Just look at this the whole ‘patient safety’ narrative was clearly a smokescreen. Beneath it all was ego, job protectionism, and turf wars. When the dust settles, the public will realise it was never truly about patients @lengreview@wesstreeting@TheBMA@gmcuk@AnaesUnited
@JatinderHayre_@DHSCgovuk Funny how you rear your head whenever there’s an opportunity to have a go. Anyway, how are the book sales going? And you still haven’t answered my last question were you surprised to find ANPs in Norway too
@Melissa_S_Ryan The BMA is a joke. Let me guess, this survey will be completely unbiased too unlike the other surveys they’ve commissioned? Funny how the conclusions always seem to suit the agenda
@Dr__Sarmy That’s rich coming from a locum. If you’re so concerned about GP capacity, perhaps start by explaining why you chose locum work rather than the salaried GP posts you’re defending
@TENkobo_21@parthaskar He clearly wants to stay relevant and knows his time is running out. That’s why he keeps recycling the same content and copying whatever gets the most engagement. PAs living rent free? Sounds more like he needs the attention
Greg McCabe, chairman and CEO of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, breaks three and a half years of public silence on the extraordinary failures of U.S. market regulation and blatant corruption at FINRA and the SEC. McCabe describes unauthorized trading of company shares, massive naked short selling, and a devastating FINRA trading halt that froze assets of 124,000 shareholders. Despite receiving SEC approval for share registration after three years, short sellers have refused to settle. McCabe calls for transparency, accountability, and government intervention to protect retail investors.
00:00:00 The Tip of the Iceberg: How Naked Short Selling Is Destroying American Companies
00:01:13 David vs. Goliath: Greg McCabe's Fight Against Wall Street Corruption
00:03:45 The Unauthorized Trading Scandal: How MMT LP Was Created Without Permission
00:07:47 Short Attacks Explained: The Organized Destruction of American Businesses
00:15:35 Naked Short Selling: The Counterfeit Share Scheme Bigger Than GameStop
00:17:15 Finra's Smoking Gun: The Illegal U3 Halt That Froze 124,000 Investors
00:28:05 The Cover-Up: 13,000 Pages of Hidden Communications and Gary Gensler's Lies
00:41:21 One Billion Counterfeit Shares: The Share Count They Don't Want You to See
00:46:33 The SEC Obstruction: Three and a Half Years to Approve a Simple S-1
00:51:21 Broker Dealers Caught Counterfeiting Shares Instead of Settling Debts
01:01:17 Death Threats, Suicides, and Shattered Retirements: The Human Cost of Market Fraud
01:20:44 The Path to Justice: What Greg McCabe Wants from Trump, the SEC, and America
@GoingRoguewLara
Doctor Malpractice Reporting Portal
Are you a patient, relative or healthcare professional who has suffered harm at the hands of a doctor, or witnessed something that just was not right?
Submit your anonymous report here.
Please share.
https://t.co/uikz4qeLh3
@SarahHT87@JanetEastham And you’re using examples of inappropriate deployment to argue that the roles themselves are doctor substitutes. If an ACP is working outside their scope, address that practice specifically. That doesn’t make the entire profession a doctor replacement.
@SarahHT87@JanetEastham You’re conflating workforce redesign with doctor substitution. ACPs exist to expand the workforce within defined scopes, not to turn non doctors into doctors. “We can’t afford enough doctors” is a workforce planning argument, not proof ACPs were created to replace them.
@SarahHT87@JanetEastham still missing the point. PA&ACP are not doctors and were not created to replace doctors. The existence of inappropriate deployment in some settings doesn’t magically turn the professions themselves into “doctor substitutes”. Stop conflating misuse of a role with the role itself
@SarahHT87@JanetEastham You’re forgetting that PAs and ANPs aren’t remotely the same situation. ANPs have been established across the NHS for more than 20 years, with a much larger and more embedded workforce. You’re not going to simply apply the PA trajectory to ANPs and expect the same outcome
@SarahHT87@JanetEastham Don’t try it. The Leng Review did not conclude that PAs were inherently unsafe. It found the evidence was limited, largely low quality and inconclusive. It specifically said it did not provide a convincing case that the role was so unsafe it needed to be discontinued
@SarahHT87@JanetEastham Nobody is saying ACPs should be above scrutiny. The point is that scrutiny should be evidence based and applied consistently. If the concern is genuinely patient safety, show the evidence rather than assuming the outcome first
@DW8674 We’ve seen this playbook before with PAs: raise “patient safety” concerns, demand a review, then use the review to push for restrictions. Now the same scrutiny is being aimed at ANPs. Patient safety absolutely matters, but so do evidence, scope and competence