Libertarian Project

Freedom Tolerance Opportunity Choice

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

A perfect summary of leftists like Labour and Greens #nzpol

[Jhonf Fonseca @Jhonffonseca]

Marco Rubio lo acaba de clavar como un martillo:

«La violencia de la izquierda no es una “protesta”. Es una revuelta de lo peor contra lo mejor. Es la pataleta de los débiles, los mediocres y los cobardes contra los fuertes, los capaces y los buenos.

Son aquellos que no saben construir, crear ni lograr nada grande… y por eso deciden vengarse del mundo destruyendo lo que otros levantaron con esfuerzo, talento y visión.

Eso es el izquierdismo radical en su esencia más pura. Da igual la etiqueta del momento: anticapitalista, antiimperialista, comunista, anarquista, marxista, “progresista” o “activista climático”. El ADN es siempre el mismo.

Es resentimiento venenoso disfrazado de “justicia social”.

Es envidia podrida maquillada de “igualdad”.

Es odio a la excelencia envuelto en banderas de “liberación”.

Su único talento es destruir.

Su única alegría es ensuciar lo hermoso.

Su único objetivo es arrastrar todo hacia abajo para que nadie brille más que su propia mediocridad.

A través de la violencia, el terror y la cancelación buscan imponer su fealdad espiritual sobre la sociedad. No es idealismo. No es utopía. Es nihilismo puro con sonrisa moralista.

El viejo dogma se equivocó: esto no viene de gente que sueña con un mundo mejor, sino de gente que no soporta que el mundo sea mejor sin ellos.

Y ya estamos hartos.

La civilización no se defiende pidiendo perdón. Se defiende nombrando al enemigo por su nombre.

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

@Hakanz29760221 @nzfirst Winston is quite explicitly campaigning for the party vote.

Even he doesn't expect NZF to win an electorate seat.

[KJW @Hawkesbay69]

R.I.P 🫡

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

Labour and Hipkins are bringing out their greatest hits to entice voters. Cosying up to gangs. Being hectored by Helen Clark.Patronised by Jacinda Ardern and lied to by Trevor Mallard #nzpol

[ānaru @ZooNealand]

@SeanPlunket Mallard tweeted about the Wainuiomata Community Hall being closed

An alternate place to vote was 160 metres away, at Wainuiomata Woolworths - which was open for voting today

AI says it’s a 2-minute walk

[Sean Plunket @SeanPlunket]

This has as much credibility as his false rape claims that destroyed an innocent man’s career and cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands

[Media Bias @Media58Bias]

Trevor Mallard spent years bullying people and MPs and throwing his weight around as Speaker.
Now a closed hall in Wainuiomata has him crying “voter suppression". You don’t get to play the victim after a career of being the bully. No one is buying it. Now f..k off.
@WainuiTrevor

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

Trevor Mallard delivering more electoral poison for Labour
He is Hopeless Hipkins mentor #nzpol

[ānaru @ZooNealand]

Trevor Mallard complained that the Wainuiomata Community Hall was closed and he couldn’t vote - which was Trumpian ‘voter suppression’

AI says he could have voted at Woolworths instead today… which is 160 metres away from the Hall

[Handre @Handre]

Thomas Sowell grew up poor in Harlem and spent his twenties as a Marxist. A job inside the federal government ended that. Asked what changed his mind, he gave a one-word answer: "facts."

Chicago sharpened the habit, with Milton Friedman teaching him, and he carried it through more than 45 books and a column in over 150 newspapers. From housing to the minimum wage, he checked what policies did and ignored what their authors promised.

His most famous line sits in A Conflict of Visions: "There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs." Politicians hate that sentence because it puts everyone selling solutions out of work. Every program has a price, and voters rarely pay it.

Sowell lived by it. When the Reagan administration put him on an economic advisory committee, he resigned after the first meeting. He pointed to Friedman's view that some individuals "contribute more by staying out of government."

He retired from writing in December 2016 at 86 and turned 96 this June. His method fits on an index card: skip the promises, check the results.

Now go ahead and do that with your local ruling class.

[NZ Media World @1nzmw]

Our next Prime Minister? What is a Woman?

Asked at a press conference to define "woman", Chris Hipkins said the question had "come slightly out of left field", then: "biology, sex, gender. People define themselves."

Pressed again, he said he hadn't "pre-formulated an answer", adding: "people define their gender identity for themselves."

Our next Prime Minister? Watch the full exchange in his own words and make up your own mind.

Feel free to share this content on other platforms.

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

@gaye_ess Haven't seen Labour Greens or Opportunity be able to get a voluntary crowd of any size but the media claim they are popular

[Little Miss Word Salad -Chloe - #BootTheLeftOut @kitcalledkat]

great pic from STOP TIAKI WAI

[MAZE @mazemoore]

Robert Reich in 2025: Trump is a fascist dictator for even suggesting that a company be taken over by the government and for telling a CEO what to do.

Robert Reich in 2026: SpaceX and Starlink must be taken over by the government.

Small man, giant fraud.

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

Dr Hook – Sylvia’s Mother | The story behind the song | Top 2000 a gogo https://t.co/FFUkB8Knxf via @YouTube

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

Trevor Mallard another Labour vote turn off

[Sir Chippo D'Failure @ramarata333]

Trevor Mallard dons his foil hat again.

Remember this was the man who used PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE against the freedom convoy at parliament 4 years ago.

You cant trust anything this gutless cockroach says

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

@NumberEightNews @dbseymour Pure grift

[Collin Rugg @CollinRugg]

BREAKING: Brazil's election could be annulled, according to the New York Times.

Electoral lawyers say Brazil's current situation is "extremely serious" and a "critical situation."

The NYT reports that confusion over a last-minute voting extension by Justice Cristiano Zanin, who was appointed by Lula, could lead to the election being annulled.

"This is an extremely serious, critical situation," said electoral lawyer Priscilla Sodré Pereira to the New York Times.

When Zanin made the last-minute decision to extend voting hours, some polling stations had already closed and shut down their voting machines. They could not reopen.

"Fernando Neisser, an electoral law professor at Fundação Getulio Vargas, a Brazilian research institute, said the election could be annulled if the margin is very narrow and it is shown that polling stations stayed open longer in areas that strongly favor one candidate," the NYT reported.

Wow.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

You can vote yourself into communism, but you can't vote yourself out of it

[Kate ❤️‍🩹 @detroitsux]

Smart white boys surpass their teachers in intelligence by fourth or fifth grade. Remember public elementary school teachers have IQs around 100-105 based on SAT scores. These women know it and they hate it. They like compliance. They grade based on compliance.

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

@TheNzRocketeer The non enrolment is message of none of the above

[Libertarian Project @libProject]

Ardern was like a McDonalds burger straight off the production line #nzpol

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

To understand why Western leaders all sound the same, you need to understand how a system that has captured its own institutions keeps producing elites aligned on the worst possible line.

In 2004, Klaus Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders. Every year, the WEF selects a few hundred people under 40. You don't apply. You get nominated by people already inside and vetted by people already inside. Then come the annual summits, Davos, and a two-week executive program at Harvard Kennedy School built around global governance, climate, global health and "21st century leadership."

Emmanuel Macron: class of 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. Gabriel Attal: listed by the WEF itself among its notable members. In 2017, at Harvard, Schwab bragged that his network "penetrates the cabinets" of governments. His words, not mine.

Now here's the mistake most critics make. They imagine a brainwashing camp. Two weeks at Harvard don't rewire anyone. The YGL program doesn't create the mindset. It certifies it.

The capture happened upstream. The formatting starts at 18. Sciences Po, ENA, Harvard, Columbia, Yale Law. Ten years of being graded by people who already hold the consensus. You learn fast that the reward doesn't go to whoever is right, but to whoever restates the room's beliefs most elegantly. Every essay, every oral exam, every internship in a ministry or a consulting firm teaches the same lesson: the frame is given, your job is to optimize inside it.

Obama never went through YGL. He didn't need to. Columbia, Harvard Law, president of the Law Review. Same factory, American edition.

So by the time the WEF calls, the product is finished. The program just adds the final layer: flattery. You're told you're one of the few people under 40 who will shape the world. You spend your summers with ministers, CEOs, royals and Nobel laureates who all agree with each other. Imagine what that does to a 35-year-old ego.

That's the profile it produces. Very high verbal intelligence, very low dissent. Brilliant at defending the frame, never trained to question it. And a narcissism fed by a network that confirms, year after year, that you belong to the elect. Combine the two and you get leaders who are never punished for being wrong, as long as they're wrong together.

Immigration is the perfect test case. Obama, Macron, Attal can tighten a law, announce deportation numbers, harden their tone before an election. Obama deported more people than any president before him. But listen to how they talk about it. For them, immigration is never a civilizational question. It's a flow to manage, a labor shortage to fill, a demographic curve to correct, a moral duty to perform. Whether a nation has the right to remain itself never even enters the frame. Not because they've answered the question. Because their education taught them it isn't a legitimate one.

That's why the voter who says "my town has changed and I'm worried" gets a lecture instead of an answer. The leader isn't even lying to him. It's worse: he genuinely cannot see what the voter sees. Twenty years of formatting taught him that this perception is a bias to correct, not a reality to address.

That's the real problem with captured institutions. Not a secret plot. A monoculture. Same schools, same summits, same Davos panels, same vocabulary from Paris to Ottawa to Washington. When every leader is selected by the consensus and rewarded by the consensus, the consensus stops being tested against reality.

And a ruling class that never gets confronted with reality ends up governing a country that only exists in its own slide decks.

Before you vote, ask one question about every candidate: who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

To understand why Western leaders all sound the same, you need to understand how a system that has captured its own institutions keeps producing elites aligned on the worst possible line.

In 2004, Klaus Schwab created the Forum of Young Global Leaders. Every year, the WEF selects a few hundred people under 40. You don't apply. You get nominated by people already inside and vetted by people already inside. Then come the annual summits, Davos, and a two-week executive program at Harvard Kennedy School built around global governance, climate, global health and "21st century leadership."

Emmanuel Macron: class of 2016, the same year he launched his presidential campaign. Gabriel Attal: listed by the WEF itself among its notable members. In 2017, at Harvard, Schwab bragged that his network "penetrates the cabinets" of governments. His words, not mine.

Now here's the mistake most critics make. They imagine a brainwashing camp. Two weeks at Harvard don't rewire anyone. The YGL program doesn't create the mindset. It certifies it.

The capture happened upstream. The formatting starts at 18. Sciences Po, ENA, Harvard, Columbia, Yale Law. Ten years of being graded by people who already hold the consensus. You learn fast that the reward doesn't go to whoever is right, but to whoever restates the room's beliefs most elegantly. Every essay, every oral exam, every internship in a ministry or a consulting firm teaches the same lesson: the frame is given, your job is to optimize inside it.

Obama never went through YGL. He didn't need to. Columbia, Harvard Law, president of the Law Review. Same factory, American edition.

So by the time the WEF calls, the product is finished. The program just adds the final layer: flattery. You're told you're one of the few people under 40 who will shape the world. You spend your summers with ministers, CEOs, royals and Nobel laureates who all agree with each other. Imagine what that does to a 35-year-old ego.

That's the profile it produces. Very high verbal intelligence, very low dissent. Brilliant at defending the frame, never trained to question it. And a narcissism fed by a network that confirms, year after year, that you belong to the elect. Combine the two and you get leaders who are never punished for being wrong, as long as they're wrong together.

Immigration is the perfect test case. Obama, Macron, Attal can tighten a law, announce deportation numbers, harden their tone before an election. Obama deported more people than any president before him. But listen to how they talk about it. For them, immigration is never a civilizational question. It's a flow to manage, a labor shortage to fill, a demographic curve to correct, a moral duty to perform. Whether a nation has the right to remain itself never even enters the frame. Not because they've answered the question. Because their education taught them it isn't a legitimate one.

That's why the voter who says "my town has changed and I'm worried" gets a lecture instead of an answer. The leader isn't even lying to him. It's worse: he genuinely cannot see what the voter sees. Twenty years of formatting taught him that this perception is a bias to correct, not a reality to address.

That's the real problem with captured institutions. Not a secret plot. A monoculture. Same schools, same summits, same Davos panels, same vocabulary from Paris to Ottawa to Washington. When every leader is selected by the consensus and rewarded by the consensus, the consensus stops being tested against reality.

And a ruling class that never gets confronted with reality ends up governing a country that only exists in its own slide decks.

Before you vote, ask one question about every candidate: who formatted them, and who do they still need to impress?