and feeling like funding is plentiful โ it is. Just not for you.
The gap between "AI companies" and "companies using AI" has never been wider.