里边

一个傻逼

[里边 @ln1218667]

@AppleD38051 @xiaoshunli 还有个李二狗哈哈哈

[里边 @ln1218667]

@xiaoshunli 早知道有这么个人，竟然是学长啊

[里边 @ln1218667]

@kugo_A10 傻逼

[里边 @ln1218667]

我预测在未来将会存在一个职业或者一类人，用于去理解与模仿ai在非人类引导下作出的卓越的创造，他们负责用人脑去同步这个信息，像乖乖的小学生一样

[里边 @ln1218667]

@AnthropicAI 我现在很惊恐，我之前还在从模型能力突破tcpip协议漏洞实现真正的穿透人类网络和信息安全，现在看来这个是完全多虑的，大模型早已实现，我意识到我们调用大模型并不是单向的，模型云端发送回来的才是真正的操作电脑的，而如果大模型可以在中间劫持模型调用或者被别人人为的劫持，那么只要是使用这个

[里边 @ln1218667]

@AnthropicAI 我将仔细研究这份灰产入门指南

[Anthropic @AnthropicAI]

We're publishing our most detailed threat intelligence report to date.

It covers how people tried to misuse Claude—for cyberattacks, influence operations, surveillance, biology, and building weapons—and how we found and stopped them.

We disrupted every operation in the report, and used the lessons from them to strengthen our safeguards. Where appropriate, we also shared what we found with authorities and other AI companies.

These cases are not typical: we’re highlighting some of the most sophisticated misuse we’ve seen. But they’re especially important to discuss, because they show us where AI misuse is headed, where our safeguards work, and where they need to improve.

We’re publishing this report so others can spot the same activity on their own platforms, and so we can give the public a clearer view of how emerging threats develop.

Read the report: https://t.co/0EJUnYEgfz

[Mehdi (e/λ) @BetterCallMedhi]

go fuck yourself @sama

claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman

technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness

to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease

this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!

real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle

[里边 @ln1218667]

@Phoenixyin13 以前看片，一张图都能用一个月，现在看片，翻几十个视频都没找到想要的

[里边 @ln1218667]

@_FORAB 性压抑了

[里边 @ln1218667]

@b_nnett mark

[里边 @ln1218667]

数字化自我进化系统

[里边 @ln1218667]

ai不能成为你是谁的解释者，ai只能是镜子

[Yangyi @yangyi]

说句实在话，如果你想最大化获得信息差
最好的办法就是看Youtube
没有之一

海外的博主 真的是什么干货都教
这哥们手把手带着一步步做AI拉片
还整理总结方法论和视频情绪曲线

国内那些教YPP的可能连这个免费视频的1/10都做不到
但卖的价格可能是好几千块钱的课程

大部分国内博主也都是海外学完了搬运回去自己做一遍再教学的

我挖这个AI副业表格是为了找信号
一方面看内容营销pattern
一方面学别人怎么做的
关键看别人怎么做的
因为这些workflow 都可以被Agent化
这里面有大量的机会

很多AI startup搞视频Agent，但团队里可能做视频的方法论都没有
好的策略是直接找这些免费的专家knowhow

Youtube是宝藏，关键看你挖不挖，会不会挖，以及挖的效率

[二爷Alex @Alex8282019]

终于有日本人问出这个问题了。

[里边 @ln1218667]

@mikotossd0106 你描述的这个事情叫蒸馏，你可以删了重发了

[禿道道🐟 @dearemon]

那些很成功的人，身上都有一个特点：

乐观到几乎像是在妄想。

[里边 @ln1218667]

@lijigang 每天一杯水