@henribergson666@creepingmraxist I liked the first book when I first read it but the more I thought about it the more I felt like its effect fully depends on the reader’s ignorance of the subject matter, especially as it goes on
i know this is a joke, but i see the serious version a lot, and i have to say: its actually really weird that its LLMs specifically that are good at math (to the extent they are) and at coding. like this is the weirdest possible way for computer to be good at computer
@0chraceus@hecubian_devil notably go ais did not reach superhuman strength by just computing more variations. It’s reasonable for something like deep blue but at a certain point “just computing stuff” becomes a really inadequate description of what’s going on here
@oh_tuntun@ragandboneshop Many people also just seem to think there is no place for romance, naïveté, etc in serious novels (whether or not interrogated) which is baffling to me. Are you coming for war and peace too??
in my opinion when you honk your horn it should open a brief window of opportunity for other drivers to remotely trigger water to spray you in the face from your steering wheel
@brunellaism 100%, and to the limited extent that there is something you can call an MFA style, the problem with it imo is that it focuses on eliminating flaws over cultivating style and interest. The classics are full of bizarre flaws but we forgive them
@no_earthquake The little (according to the best reconstructions) aside is so maddening to me. it’s right there, you should be able to see the whole thing falls apart, you are already half-acknowledging it!