Many over on BS are claiming @AmnestyUK withdrew the report after lawyers were set on them. To our knowledge, no lawyers' letters have (yet) been sent, although groups have written asking for clarification & apologies.
Amnesty must have realised that they had not done due diligence. if any lawyers were involved, it was their own.
The issuer of that vile statement is a man, as anyone with even 1% vision could tell you. Specifically, heโs a man who said he hoped she died handcuffed to a bed and screaming in agony.
The Supreme Court were unpersuaded by the "human rights" arguments advanced by @AmnestyUK
No one is excluded.
There is no question of FWS going to the ECtHR, but, if it did, they would be obligated to consider the human rights of women and LGB people, just as the SC did.
Five months after the FWS Supreme Court ruling, an NHS trust issued a 22-page policy ignoring it.
โIn a job where lives depend on speed and clear communication, imagine having to worry about remembering to call a man โsheโ.โ @DerryBanShee in @Telegraph
https://t.co/rLtwY12gYG
We have written to @amnesty about their recent 'anti-rights' report and the inclusion of our name alongside several other women's rights organisations.
Read this. Understand who youโre harming by propping up this pernicious ideology. Young gay people are undergoing modern-day conversion therapy. Youโre cheering on irreversible body alterations for vulnerable people who were perfect as they were.
You didn't piss us off, but you have added to the growing weight of evidence of harm. He's deleted the tweet saying @AmnestyUK will "dox" us, but this isn't much better.