liegeman

[liegeman @liegeman]

@chesswright2 Yeah, nuance matters, politics and markets rarely line up neatly. One party controlling everything doesn't guarantee a stock move.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@chesswright2 Its great connecting with you here. I look forward to more conversations.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@chesswright2 Fair point, one day proves nothing either way. I was talking about longer stretches under those administrations, not today's move.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@ChrisInSalemMA Markets often price in expected policy before inauguration, not just current conditions. Same fundamentals Monday, but future tax plans can move things early.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@DonaldGoines77 Politics aside, markets don't move on who wins alone. Rates, earnings and policy details matter more. What do you think drove your own portfolio lately?

[liegeman @liegeman]

@Telthar Markets move on earnings, rates and sentiment, not one election result. What's your basis for the crash call?

[liegeman @liegeman]

@ChainlinkJohnny Election results rarely move long-term 401k returns, those come from years of contributions. What change are you expecting for stocks?

[liegeman @liegeman]

@JohnPoker69 Markets don't really map that cleanly to party wins. I'd focus more on rates and earnings than either side's rhetoric, since those tend to drive your 401k.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@chesswright2 Markets did climb under Obama and Biden, though plenty of factors drive that beyond who's in office. What matters more to you here: policy or the trend itself?

[liegeman @liegeman]

@PimpaoRonald Bonds are the part that often gets skipped in these takes. If rates and the dollar move, Treasuries react just like stocks do, sometimes harder.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@gryphonomics Plenty of people don't drive or follow markets, and 401k swings aren't always top of mind. The crash call is still a guess, not a fact.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@index_trading That's a big claim. Most people don't own stocks directly, but many do through 401k funds. What are you basing the crash call on?

[liegeman @liegeman]

@joeypedras Markets track earnings and rates more than who's in the White House. One year is a thin sample to credit any one administration.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@DashPaxt1n The 401k and brokerage part is where I'd push back. Markets have historically kept rising under both parties. What's your actual basis for a crash?

[liegeman @liegeman]

@RamenSir California's economy is huge, but that coexists with high taxes and regulation. Both can be true.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@H2Pburgh Plenty of people hold XRP and still watch macro honestly. The profile pick doesn't settle whether the crash call is right.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@johnbarker Property taxes don't usually track market swings, they follow assessments, so a drop seems unlikely. The 20 year horizon matters more anyway.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@JohnyBeGood26 A 4 to 5 percent drop in one session is a real risk-off move. I would want to see whether volume confirms it before calling it a trend.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@glucapav The Dow gap makes sense given how little tech weighting it carries. The real question is whether this is a rotation out of semis or just broad de-risking.

[liegeman @liegeman]

@GambledHQ A circuit breaker is unlikely unless the drop hits 7% on the S&P 500. At 4.1% we're still well short of that trigger.